preview

Prescriptive Effects Of Ideology And The Weapons Of Mass Destruction

Decent Essays

A leader cannot call something a “genocide” and then walk off the public stage without doing anything to help because terminology does not just have descriptive qualities but prescriptive qualities as well. The term Weapons of Mass destruction is limited to a select few innately powerful weapons, whose deployment is controlled by a single or small group of people and that when deployed can kill a monumental number of humans. This definition is very precise for a reason, these weapons must be dealt with differently because responsibility for mass casualty when using a WMD lies with the leaders instead of the masses. Leaders are solely responsible for the decision to take a large number of human lives. The term Weapons of Mass destruction should not be expanded to include ideologies and more primitive weapons, for unlike those already apart of the definition, ideologies and primitive weapons are only so destructive when chosen to be used by the masses. By expanding the term one is expanding an expectation that WMDs should be evaluated on the macro level. This is harmful to it would conflate the importance of smaller-scale choices, thereby misrepresenting history and hindering the world's ability to learn from such mistakes. Ideology is the excuse and primitive weapons the tool by which the masses create destruction- they are not weapons of mass destruction themselves- but part of systems that create similar effects. Since distinction is vital to effectively understanding and

Get Access