It took four years to come out with a sequel to the original Poltergeist. In those four years, they had plenty of time to come up with some ideas and the end result of Director Brian Gibson's (taking over directorial duties from Tobe Hooper) Poltergeist II: The Other Side is a mashup of rehashed ideas and some truly creepy scenes, thanks in part to Julian Beck's portrayal of Reverend Kane and H.R. Giger's conceptual ideas for the ghosts/demons. It might not be as great as the first flick, but the film is fun enough to check out, and what better way to check it out then with Scream Factory's Collector's Edition Blu-ray release. Should you fork the money over, though? Read on to find out...
Movie Review
Picking up in movie universe time a year later, the Freeling family (minus their
…show more content…
On the living side, he is only able to take the form of the Reverend Kane, which in and of itself is creepy as hell, thanks to Julian Beck's riveting performance. On the "other side," though, the demon is witnessed in its full form as something straight out of Giger's head (which it actually was!)
Poltergeist II: The Other Side tries to introduce some new ideas, with the inclusion of the Native American character Taylor (Will Sampson), who is working with returning character Tangina Barrons (Zelda Rubinstein). He has dealt with some of this before and he knows what needs to be done to defeat the demon, which oddly enough, requires a process of two grown men sitting half naked in a sweat lodge.
The sequel also focuses more on the practical effects this time around, with some truly memorable moments. The puking scene involving Craig T. Nelson is fantastic in regards to the effects and the resulting creature that pops out, who will probably stay in your dreams for a few
In relation to several critical writings on the analysis of religion, the film Holy Ghost People by Peter Adair is aligned intricately into such discussions. Emile Durkheim states in The Elementary Forms of Religious Life that “religion is a natural expression of society” (Durkheim). Through Adair’s directorial decision to keep his own narration to a minimum, the audience is able to observe a personal account of a Pentecostal church community in a way that seems less studied and more like a natural expression of the church members. Durkheim also states that “when I approach the study of primitive religions, it is with the certainty that they are grounded in and express the real” (Durkheim). As Durkheim points out, if these people truly believe they are being possessed by the holy ghost, then they are experiencing it and it is therefore real to them. Adair allows the audience to experience the presentation of the possessions without any additional narration, and so these sections seem more like a natural part of this religious group as a whole to frequently believe in and experience possessions.
Both authors describe the devil similarly. When first encountered, they portray him described as a mostly normal person, with only a subtle clue to his
The novel and the movie were both very suspenseful. The main characters are both the same in the book and in the movie but are a little bit different then their counter partners in the novel/movie. In both the movie and
Now just to put this out there, yes! Of course there's going to be a lot of changes between movies from the past 59 years. They both have some ups and downs though. One good change between them I would say is the battle in the galleys. In the 1957 version, they showed mostly rowing inside the galleys. While in the 2016 version, it actually shows the battles that's going on outside the ship. It showed a lot more action than the original. One thing I did not like that was changed was certain events were taken out. In the 2016 version, they get rid of a large portion of the story of him saving the captain of the ship and was adopted after 3 years saving him as they did in the 1957 version. Instead they literally kill off the captain of the ship. Which also makes me want to talk about the characters between the two movies.
The Alienist is a crime novel by Caleb Carr first published in 1994. It takes place in New York City in 1896, and includes appearances by many famous figures of New York society in that era, including Theodore Roosevelt and J. P. Morgan. The sequel to the novel is The Angel of Darkness.[1] The story follows Roosevelt, then New York City police commissioner, and Dr. Laszlo Kreizler, as their investigative team attempts to solve gruesome murders through new methods including fingerprinting and psychology. The first murder victim investigated is a 13-year-old immigrant who has had his eyes removed, his genitals removed and stuffed in his mouth, and other injuries. The investigators deal with various interest groups that wish to maintain the status quo regarding the poor immigrant population in New York City.
Forgive me, i am the worst kind of horror movie enthusiast- I see a trailer on television for an upcoming release and i can't help but get giddy and declare "I want to see that!" without having any idea aside from the trailers; which are often misleading- what the movie is about. Thats my biggest problem as a movie viewer, critic, and person- in the case of 2011's Straw Dogs, this also led to a level of embarrassment on a first date, but we will get into that later. Unlike most people in the industry i like the idea of remakes- I actually believe they do more good then harm for a movie, because a second attempt can often allow a story to live up to its full potential.
The sequel was even better than the first. Evaluating it as a fantastic medical drama, bringing trauma and delight to the ever changing plot, never fails to thrill the reader through a roller coaster ride of suspense (Ufowriter, Amazon.com). But without a doubt his Alex Cross series is his best work. He creates a world that keeps building upon itself with each book. With each book the characters develop again and again. Enemies from past books will resurface to terrorize Alex once more. Old enemies will rise again and some main characters will die. He has even said that “I’m much heavier into the telling of the story and a little less careful with the writing of good sentences.� (Author & Artists, page 212) The series has changed the way an action/mystery novel is written today.
No one could compare to Bill Murray’s portrayal of a slightly crazy groundskeeper, who exhaustive quest to capture the groundhog was hilarious. They added too many new characters and definitely too many comedians to the mix for this sequel. You know what the say, too many cooks ruin the stew, this couldn’t be more evident in the actors who were tripping over each other ‘s lines in order to get a laugh. They need to stick have stuck to the physical comedy of the first movie and not relied so heavily on what they obviously considered big name attractions.
Standard A: Culturally-responsive educators incorporate local ways of knowing and teaching in their work. (ACEI 3.2) (ABTS 3)
An Executive Assistant plays a key role in any company. This individual not only assists with day to day operations, but most importantly one who can be trusted and relied on. Brooke Howell-Martin serves as a great example of an Executive Assistant as she’s extremely; organized, detail oriented, and goes above and beyond to accomplish goals.
The Alien is a science fiction horror movie. Its setting in space and the presence of technology and artificial intelligence empathizes on its science fiction genre. Moreover, the presence of the Alien and the fact that it is a threat to human lives reflects it is also a horror film. The movie revolves around seven human beings that have the mission to return to earth from the space.
‘Touching The Void’ is a documentary based on a true story about two men called Joe Simpson and Simon Yates who climbed on the west face of Siula Grande (6,344m) in the Cordillera Huayhuash in the PeruvianAndes. The first five minutes of the documentary is very effective because it draws you in and makes you want to watch the rest of the documentary, the director does this by using a lot of effective techniques. The techniques used are Photography, Camera angles, Music and sound effects, Narrative, Language, Tone and Structure.
As I looked over both Time and Rolling Stone magazines, I realized how different they are. Rolling Stone seems to have an edgier, more colorful scheme, while the Time has a harder, simplicity style. Rolling Stone is more focused on entertainment, pop culture, and the music industry. Along those lines, the magazine talks more so about celebrity news/gossip. The groups that I suspect to be reading Rolling Stone are younger, middle level income, a mixture of both female and males, and possibly more single individuals compared to Time.
In the movie of The Conjuring, in certain instances it foreshadows a witch which is considered as a dark presence. This movie poster is effective in introducing or raising awareness of the way is being presented by telling the readers that this film is based on a true story and by showing readers that it will have a mysterious person in search. In the movie, there is a new family of seven, five daughters and their pet dog that moves into an unfrequented farmhouse which took place in the '70s. Strange things have been happening to the house as well with the family, they call investigators to look at the house to find out why weird things have been happening. The reason for the dark presence, appearance in the house is because someone had hung themselves at the house so unfortunately the house is haunted without the new family members being aware of it. The poster for the movie The Conjuring foreshadows a mysterious dark presence not seen by everyone through the specific placement of the shadow, the color scheme, composition and spatial order.
Throughout the document, Mather is constantly depicting the Devil and spirits as very real, tangible enemies (e.g. descriptions of “invisible hands” and unexplained supernatural happenings), that were slowly infecting the Christian