Precious Gifts To American Generation Research Paper

Though it is a very long nonfiction book, I found myself unable to put it down. I cried a lot and literally laughed out loud while reading this book, and found myself extremely emotionally connected to Kunte Kinte. This book did meet and exceed my expectations. It was vey painful for me to read, yet I am beyond grateful that I was recommended to read it. The story-telling was so descriptive, it put a weight on my heart and made me think and contemplate about the book even when I was not reading it. I think the author did everything perfectly, and I have no critiques. I would like to thank the author for such an amazing historical account and piece of literature.

This essay, The Myth of the Model American Family, is a discussion of the concept of an ideal family in the different perspective specifically social, cultural and economic. This is also an attempt to identify the structural changes in relation to the global development and the international economic crisis that immensely created impact on their lives. However, the discussion will limit itself on the different identifiable and observable transformations as manifested in the lifestyles, interrelationships and views of family members and will not seek to provide an assessment of their psycho-social and individual perceptions.

In the article “The Greatest Generation: The Great Depression and the American South,” Jeffrey DeRoven analyzes the economic struggles of the American South during the Great Depression in order to figure out why some people refer to people from that time period as the “greatest generation.” Below, this paper overviews DeRoven’s thesis, purpose, stance, audience, usage of literary techniques as well as logos, pathos and ethos, logical fallacies, and ultimately concludes with an opinion suggesting that DeRoven’s analysis is mostly sound and useful, but limited in proving his thesis.

The author of An American Childhood, Annie Dillard, shows a great amount of admiration towards her mother’s personal qualities. Dillard looks up to the intelligence, energy, fascination, and confidence her mother conveys. Admiration does not always include imitation, but shows some kind of interest. Growing up alongside her mother formed her into the person she has become.

In The Greatest Generation Grows up: American Childhood in the 1930’s, Kirste Lindenmeyer argues that the children of the Great Depression were the targets of and influenced the social and political change during the depression. Lindenmeyer does this by using many first-hand accounts to support her claim. Lindenmeyer then uses the lack of work as a chapter to also support her argument. Another point that Lindenmeyer successfully uses is the change in educational policies and regulations to reinforce her claim on the political side of it. There is a point that can hurt some of Lindenmeyer’s sources is that some of her primary sources were taken note of many years after the Great Depression.

The traditional American family comes from the 1950s, when TV shows like Leave It to Beaver and Ozzie and Harriet were released. They were the model to follow and create the family that the myth promotes. Parents happily married, nice house in suburbia, and a harmonious home are common traits of the model American Family. The myth of the American family creates a template for other families to follow; however, it only reflects to Caucasian families and creates a disappointment on today’s society.

“The Greatest Generation” is a term used to describe the generation who were the children of the Great Depression and who became the adults of the Second World War (Brokaw). There may be strong reasons why other generations may be considered great. The generation born during the war undertook the task of putting a man on the moon. This is perhaps the most important of all human endeavors. They are certainly worthy of being considered great but not the greatest. In fifteen years America and indeed the world endured the crushing poverty of the Great Depression and the costliest war in all of human history. The enormous struggles and accomplishments of this generation is what makes it the greatest.

The first major liability of the United States was that no one had ever established a

The families in America are steadily changing. While they remain our most valued and consistent source of strength and comfort, some families are becoming increasingly unstructured. In the past, the typical family consists of a working father, a stay at home mother and, of course, well-rounded children. Today, less than 20 percent of American families fit nicely into this cookie cutter image. American households have never been more diverse. Natalie Angier takes stock of the changing definition of family in an article for the New York Times.

thing as a perfectly equal society. The reason being that no matter how hard you attempt to make

Since the founding of our government, we, the American people have done our best to work together and benefit society as a whole. Sadly, many people in our society today allow their differences to drive them apart, and cause unnecessary feuds simply because they do not agree with the beliefs or decisions another person makes. This occurs on a vast scale which ranges from Government officials to teenagers in High School. In order to better society, my generation should do their very best to learn to work together and accept other people, even if their race, culture, ideas, beliefs, and decisions are different than their own.

Throughout the history of America, the ability to overcome adversity has served as a defining characteristic of the people’s identity. The notion of being able to face and overcome challenges, despite the sacrifices or risks, persists to this day in the United States. From situations such as the war of Iraq to parents working several jobs a day to put food on the table, one conclusion seems inescapable: America’s current generation has, indeed, continued to defy the odds against them just as their ancestors in World War II had.

Silently they stand, tall, strong pillars of memory in a seemingly long since forgotten world. Rows upon rows of white marble glisten in the first rays of the rising sun. The shimmer of morning frost still graces their elegant arches as the brisk air begins to take on a slightly warmer tone. In this quiet hour, not quite night, yet still not day, one lone man stands respectfully next to a small, almost insignificant grave stone. His head hangs slightly bowed, and except for the small hunch in his back, he stands at perfect attention.

A world where we can live authentically and unapologetically, and celebrate the fact that others are living the same way. If I were to frame the question differently, I would really be asking what a world without exploitation of power imbalances would look like. As I type this question, I have Pandora playing in the background, and I realize that John Lennon is singing his song, “Imagine”. I take a moment to marvel about the timing, I listen to his simple words, “You may say I'm a dreamer, But I'm not the only one, I hope someday you'll join us, And the world will be as one”(Lennon, 2000) and I smile. Is it possible for there to be a word without oppression, a world that operates without the exploitation of others? The discussion of a Utopian society has been written about since Plato first wrote about it in The Republic. It is a timeless question, one that is revisited time and again. I think that is a testament to our desire for improvement, it illustrates that we are continually striving for a better

Americans are eating their way to the grave. The American diet has changed dramatically over the years and this change is killing a nation. An American family 100 years ago would get everything they ate from their very own backyard. They farmed the land they lived on, grew their own fruits and vegetables, and even raised their own chickens, cows, and pigs. Whatever their family didn’t need was sold to a neighbor or people close in their community. 100 years ago there was no such thing as genetically modified food. 100 years ago millions of people a year didn't lose their lives to cancer. People didn't die because factories were unsanitary and people didn't die of preventable foodborne illnesses. There was no such thing as foods