Alex Nielson
Professor Belk
English 2010-H12
18 September 2017
Poverty: Choice or Lack of?
All throughout my life, I have been constantly reminded by my parents, teachers, and by various other authority figures to always make sure I am making good, educated choices in everything I do. Actually, that 's not completely true. I wasn 't just reminded to make good decisions, I was, and still am, expected to make good decisions. I was taught that my choices would determine where I ended up in life. Every choice has a consequence, whether good or bad, and I was to be held accountable for those consequences- whatever they may be- whether I liked it or not. I couldn 't blame them on anyone, or anything else if something bad happened, because
…show more content…
In other words, when you are broke, you are down at the bottom of a pit, but you 're not completely stuck. There are other items down there with you. You have the choice whether you want to give up and stay there, or use what you have to find a way out. You have the resources and knowledge with which you can build a ladder, climb out of that pit, and start living again. It 's your choice.
Being in poverty, on the other hand, is being stuck, really stuck, in the bottom of that pit, completely alone, with absolutely no way out- with the slight exception of an immense amount of outside help, which, sadly, will likely never come. It’s not your choice. It is the inability to provide, for yourself or your family, any of your most basic needs because you are deprived of the necessary access to education, resources, and the right opportunities- all of which are needed to allow you to rise above the impoverished situation you are in. "Poverty," as Nate Pyle muses in Making Poverty a Choice, "doesn 't come from a series of choices, but rather a lack of choices."
Look at it this way. If you are rich, you have a multiplicity of choices available to you. "Should we go to Paris this summer or Italy?" "Which Ivy League school do I want to pay for my kids to go to?" "Do we want a new yacht or another countryside estate?" Whatever choice you make, you don 't have to fight for it, it is readily available for you.
The further down the ladder you go, the fewer
Poverty, people are born into it. People can sink into its grasp, or people can escape. But it’s a hard journey. As for Kevin Powells mother growing up in the south she never saw money, for “at the age of eight in a field picking someone else’s cotton”. (p. 86) Being in poverty is based out financial needs, being poor is one thing. Poverty is just below that, for you barley have enough to get by and sometimes you are places in a setting that could risk health or safety.
In 1983, Raymond Carver introduced his short story “Cathedral” to the public. The first-person narrative takes place within the narrator’s home, where his wife is waiting upon the arrival of her blind friend Robert. The narrator, however, becomes more concerned about how Robert’s visit will affect him rather than enjoy the situation. Once Robert arrives, the narrator tries to understand the blind man, but he is unaware of what tasks Robert is capable of performing due to the narrator’s inability to “see”. In time, Robert shows the narrator the difference between looking and seeing through illustrations of a cathedral, drawn by the narrator with his eyes closed. “Cathedral’s” narrator exposes readers to anti-heroic views
When people hear the words “child poverty” some assume that this term may refer to homeless children who are living on the streets. This isn’t necessarily true, in fact some children who go to bed every night with a roof above their head still suffer from some form poverty. According to National Center for Children in Poverty (NCCP), 21% of children throughout the United States live in families who are considered poor. It is crucial for society to be more aware of this issue and to take part in contributing to help reduce child poverty within our country.
More than 44 million people in 2009 were identified as living in food insecurity, the USDA’s current term for going hungry (Imhoff 17). The government, nonprofits and other organizations have been drafting potential solutions for a while to solve world hunger, but the number of food insecure people is still exceptionally high and on the rise. The complete abolishment of it is presumably unattainable, but reducing it to a much smaller amount is certainly possible and a necessity. All American citizens are targets. One economic depression or catastrophic mishap may leave you in food insecurity and desperate need for help. So don't you wish our country has a well-functioning system able to support us all? The US’s main answer to food insecurity is the Farm Bill. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Programs(SNAP) is the major program contained in the bill. From 2008-2010, 72.3% of the farm bill and 53.1 billion dollars was dedicated to SNAP, and current enrollment in it is at the highest (Imhoff 52). Is SNAP the best solution to widespread hunger? Should the United States dedicate so much money in effort to it? “The current SNAP program is so deeply flawed, the United States should draft another “food stamp” policy and remove it from the Food Bill.
President Lyndon Baines Johnson launched the “war on poverty” during his speech at the State of the Union address in 1964. During this address his goal was to encourage everyone to join forces and to believe that ending poverty was possible. The 50th anniversary of this speech has brought various debates whether the plan instilled worked or failed and how much is the governments responsibility. One side feels the war was a success and notes the improvement made for many Americans and what could have transpired if this war was not declared. The other side will state that the war implemented failed although money was invested and that poverty is a social problem. They suggest that poverty and malnutrition existed in the 60s-70s but is not the case today. However, the war has not ended since poverty still exists fifty years later so changes need to be made.
The last time I saw Charlie outside prison walls we were on the run. Charlie was on the run, not I, I just went along for the ride because he was my husband. Charlie was on parole, but he loved to drink his booze. In our state it's a violation to drink while on parole.
Driving down the local china town in my area, a known site that inhabitants a large homeless population made me grasp a clear picture of how homelessness affects the community. The number of people without permit housing is increasing in the United States. The government should invest more resources to help the homeless population obtain jobs, temporary housing, occupational skills, and education.
The U.S. Census Bureau states, “Last year in 2015, approximately 47.7 million Americans or 14.8 percent of the population were living in poverty.” For many people in America being poor is becoming a way of life that seems like a bear trap for those that are caught in its grasp. It’s a reality that is faced by many Americans to this day. Being poor can not only be measured by the amount of money you have but also by the amount of freedoms you have. We must take the necessary steps to change the outcome of our lives to pursue freedom from this trap. While I concede with many of the reasons given by Barbara Ehrenreich, Linda Tirado, scholars, and politicians to help explain the continual cycle of poverty, I disagree that being poor is a lifestyle choice and this is evidenced by their lack of support for those individuals that climb the socioeconomic ladder, how they only portray the negative side of being poor, and how they only feed the idea that being poor is an endless cycle and this only allows us to blame to society rather than performing the necessary steps to remove ourselves from the equation for being poor.
Imagine walking down a dark and isolated pavement lost and confused about the life you are living, carrying what is left of you, scraps of clothing, that pair of shoes with wore out soles and what remains inside of that beat-up backpack that once have little to no value to you. Having nowhere to go, nothing to eat, no money to spend and having no one around you to help. Your one solution is to spend the night on the filthy sidewalks we walk on a daily basis. Carefully listening to the clamor and racket of cars driving as they honk and blinker their headlights. People walking down the streets with faces of pure disgust, sniffing the distinct smell that belittles you to feel homeless and unwanted. As the day comes to an end, you lay on a cold
As the morning sun rises, most of us awake to a day of never ending opportunities and possibilities to make a living of ourselves. But for others, the rest of the day only brings tension and desperation as they attempt to survive with barely anything. The condition or quality of being financially unstable; in need; inferiority; inadequacy; scarcity of the most basic necessities, this is known as poverty. To common folk, this term makes us naturally visualize adults losing a typical well paid job or home and simply transition to ‘being poor’. In the United States, poverty is mainly characterized in terms of income level and how poor adults have been perceived as different from the rest of society generally due to their lack of money and access to all the world.
Poverty, choice and scarcity are all terms that refer to a situation in which a person’s necessities are left unfulfilled, from which many countries are suffering from. A person in poverty is someone who is merely trying to survive. People in poverty may not even have the very basic necessities in life, including food, clothing and shelter. A person in poverty maybe homeless and may not have the
Who says no to free money? Well, apparently the Swiss do, and the reason why, may surprise you.
Why spend money that is really needed for other things? Why live uncomfortably? Why be trapped in this hole called a home that belongs to another person? Why not live free and peacefully? When a person rents he or she usually throws away money that could be used to purchase something that belongs to them. Money is not easy to come by so why pay out hundreds toward something that is not benefit to the person paying it out. There is no good explanation for making a decision like this. The best option in a situation like this is to buy a house. Buying a house is a better option than renting an apartment.
Poverty is a social problem that affects everyone on an economic, political and social level. The problem of human suffering is one that we must combat strategically on many levels. According to the United Nations, “in 2015 more than one billion people around the world live in a state of poverty, lacking the basic goods food, clothing, and shelter that humans need to survive” (“Poverty”). There are a great number of areas that keep individuals poor, such as lack of resources, inadequate income, lack of education, language barriers and the high cost of child care. Being able to work and provide basic necessities is our basic human right and we should not be deprived of these basic human rights that individuals need in order to live satisfying lives. The government has the responsibility of helping individuals in need with the economic assistance to feed, clothe, house, educate, provide health care and decent wages for every individual. They should ensure that individuals have access to resources that will help them build a better future. There are several ways that we can work together to strategically find solutions to end inequality among the poor individuals in our society.
The definition and viewing of poverty is a topic that many find highly debatable and close to the heart. Poverty is what most people see as not having enough to live on, and struggling to get anything more. Race and location are often looked at in conjunction to poverty. The author of the first article, McMillian, focuses on redefining poverty to a general audience by limiting her word choice and choosing a more personal appeal to the intended audience. In the other article, the authors Fram, Miller-Cribbs, and Van Horn write for an expert audience of social workers to frame the cause of achievement gap in U.S. southern schools by increasing their credibility through specialized language and resources. By examining the specialized language