Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

Perhaps the most obvious defense against stronger restrictions of guns is the Second Amendment: “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms.” However, the phrasing of the statement—which conforms to the tendencies throughout the Constitution as a whole—is ambiguous. It signifies that the basic rights to own guns are constitutionally ensured, but its extent of regulation may vary depending on how the legislators see fit. Logically, under no circumstance does a civilian need to be in possession of military grade weapons. Neither hunting nor self-defense require guns of that standard. Similarly, there is the common phrase uttered by members

School should be a place of peace and opportunity, but gaps in the system of gun control threatens the safety of faculty and students. School shootings have killed a total of 297 lives, young and old (Slate Magazine). Gun control has been a continuous nationwide debate for many years. It seems that no one wants to take a stance against guns unless they are personally affected. In order to take control of the matter and prevent more incidents from continuing schools need to change. To achieve a safe environment in schools need to educate faculty, safe and students, heighten security, and assess mental health issues.

Every so often the media and news feeds flood with reports of a mass shooting. Families mourn. In the days that follow, calls to action can be heard, and there is a demand for change. Sometimes minor legislation passes, but in the United States extreme change is rarely seen. Other developed nations provide an opposite comparison. Following the Port Arthur shooting in Australia and the shooting in Great Britain, both countries organized for significant gun reform.

On October 1st 2017, Steven Paddock shot and killed 58 people at a country music festival in Las Vegas, Nevada. Over the course of 12 minutes, Paddock committed the worst mass shooting in modern American history. We must honor the victims and respect their memory, but we have to ask ourselves what we will do to prevent this in the future. The first and completely valid response to that question is enacting stricter gun control, but there is much more than that. We can increase funding for mental health treatment, we can take stricter security measures at hotels and concerts, however there is something major that needs to be changed that hardly ever gets talked about. It’s something that we are used to, that we have seen all throughout our

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” This statement, endlessly quoted and debated and parsed, stands as one of the fundamental pieces of the Bill of Rights. Countless debates on the national level have tried to decipher what exactly the “right to bear arms” means. When more and more innocent people are being killed at the hands of gun violence, it is time to evaluate our current lack of restrictions and checks on guns in the United States. The lack of restrictions on guns coupled with the fact that ordinary citizens can own assault rifles and military-grade weapons is an impetus for the gun violence that has become seemingly ubiquitous in the past years. The United

Breaking news, an “assault weapon” walked in a school and wreaked havoc creating the ninth school shooting we’ve had this year! You may be thinking, what, a gun with a mind of its own? Well, that is exactly the type of thinking the news and gun-control activists want you to have. I have never met a firearm who wants or even can shoot someone, have you? That leads us to think about who the real problem is with gun-control, the firearm, or the human? If these activists were to become successful, we would be able to see the effects. The consequences of people not being able to own guns would have tremendous effects on safety, such as self-defense, which is why laws should focus on placing more restrictions on who can get guns, strengthening the filtering system, and placing harder penalties for those who use guns wrongfully or who do not have the right paperwork.

Some pro-Second Amendment people claim that banning guns would be more dangerous to civilians. Critics of gun control contend that, “If guns were illegal, only those willing to break the law would be able to wield the power of a firearm” (Gun Control Laws). However, many mass shooters get their guns completely legally: and the Sandy Hook school shooting in 2012 was a prime example of this. According to the FBI,“[The shooter’s]'s guns had been purchased legally and registered by his mother, whom he shot and killed before carrying out the attack at the elementary school” (Gun Control Laws). If guns were restricted further, many of these shooters wouldn’t be able to get these guns legally, and it would be a lot harder for them to commit these crimes: many mass shooters stay under the radar before they commit their crimes. Potential mass shooter or not, however, there are certain guns that people shouldn’t be able to own. An associate professor at the University of Georgia School of Law, Sonja West, states that “Protecting the right to keep and bear arms is not the same as forbidding all regulations on that right. We can protect that right and still require background checks, permits, and training. We can still regulate when,

Japan, June 8, 2001, 10:15 in the morning at Ikeda Elementary School. Thirty-Seven year-old former janitor Mamoru Takuma entered the school with a kitchen knife and began stabbing numerous school children and teachers. “It lasted just 10 terrifying minutes, during which the intruder killed eight children, injured 15 other pupils and two teachers and further eroded Japan's confidence that it is immune to the violence that it associates with the U.S.” (Tim Larimer) This proves that people wouldn’t need a firearm to create chaos. Japan is one of the strictest countries about firearms. No one is allowed to own a rifle or assault rifle. The Japanese community is allowed only to own shotguns and air rifles, but the process to own one of these is a very long and hard process to finish. What this has to do with America is to give an example that you wouldn't need a firearm to create chaos bringing up the controversy about gun control. Because so many U.S.

Gun control will not protect United States citizens any more than having no gun control, it will keep the guns away from the responsibility, and do nothing to prevent criminals from obtaining them. Numerous natives and government officials trust that firearm confinements will diminish murder rates and wrongdoing greatly; nonetheless, this isn't the situation. If a citizen has the intent to commit a crime, then they will do what is necessary to get it done such as getting a gun. Even though it is illegal. They are already committing crimes so there are no consequences of getting a gun. Gun control laws will not protect this country because law abiding citizens will not obtain guns, but those citizens will not commit any crimes,

Since the ratification of the Constitution of the United States in 1790, people have debated and argued over the correct interpretation of its contents. This is especially true with the first 10 amendments created shortly after ratification to appease the Anti-Federalists. Perhaps the most contentious of these is the Second Amendment, which protects “the right of the people to keep and bear arms”. In the 21st Century there has been an increasing number of mass shooting by an individual or individuals and this has led to increased debate on the topic of gun control. I believe that gun control is an essential method of curbing gun violence and other gun related incidents. Firearm accessories such as suppressors and silencers as well as bump stocks are unnecessary for civilian use. In addition gun control laws would help to significantly lower the amount of shootings and other gun violence in the United States, as seen through other countries and their programs. Gun control laws are the only way to regulate and control the sheer amount of firearms in the United States, and can help to bring about the end of mass shootings.

The primary argument against gun control laws seems to be that supporting self-defense—in American culture, guns are seen as more of a symbol of self-defense and less as a symbol of violence. Over 6 in 10 Americans feel safer if there is a gun in their home; Dr. Nelson Lund of the George Mason University School of Law argues that “[gun control laws] interfere with the ability of law-abiding citizens to defend themselves against violent criminals” (Speiser,

“If a child can’t open a bottle of Aspirin, we should make sure that they can’t pull a trigger on a gun.”

Gun violence has prompted many debates about America’s love for guns and its impact on society. The United States has more private gun ownership than basically any other country in the world. The violence of guns has taken lives all around America and killed many US citizens. Including the Aurora movie theater Shooting, The Columbine Shooting, and the Arapahoe High School Shooting massacre. Personally weapons are generally classifieds within three broad categories: rifles,handguns, and shotguns. Shotguns and rifles are both considered a.k.a “long guns”. A semi- automatic weapon fires one bullet each time the trigger is pulled. And will automatically reload another bullet into the chamber ready to be fired. The fully automatic weapons often referred to as a machine gun. Will fire multiple bullets within a single pull of the trigger. Look here's my opinion on gun control. Laws for gun control ain't gonna work. To me guns aren't weapons they're tools that work as long as there in the right hands. But remember this, guns don't decide who lives who dies. People decide on who lives and who dies. So don't find another dumb excuse about why congress should make gun laws stricter. If you didn't know their is an unofficial slogan for the National Gun Association “ guns don't kill people, people kill people” (NRA). For the person who is reading this just stop and think. Shootings do not simply happen from the gun itself, but the person who has it's finger on the trigger. Now if you create stricter gun laws, it won't only restrict those who obey the law, but will also most likely increase crime even more. I'll give you an example, what if you're with your family at home eating dinner, and let's say you're all eating ribeye steak with mashed potatoes on the side with greens. And while you and your family are eating a man breaks down the front door with, let's say a glock 17c. What are you going to use if you don't have a weapon to disengage the criminal or robber that is coming inside the house. Look it doesn't even have to be a rifle. Simply just a small handgun. If you don't know how to use a handgun or rifle effectively there are classes you can take to better ready yourself just in case something terrible happens just

A controversial topic in today’s society is gun control. Gun control is not just one issue, it consists of many. Americans feel that the government is slowly taking control of their entire lives. Gun control, a topic that has been debated in government law making for a myriad of years, has been controversial to United State citizens who feel their right to bear arms is now infringed upon by government.

Although there have been a drastic number of people injured by misused guns, guns provide protection and the government should stay away from the second amendment and not pass anymore laws concerning gun control. Supporters of gun control always try and make the point that the second amendment does not give a license to the general public to own a firearm. The second amendment only gives that right to a well-regulated militia. A well-regulated militia is the safety of a free state which also happens to be the right of the people to own and bear arms. Gun control should not be the solution to higher crime rates, but more prisons, police, harsher punishments and protection. Guns are not the problem, firearms don’t kill people, people, kill people (Otfinoski 45).