Parthenon And Pantheon Research Paper

Parthenon is a former temple,Greece dedicated it to their goddess Athena, the people of Parthenon considered it as their patron.While they were creating a building the Persians decided to come over and burn it down and where that building was after the Persians burnt it down the Greeks built the Parthenon right where the other building was.

The Parthenon is a classical style of ancient Greek architecture and the most important building in the city and it self replaced on older temple of Athena, which called Pre-Parthenon. It was built and completed in 438 B.C buy Iktinos and Kallikrates, after that destroyed by Persian in 480 B.C. The Temple all made form marble and its 20 miles far from Athens. Later

The Parthenon and the Pantheon are both ancient temples, worldly famous, dedicated to ancient but no longer worshiped Gods and Goddesses of Greece and Rome.

The Parthenon and the Pantheon are both amazing and detailed buildings. Although the Parthenon was built in Athens and the Pantheon in Rome, both of these buildings share some similarities, but are also different as well. In this paper I will share how the similarities and differences between Ancient Greece and Rome are seen in these two buildings.

The pantheon which is located in Rome was originally commissioned by Marcus Agrippa, 27 BCE-14 AD, during Augustus’s reign. It was later rebuilt in 126 AD by the Emperor Hadrian. It was built to be a Temple for the worship of all Gods (wikipedia.org).

Initial observations of the Roman Pantheon from the front appear to be similar to the ruins of the Greek Parthenon, but really both structures are somewhat unique in their composition, purpose, design, and fate. Constructed over half of a millennium after the Parthenon was built, the Pantheon, built in 27 B.C., exhibits some of the architectural styles and characteristics of its predecessor. However, the Romans refined Greek building techniques, thereby developing a unique and more advanced architectural style.

The most obvious similarity would be that of the protruding domes the two buildings possess. While they do have similar shape, they are constructed differently according to the style of the area. The Pantheon, for example, consists of stone and concrete, as opposed to the Dome of the Rock, which consists of a gilded wooden dome. With a central diameter of 142 feet, the Pantheon is actually the world’s largest unsupported dome. The romans had to design it with certain weight releases, such as the numerous coffers and the central oculus, in order to keep the dome from collapsing on itself. Because of its shape, most of the weight is pushed down and around the circumference of the dome. To keep it supported, thick concrete walls inside of the

Very similar in shape to the epic Colosseum which is oval, but different in its purpose. The Colosseum also boasts greater heights than the Pantheon, but that does not make it any less impressive. The Pantheon is a major Roman monument that showcases simplistic structural design but is amazing in the sense of its dimensions. With columns garnering 12 meters in height, and weighing 50 tons, made of solid granite; it is incredible that they were able to transport them in one piece from such great distances. Atop of the columns were lintels made of marble weighing 30 tons. However the greatest example of the Roman’s advancement in their use of materials is seen in the coffered dome of the Pantheon, which is made entirely of concrete; 5000 tons of it. Nothing larger than the dome of the Pantheon was built until the 20th century. The inside diameter of the dome is almost 44 meters wide, half the length of a football field. The concrete in the dome has no steel reinforcements, which is something that would not be attempted today. To admit light and ventilation throughout the building, a 29 foot oculus (eye) is left open to the sky at the top. That just shows how bold and ingenious the Romans really were because the dome itself is a perfect hemisphere. It is astounding the achievement that Romans have made with the Pantheon, having to come up with an original device, and experiment with building materials, in order to construct such magnificent dimensions. It would not have been possible to do this without the Roman’s invention of

The Parthenon is known as the Temple of Athena Parthenos. Phidias and his team (Ictinus and Callicrates) began the process of building the Parthenon in 447 B.C.E. “It is one of the main buildings in the Acropolis and was dedicated to honor Athena. The buildings showed a lot of wealth and power to the Athenian empire. The architecture of the Parthenon shows elements of the clarity.” The Parthenon has a rather uniquely structured building. There is nothing cookie-cutter about the shape. The surfaces are rarely straight and there are hardly any completely horizontal or vertical lines. Instead of using the straight lines they went with more of a slight curve. Also the floor was not flat it had a more pronounced curve than people had seen before which made it stand out. The outer floor was had about a 6-inch difference from the inner floor. The unusual structure of the Parthenon was not due to poor architect skills it was completely

Built originally as temples, we see above some ways where we can draw a difference between Ancient Rome's and Greece's building techniques. Both structures were transformed converted into churches but nowadays only the Pantheon remains one, the Parthenon is a museum. Both structures went through much degradation, specially the Parthenon but both still stand tall, marvelling everyone to this day.

I decided to compare the Pantheon and Hagia Sophia. The Pantheon is in Rome, Italy and the Hagia Sophia is located in Istanbul, Turkey previously Constantinople. I chose these structures because the construction of domes fascinates me. How the domes were constructed is explained in the text, yet the concept still baffles me how people were actually able to build domes with the technology present then and that the domes did not collapse on themselves.

However, behind this, there is differences with the two structures. One of the most significant differences is the material being used in the structure. While in the Parthenon in ancient Greece is constructed from marble the Pantheon of Rome has a different structure. Much of the structure is made from granite, this is particularly the case with the pillar construction.

The word Pantheon comes from a Greek word Pantheion, meaning "of, relating to, or common to all the gods". (Pantheon - Rome, 2017) Even though the origins appear to be very similar, even borrowing its name from the Greeks, the Pantheon is distinctly Roman. Looking at the entrance you would immediately get the impression of Greek architecture with its massive columns and portico entrance. However, once inside, the building takes on a completely different feel. The Romans were masters of the dome structure, and the Pantheon has the world’s largest that is not reinforced with steel in anyway. (Pantheon - Rome,

The word Pantheon is derived from the Greek word "pan”, which means "all” and "theos” which means "god”. The Roman culture seems to borrow on the Greek classical culture. The style and the function of these classical ancient temples show that Greeks and Romans were worshipers of many gods; and were a religious society. They provide invaluable information about the past, portrays great technical skills, lifestyle and social structures.The Parthenon shows Greece superiority in technology advancement, which gave birth to an age of philosophers.The two structures having been constructed from marble (Parthenon) and granite and concrete (Pantheon), shows that those were the raw materials available in those days. These ancient cultures portray people who also were political in their days and they loved to pass strong messages through art (classical buildings).

When we see the Parthenon in Athens seems located in isolated place where i can not see some other building in its surrounding. But the pantheon in Rome is built in the middle of city where there are a lot of building around it. The Parthenon in Athens is not in good condition and it is left only the remaining and seems it is not used anymore for service. on the other hand the Pantheon in Rome is in good condition where it seems as nothing damage happened to it. There are many people  who seems providing or taking some service.