preview

Paleolithic Woman Analysis

Decent Essays

Nisa is very useful since she has more personal insight and experience on how the paleolithic women used to live. Evidence is that her family were hunter gatherers and when she left from “the bush” she started to learn what other people were like since she was only used to staying and waiting for her father to bring food. And she realized that people in the wider world are stingy.
In her culture it is tradition for a wife and husband to have sex. Nisa believed she was expected to have sex with Tashay but later was surprised that he didn’t ask her. It is shown that the San people are very acceptable of people having multiple lovers. Nisa had around 4 husbands as well as many lovers. These beliefs compared to a contemporary society are not as …show more content…

The human portrayal was more powerful. And wore something on their face because it did not look like a human face more like an animal. But as for the last one it seems more of a religious ceremony than hunting and the animals were maybe used as sacrifice.
I respond to it as more of a viewpoint of cultural and artistic appreciation because the bird mask and staff interpretation seems more of a religious culture.
That it is a big women and seems like a venus figurine to me.
Some features include the size of the women and appearance. The size of the women in the sculpture shows that she is big and powerful. And the appearance and how she is sitting shows that she is a royalty or like Mellaart said goddess. Another understanding could of been that it was just a sculpture pertaining to body image.
Feminist scholars would be attracted since most beauty standards are to be skinny and have a hourglass figure. But in this sculpture it portrays a woman that is a bigger size and does not have a hourglass figure. So feminist scholars would think that during that time that was the beauty standard for the people.
Since Catalhuyuk was such a small Neolithic village it does not have enough evidence for scholars to draw their conclusions. Therefore there is a passionate debate since little evidence is …show more content…

And then transitioned to the Neolithic with the sculpture of the women and the physical remains of the Otzi caveman. The sculpture showed how they expressed and recorded their ways through art and Otzi showed how important personal items were.
People today can look at the cave art or even the sculptures and see how they lived and interpreted things. And they can appreciate the creations that were left. As well as the evidence left helps scholars interpret what they were and then explain to today’s world about what happened and how people lived a million years ago. I relate to the account by Nisa because I am a female and some of the beliefs she had in the San society are the same beliefs we have in today’s world.
Since historians are lacking lots of evidence it makes them have to look into it more. But sometimes they can be wrong which makes these researches uncertain. I think it’s good because others can speculate as well and have their own opinion about the evidence. And they can share

Get Access