Firstly, our current pharmacare system does not provide access to individuals who need prescription drugs and are unable to afford it (Morgan, Daw and Law 2014). Prescription drugs are inputs into the broader health care system. As such, if prescription drugs are taken on time, this allows the healthcare system to meet patient health needs (Morgan, Daw and Law 2014). Secondly, our current pharmacare system does not ensure that the financial costs associated with necessary medicine are equally distributed (Morgan, Daw and Law 2014). Unequal distribution of the costs of necessary medicine can further drive income inequality (Morgan, Daw and Law 2014). Also, employers are under no obligation to continue providing private insurance for their employees …show more content…
Firstly, all Canadians should have access to medically necessary prescription drugs (Morgan, et al. 2015). Studies show that 1 in 10 Canadians does not take their medicine as prescribed because of costs (Morgan, et al. 2015). In a few cases, Canadians do not purchase prescribed drugs because they lack adequate drug coverage. A national pharmacare plan would allow millions of Canadians access to medically necessary drugs.
Secondly, a national pharmacare program resolves the problems of underuse of needed therapy (Morgan, et al. 2015). The current system separates the management of medicine from the management of health care; consequently, this approach negatively impacts the safe and effective use of medicines (Morgan, et al. 2015). Studies reveal that one in three elderly Canadians receive prescriptions for drugs known to pose health risks for older patients (Morgan, et al. 2015). Canada needs a program to ensure the safe use of
…show more content…
2015). Costs such as administrative costs and drug prices are not streamlined to achieve better health outcomes for the amount of money invested in the healthcare system (Morgan, et al. 2015). Administrative costs, including patient enrollment, revenue collection, and claims administration are repetitive; consequently, this approach draws resources away from purchasing a national pharmacare program (Morgan, et al. 2015). In terms of drug prices, Canada is one of the most expensive countries in the world. Generic-drug prices in Canada are nearly double the prices found in other OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries (Morgan, et al. 2015). Healthcare systems in other developed
Lynas, K. (2010, November/December). Canadian pharmacists journal: Universal pharmacare could cut up to $10.7 billion from Canada’s annual drug bill. Notes, 143(6), 262. doi: 10.3821/1913-701X-143.6.262
Pharmaceutical spending in Canada has inclined rapidly over the years. Prescriptions drug spending in Canada has been inclined by several different factors. These factors have contributed to expenditure by the growth of the population, price effects volume effects and much more. The cost of drugs has affected the drug expenditures in Canada in several different ways. Some of the factors are international pricing, inflation, retail and wholesale markups. Introducing new products to the market has increased the drug expenditure while the generic brands have decreased. Furthermore, changes in price controls or extending patent legislation has prevented a less expensive alternative from coming to the market. Changes in policies like regulations,
In the first Hall Royal Commission, Pharmacare is outlined as recommend in joining the covered benefits for Canadian citizens - Canadians pays slightly less than their U.S. counterparts for Pharmaceuticals (Armstrong, p51). Privatization influences an unequal system - creating significant hindrances for impoverished people in Canada, again creating a rich-poor divide that does not influence equality, which is the essence of the Canadian Health Act. As pointed out in The Canadian Regime, “In European Countries, drugs are covered by public insurance schemes. Why not do the same in Canada?” (Malcolmson, p226). Further, Malcolmson describes the possibility for the government to generate a type of bulk buying scheme - where we as a country can
Canada’s system is another great example of the affordability of UHC. According to the World Health Organization, check-ups, medications and surgeries are thirty to sixty percent cheaper in Canada than in the U.S. (Merino 132). Why? Well, Diane Francis, author of the National Post article “LBJ Invented Canada’s Superior Health System”, offers one explanation. Francis argues that in Canada drugs are cheaper because Canadian provinces buy the drugs in bulk through a centralized system, unlike the U.S., which makes the government programs Medicare and Medicaid buy from different sources (Merino 132). Because of the monopoly the Canadian government has on the pharmaceutical industry, the price of drugs can be manipulated by the government, making
Although most Canadians and stakeholders consider the Canadian healthcare policy as universal, it is not comprehensive. A comprehensive healthcare policy should offer a complete healthcare package for citizens. The current healthcare policy in Canada does not substantially offer a complete healthcare policy. This is because various core areas of healthcare are not covered with the current policy on healthcare. The essential areas that have been left out by the policy include dental care, prescription drugs, and prescription glasses. The prescription drugs are more important as it remains hard for a person to recover without drugs. Drugs are very expensive to buy and they prices keep on increasing day by day (Morgan and Daw, 2013). The drugs are thus
The distinction of Canada’s healthcare system is it is publicly funded but privately delivered, where as the United States’s healthcare system is privately funded and privately delivered. This means every Canadian has the privilege to seek medical help outside of pocket. Although not all services are free such as drug prescription, doctor specialists, eye and dental exams, Canada’s health policy is absolutely better than of the United States. Based on the research, the US spends more on health
In Canada the services, medication and hospital fee are controlled by the government, this created a better outcome for the security of the citizen. This regulation can lead to major saving in term of the GDP per capita paid by the government in this regard. The government negotiates drug prices so by doing that prices are more affordable for the people. It’s not necessary the uses of co-pays and deductible, but if any type of charged for any reason this can still be a dissent price by the patient. As result of this Canadian are proud and feel secured by the contribution of the social
Prescription drug coverage in Canada is different for every province and has evolved over time , public drug plans fund only 38.3% of the total drug expenditure in Canada in 2012 which included the non-prescribed medicines(8). Every provincial drug plan available includes patient charges .the current patchwork of Canada includes a complex, 46 federal, provincial and territorial prescription drug coverage program (6). It varies in the type and level of coverage provided throughout the country as well as in the must pay out-of-pocket amount as the part of public prescription drug plan.
In Canada, drug spending is considered to be the second largest spending category of healthcare ("Protecting Canadians from Excessive Drug Prices", 2017). Ever since Medicare was established in Canada, health expensive has increased to about 16% ("Protecting Canadians from Excessive Drug Prices", 2017). Canada is found to pay way more on prescription drugs than compared to other developed countries ("Protecting Canadians from Excessive Drug Prices", 2017). Not only does the high expense affect the consumer, but it also limits the access to creating new medicines as well as having less resource in other areas in the healthcare field ("Protecting Canadians from Excessive Drug Prices", 2017). As of January 2016, the provincial, federal, and territorial ministers have planned to work together in order to improve the accessibility, affordability, and
Canada’s health care system “can be described as a publicly-funded, privately-provided, universal, comprehensive, affordable, single-payer, provincially administered national health care system” (Bernard, 1992, p.103). Health care in Canada is provincial responsibility, with the Canada Health act being a federal legislation (Bernard, 1992, p. 102). Federal budget cuts, has caused various problems within Medicare such as increased waiting times and lack of new technology. Another problem with Medicare is that The Canada Heath Act does not cover expenditures for prescriptions drugs. All these issue has caused individuals to suggest making Medicare privatized. Although, Canada’s health care system consists of shortcomings, our universal
According to an overview of Canadian poll surveying public opinion on their universal health care system, 88% of Canadians reported their value for a strong, national, and publically funded health system (Mendelsohn, 2002). Canada is one of the four nations that provide their populations with access to medical services through their universal health care system of 1984 (Bodenheimer & Grumbach, 2008). The Canadian health care system is unique in that it prohibits the private health insurance coverage for the fundamental services that are provided by the Canada Health Act; private insurance can be used as a supplement for services that are either partially covered or not covered under the universal health insurance (Steinbrook, 2006). Conversely, in the American health care system there isn’t a universal health coverage for the nation, but rather four different means of paying for health care which includes patient paying out of pocket for individual payments, individual private insurance, employment-based health insurance, and governmental supporting funding (Bodenheimer & Grumbach, 2008).
Canada 's healthcare system is praised globally for its universal and free healthcare. It started to take shape after World War II in 1945. Health insurance was introduced and was attempted, but was not successful even though there was an increase in the spending of health related services and goods. Fast forward a few years to 1961 where Tommy Douglas, the premier of Saskatchewan, developed the idea for an all-inclusive insurance plan. He later inspired the Medical Care Act in Canada in 1967, when he pointed out health care is a right for all Canadians. From this one thought, Canada has become of the many countries with a universal health care system. Ever since Tommy Douglas sparked the idea for health care coverage, Canada is praised for the way it carries out its system because of several key features. This system is publically funded, is universal and is accessible to everyone across the nation. Because this is a public system, funding comes from the tax payers and some federal funding, so there is no extra cost for the patients. Also, being a universal system it has offered care to all Canadians, immigrants and visitors. Unlike the U.S who does not provide healthcare to its entire population because it is a private system; access depends on how much someone could afford, and how
For the help with the rising cost of medication the FDA should allow Americans to buy their medication from Canada, where the cost is about half of the U.S. cost.
The comparison between health care in the United States and health care in Canada has been a continuing debate. America does not have a universal health coverage plan for it's population, while Canadians are privileged to have universal health coverage. Normally a patient will pay twice as much for health coverage in the United States compared to treatment in Canada. This puts the US in first position of having the most expensive health care system on earth. (http://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/health-care-for-all/has-canada-got-the-cure) Most of the population in the United States have no health coverage at all. Compared to Canada, the wait time for elective procedures in the United States is somewhat longer. Many Americans feel the
In this paper, the USA healthcare system is being compared to the Canadian healthcare system. The U.S. health system has been described as the most competitive, heterogeneous, and inefficient, fragmented, and advanced system of care in the