For many years, animal testing has been very widely accepted in the world for the purpose of testing products such as makeup, new medicine and medical procedures, as well as determining whether or not some foods are safe for human consumption. It’s a growing problem in the world that has led to the suffering of animals for thousands of years in order to benefit humans. In order to fix this, these tests need more strict regulations to be implemented in order to save animal lives and find less inhumane solutions to continue humanity's progressive lifestyle without destroying nature's. Animal testing has been a widely used practice in scientific research since the dawn of modern civilization. The earliest recorded accounts …show more content…
Chris Abee, Director of University of Texas Cancer Center, stated that without the testing of chimpanzees, they would not have a vaccine for Hepatitis B and the use of animal testing is their best hope for finding a cure for Hepatitis C. Though a necessity for some things, animal testing isn’t the only way to test new products and find cures for diseases. There are ways that can reduce the animal death toll and prevent inhumane treatment of all kinds of animals. In-vitro studies have been shown to be an effective tool, which is the performance of a procedure in a controlled environment outside of a living organisms. Though not as effective as in-vivo studies, the living cells of a organisms can last months to years if kept in a controlled environment to allow for the study of diseases without the killing of animals. Animal testing is also a very unregulated practice in the world, According the Animal Welfare Act, animals such as rats, mice, fish and birds are not covered, which makes up to 95% of the animals used in research. Another flaw of animal testing is sometimes that drug tests on animals don't always correlate to humans. According to neurologist Aysha Akhtar, over 100 drugs that were effective when used on animals were
Although there have been significant medical breakthroughs based in animal testing and experimentation, animal testing is a poor method of science as it is largely useless and
Testing products on animals may seem like a great way to eliminate the risk of possibly
Animal testing is crucial because without it, scientists might never find developments for biomedical research. Worldwide, there are millions of diseases that create devastation in countless families. However, there are vaccines, cures, and processes that scientists have came up with to help fix this problem. How fast and efficiently they come up with these treatments is the difference in many lives saved. Animal testing has been proven to speed up the process of collecting research
Approximately 26 million animals are used every year in the United States alone for research and commercial testing (“Background of the Issue” 1). For years, legislators have debated the pros and cons of animal testing, and laws were passed to attempt to fix the inhumane treatment of the cute, innocent testing subjects, the animals. Although the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) was revised numerous times, “the species most commonly used in experiments (mice, rats, birds, fish, reptiles, and amphibians) comprise 99% of all animals in laboratories” and are the animals that are specifically exempted from protection under the act (“Experiments on Animals” 2). A simple fix to animal cruelty during testing is to use alternative methods since human and animal bodies already vary greatly. For years, animal testing was the best option because there was no alternative to testing on a living, whole-body system; however, in the age of technology, there is no reason for millions of animals to be killed due to the severity of the testing. Therefore, animal testing should be banned because alternative methods provide more accurate results since human bodies are very different than animal bodies; furthermore, animal advocacy organizations should promote cruelty-free products more so customers know what to purchase and use.
Throughout the years the use of animals in medical research has been a hot debate around the world. Although animal testing may be cruel and inhumane, thousands of humans are saved thanks to the research that animals supply researchers with. Animals testing have taken over our knowledge of medicine and treatments to a whole different level. Animal testing also does this in a cheap and effective way. Without animals testing out knowledge wouldn’t be up to date, in other words animals’ testing is good.
A life can be taken or created in a matter of seconds and with that has come the miracles of modern medicine. People have come to expect science to save lives, prevent illness, relieve suffering and improve the quality of life. The means of curing, treating and preventing diseases are not achieved by magic or accident. Medical advances are gained through years of intensive research -- research in which laboratory animals have played, and continue to play, a critical role. Opponents of animal testing are wrongfully determined that this process is completely unethical.
We can all come together and bring an end to the growing rate of animal cruelty. A brighter future for the earth’s ecosystem and human society, where more animals are happy and free. This can also prevent animals from going extinct. Although it won’t bring an end to it right away, we can at least begin to make it come to an end. We can have more people feel even more humane about life, knowing that animal cruelty is being fought and removed from existence. It will bring people to justice for what they did to the animals. This will be a revolutionary idea for a better and new future for our kids in the
The origins of animal testing can be traced to the 3rd century B.C., but earlier research has even
For centuries humans have dedicated their time and research to animal experimentation. A large number of these animals are being utilized and taken from their homes involuntarily. They are abused, mishandled and harmed for our own benefit to create products such as cosmetic supplies, vaccines, and medication.
There is humane ways to do research. Such as the In Vitro method. This method uses a system that mimics the structure and function of the human organs and organ system. This can be used in disease research, drug testing, and cosmetics. It also allows for cancer screening, and to test new surgical operations. Scientists are developing new cell and tissue tests. This alternative is less costly and way more reliable than using animal tests. In 2004 there was an arthritis drug called Vioxx that was tested on animals. If appeared to be safe, but it was later recalled
Animal testing has given us many medical breakthroughs such as Penicillin, blood transfusion, and Tamoxifen for
The testing of animals in scientific and commercial research has been debated for many years. Some people view animals as companions or part of the family, but others think of them as a way to advance medicine by providing researchers with a means to develop better medical techniques, discovering vaccines, and helping to find a cure for a disease. Regardless of how a person may view animals, they are worthy of better protection by our government and us as a society. Although some animal testing has been successful, there are research alternatives that could eliminate the pain, suffering, and deaths that animals endure in scientific research. Therefore, animals should not be used in scientific research
Animal testing has served many purposes in the development in medicine. Without the use of animal testing, humans would have no knowledge of the effects of a medicine, vaccine or product. The practice of using animals in research studies began with William Harvey's experiments in the seventeenth century. Harvey explained “By using different species to conduct his study, Harvey aimed to demonstrate blood circulation (Human Health).” Since then the abundance of animal research became the basis of medical, and scientific studies. Animals have made major breakthroughs in both the scientific and medical realm, however, the use of such testing is often considered inhumane and unjust. I will be evaluating
“Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year” (11 Facts). Animal testing is a very flawed creation in today’s world. This innovation has caused much harm to many animals while also hurting the opinions of animal activists around the world. Animal testing is also known as the use of animals in experiments and development projects usually to determine toxicity, dosing and efficacy of test drugs before proceeding to human clinical trials (Biology Online). The use of animal testing has been around for throughout all of history, it also carries its disadvantages as they diminish the lives of many animals along with their unspoken opinion while also having some advantages, and lastly this notion is very expensive (Scutti).
Observation and experimentation are how we as humans have been able to learn more about ourselves and the world and universe we live in. One of the most common methods of experimentation is animal testing. However, there are controversies surrounding animal testing. There are some that believe animal testing to be cruel and overdone, advocating for the eradication of the practice and further reliance alternative research methods. Groups like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and other animal rights advocates fall in this category. There are some that believe animal testing to be an invaluable resource and should continue, such as some scientists and research groups. However, there appears to me to be a consensus that is closer to the middle: the belief and understanding that while there are benefits to animal testing, there are flaws in the practice and there should be changes to increase its efficacy while we simultaneously explore alternate testing methods. Many scientists and the National Institute of Health (NIH) subscribe to this idea. I aim to explore the benefits, problems, and implications of animal testing in order to reach a more informed conclusion about a position that is most validated by the information I have used.