preview

Political Party Analysis

Decent Essays

Over the course of approximately 4 weeks, the discussion section I was a part of created a political party that would be our entry into the POLS 150 government simulation. Our party had a moderate ideology, which we believed would be best in order to give everyone comfort with things we did. This ended up being the what nearly all of the other parties did with the exception of one or two who chose to be center-left. We agreed upon votes being SMD with proportional representation as it seemed like the best option. We had a president and a prime minister along with a parliament. The president had a term limit of 5 years with 2 consecutive terms and the prime minister along with parliament members had 3 year terms. Our government would be a federal …show more content…

Through this collaborative effort by our party leaders, who believed that having a vote for each agreed article of the constitution in order to include everyone, we were able to build upon the overlaps between parties and form a government that represented what each party wanted. Some of the overlaps our party had with others included ideology, single member districts, term length for representatives, a federal system, a market economy, and protection of humans, including healthcare, and environment. The ideology overlapping makes sense as I’m sure nobody wanted to exclude others and being in the middle works for everyone. Single member districts for us was just the easiest option and we felt that it would be better in representing everyone. Our “representatives” had a 3-year term limit like many other parties had. We believed that this would be the best amount of time and also compromised between 2 and 4 years. The federal system allowed for more distinction in laws and having our economy based on the market appeared to be the best move. We chose to make it so that nobody was able to discriminate against anyone and also created an environment protection agency. Both of these were where we veered left in order to better fit everyone in. Now let’s jump to whether our party was able to get our position …show more content…

We chose to create our party with views that would work best for the greater mass of people as opposed to just one small group. Each of the other parties did the same thing. The final constitution included single member districts, 3-year term limits on the lower house, we had a unicameral system with 3-year terms, a presidential federal system, a free market, no discrimination, universal healthcare with a parallel private system, and an EPA. All of these were in some way positions we held in our own constitution, and many of the other parties reflected these same principles. So again I say, our positions would have most likely made it in the final constitution even without a party leader because of not only how moderate our party was, but also how moderate other parties

Get Access