Each year, more than 100 million animals are killed in the United States from animal testing. These animals are harmed or even killed more than half of the time that they are experimented on. These harmless animals are taken and forced into captivity for different kinds of testing from day to day. They are forced to stay in cages all day long and only get to eat what they are given based on testing for that day. Animals are just like people; they need to exercise, have interactions, be able to eat when hungry, etc., but laboratories take away these privileges from the animals by trapping them in the lab all day. Animal testing is wrong and harmful in many ways.
Animal testing is a common practice in current life that is necessary to ensure the safety of the humans that will be using the tested product. There are many good and bad aspects of animal testing, but the pros clearly outweigh the cons. Animal testing has been around since ancient
Weldon 1 Animal Testing Introduction Thesis Statement: Animal testing is wrong because it is inhumane, costly, and unpredictable. I. Animal testing is inhumane A. Torture B. Type of testing C. Effect on the animal II. Animal testing is costly A. The cost of testing B. The cost of research C. What else we could be spending money on III. Animal testing is wasteful and unpredictable A. Mass Murdering of animals B. Endangered species C. If it works on animals it may not work on humans Conclusion Weldon 1 Hunter Weldon Mrs. Smith 1st Period 1/6/14 Animal Testing Animal testing has been a controversial topic for many generations throughout the world. People against animal testing say that animal testing is cruel and inhumane and
This should be reason enough to end the madness of animal tests. Specific evidence points that animal testing should not be allowed; however the debate is also on moral grounds. Several people, about 60% of the population, agree that animal testing should be banned because it is just wrong. To be born into the world on a concrete floor and be made to lead a life with no freedom is worse than having no life. They have no chance to stop the pain or torment, simply because they are “just animals.” Animal activists and everyday people believe that humans are voices for the animals. Therefore, animal testing is considered ethically wrong and people should act as the advocate for the animals.
Initially you might believe that animals have moral rights. Animals tested are don’t even have the mental capacity to comprehend different objects, let alone what they’re going through. They just have similar features of a human, which outside of this scenario would be completely useless. Another argument might be how testing doesn’t have guaranteed results, but hurts organisms in the process. While this is true, testing has an 83.7% success rate, while taking in consideration animals that were too weak to live past a few hours. Taking note of how only a few hundred animals are tested on a year, that 16.3% is a minimal amount. This is all for the better of humans, and even animals. After all, animal products are created off of these tests too. The death of a few animals, is better for us, and the rest of
Asking just about any animal rights activists on the thoughts of animal testing, it is reasonable to expect that the majority of them would address crucial flaws in many of the laws in regards to animals and how animals are supposedly “protected” by these laws. Trained scientists and researchers take on the key role of testing on animals in laboratories and facilities throughout the world, using the excuse that we are expanding knowledge and furthering medical research. In the United States alone, there are very few laws truly protecting animals from the unnecessary amounts of suffering the research forces upon them with many exceptions. Additionally, in reference to the scientists who perform these tests, the author of the article,
If a person was to choose between a cat and a rat to experiment on, statistically, more people would choose the rat. What many people fail to realize is that all animals, no matter what type of breed, are being put in labs and being tested on every day. Around the world, there has been an on-going debate on animal testing. Many people feel as if animals' lives do not matter in the long-run. The increase in animal testing has grown at an upsetting rate. Animals have no voice, therefore, people need to stand up for them and do what is right. Putting animals through testing and experimentation is unjust.
Animal testing is often cruel and inhumane. The Draize eye test, used by cosmetics companies to evaluate irritation caused by shampoos and other products, involves rabbits being incapacitated in stocks with their eyelids held open by clips, sometimes for multiple days, so they cannot blink away the products being tested. We do this to test if a mascara is harmful or not is dreadful. The fact that this has ever been allowed is nauseating. Another example of cruel treatment is when scientists use MPTP to replicate Parkinson's disease in a Marmoset. If we don’t want to go thru the experiment ourselves, then why should we have a living being that shares 99% of it’s DNA go thru it. We need to enforce the rules we have on animal testing or not this will continue
To conclude I think that animals testing is wrong because it harms the animals and they don't have to test animals. There are many ways to test using computer models where no living being is harmed and it is more cost effective. The more we spread awareness of this terrible practice the sooner we can end animal
One reason that animal testing is horrible is that animals are not able to have a say about being tested on. Animals are not able to specifically say if they are in discomfort. Most of the time they are put through tests that can and will cause severe pain to them. Researchers discriminate against animals because they are not able to maintain the same cognitive abilities that humans have because they cannot speak, or have moral judgment, (Con Animal, par. 10). There is no need for about 56 billion animals to die from failed experimental testing. The majority of research animals used are killed during or after the experiments. Their lives are forcibly taken for poor research that could have been fixed with the proper information, (Con Animal, par. 9). Researchers use too many animals for testings whether it is for cosmetic or medical reasons, that will cost the
Animals have been tested for ever. They use to not have rights. Back in the day animals that are put into testing are not given rights. They are forced to do things that they don’t want to do forced to do something that will make them injured. A pro on animal testing is nearly 90% of scientist in medical lads believed that animals research Is necessary. Some scientists that work with animals don’t always work on the body they work on the mind
Animal testing is expensive and scientists should reconsider finding other ways to test their products. Not only do animals suffer but so does our economy. These tests are being funded by the federal government using the public's tax dollars and by health charities who are wasting considerate amounts of dollars on cruel and irrelevant experiments on animals that instead should be spent on human-based research. Scientists also have to pay for a lab to perform these tests the animals. Paying for a lab is an initial cost
Imagine yourself in a world with no animals – no birds chirping in the morning, no squirrels eating your flowers, no dogs or cats running around the house. Where did all of the animals go? They are all locked inside of cages in poor conditions in laboratories across the country. They wait in loneliness and terror to be called upon for testing. The conditions they wait in are enough to make them go insane. More than one hundred million animals die every year from animal testing. The Animal Welfare Act does not provide protection for ninety-nine percent of the animals used. The use of animals for the testing of products is a popular debate that has gained a lot of attention over the years. Scientists argue that testing products on animals is
Animal testing is extremely unfair for those animals, and it is a kind of cruel and immoral behavior. To be honest, we cannot ignore it. However, when it comes to animals having right to live, eating animals must be mentioned. I want to ask if you care about the feeling of the animals that you want to eat. Everyone wants to live longer, and there is no doubt that animals want to. If animals have right to live as human beings do, why do you eat animals like sheep and chicken? Humans are at the top of the food chain, so it is normal for humans to eat animals, especially the common animals whose number is very large. Those animals used to do research are usually rabbits, frogs and other common animals, and to an extent, animal testing is equal to eating animals. Eating animals can provide energy to our bodies, and sometimes animal testing can benefit mankind and save those who are going to die. We can accept eating animals, so why not accept animal testing? Besides, animal testing is much more beneficial than eating animals. Therefore, animal testing should be
First of all, animal testing is immoral and atrocious. According to the ‘US Department of Agriculture (USDA), in 2010, 97,123 animals suffered pain during experiments while being given no anesthesia for relief.’ From this, we can notice that a lot of animals are agonized and deteriorated. In addition, the environment of laboratories where animals live are extremely poor. For instance, all animals are locked up in small cages and animals’ limbs are chained tightly in severe cases. These examples show how animals are treated barbarously and forced by humans. Therefore, animal testing should be regulated and should keep safe of the animals in order to make the test less immoral.