President Truman And The Dropping Of The Atomic Bomb

One of the most controversial and heavily scrutinized issue of the twentieth century was President Harry S. Truman’s decision to unleash atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. The motives behind Truman’s actions are shrouded in controversy as top military officials publicly denounced the use of such a disastrous weapon. There is overwhelming evidence supporting both sides of the decision, as historians are split in opinion. The United States had been using conventional bombing to try to push Japan over the edge to surrender, but with countless Japanese civilians loyal to their country, invading Japan proved to be more problematic than first thought. Harry S. Truman made the ultimate decision of dropping the atomic bomb in hopes that it would end the war, but the amount of casualties caused by it has historians questioning if it was morally right, “The bomb was unfortunate, but it was the only means to bring Japan to a surrender,” historian Sadao Asada states (Bomb 9). Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were justifiable because they would ultimately lead to the end of the war and would demonstrate U.S. supremacy.

In the 1930’s and the 1940’s there was a change in American leadership. Having this change not only changed the outcome of the war that we were currently in, but how the rest of the world would view our country after the war. The decision that Harry Truman was forced to make on the choice to drop the atomic bomb or to attempt more land invasions was a choice that shaped the outcome of the war. There were major influences and side effects from the dropping of the atomic bomb and what it did to the country of Japan. Having the option and the weight of the moral decision weighing on Truman’s shoulders about what decision should be made, he was the only one who was capable of making the decision that shaped the outcome of the war. Having dropped the bomb on Japan, as a statement of power and a means to an end in a form was the only way that American lives could have been spared as comparing that to the lives that would have been lost in a land invasion. Knowing what the issues with the bomb was; one has to look at the moral issues, the results of the incident, and also how it played in the rest of the development of the world.

Imagine yourself making the toughest decision in your life, whether sacrificing a million of our men and thousands of war ships and plans, verses several thousand of Japanese civilian populists. This decision was on the shoulder of Harry S. Truman, the United States President, who had to make this decision by deciding whether or not to drop a newly designed weapon. The atomic bomb was tested in the sands of New Mexico, where it proved to be very successful. Harry S. Truman made a very successful decision, because he wanted to end the war quickly, show others that the United States had power, and the retribution of Pearl Harbor.

The actions and decisions made by the United States President, leader of the free world, are subject to be analyzed, scrutinized, and debated for the rest of eternity. These decisions are how that man will be judged. Out of the 44 men to hold this honored position, one man, Harry S. Truman, made several proclamations such as the institution of Desegregation in the US Military, the dropping the atomic bombs, and the declaration of the Martial Law, which forever changed our society and the world as we know it.

Many debates have been provoked based on President Truman's decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. The debate is not solely based on the bomb being dropped, but more on the actual necessity and intention of the bomb being dropped.

The development and deployment of the atomic bomb by the United States towards the Japanese raised a number of issues that still remain relevant today. World War II was tentatively beginning to conclude when the prospect of dropping the bomb was considered; this consideration led to much controversy and thought from scientists and the president. Leading up to this final decision, the scientists and the president did not share perfectly identical views regarding the drop; though they did come to the same final conclusion, part of this being due to the fact that their jobs are not identical in requirement for what must be considered. Though both the scientists working in the Manhattan Project and President Harry S. Truman held reservations

During WW2 Truman, the United States President at the time, was asked to make one the toughest decision in History. Choosing between dropping an atomic bomb or invading are both choices that will result in a lot of deaths. The huge diffrence between the two was who died wether it be the Japanese with the bomb, or the American soldiers with the invasion. Trumans decision was supposed to end the war sooner, hence reducing the amount of agony,deaths, stress or any other negative effects that could result in the continous war. Truman's decision on dropping the Atomic Bomb's was an efficient course of action for the Americans, but was deffinantly not the most educated decision. If I had been placed in Truman's shoes and had to make this

The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are generally seen as successes in Truman’s presidency, although there are a large number of people who see it as a failure as well as a horrendous crime against humanity. However, by making the decision to

As a person, sometimes, is hard to make decision that can change history, it is even harder for the president of the United States. When you are the president and there’s a war occurring you must understand that every decision you make impacts the country in every way. When another country attempts an attack on your country, as a president you need to make the best decision to overcome the attack and to protect every citizen of the country. These are the decisions that President Franklin D Roosevelt had to make it, however, when he passed away, Harry Truman had control power of the country and knew that he had to avenge Pearl Harbor. Before Truman can avenge Pearl Harbor, Albert Einstein endorsed a letter to President Roosevelt alerting him that there was an “extremely powerful bombs of a new type” and that the U.S. should begin a similar research. Eventually, this became the Manhattan Project, discovering nuclear fission as a weapon. In this essay we are going to speak about the decision that Truman made to drop the bomb, some arguments, and the interpretation.

President Truman did the right thing about dropping the Atomic Bomb. Truman wanted to end the war because the American soldiers were losing their lives. Before Truman dropped the Atomic bomb, he warns Japan he was going to drop it if they don’t surrender. Japan still doesn’t surrender, after warning Japan, he drops the Atomic bomb and nearly kills about 84,000 people, 14,000 people injured and over 250,000 building destroyed. The Atomic bomb made a “Mushroom clouds” the ashes from the atomic bomb was so high you couldn’t even see the light. When the bomb dropped it was very hot and people kept breathing hot air. Many people were left with burn marks and with mental issues because of what they saw.

The sources used are a variety of books and academic articles which explain differing reasons on Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb. The sources drawn on also include The Private Papers of Harry S. Truman and his letters to his wife. The publication dates range from 1965 to 2013. As this essay explains alternative factors which influenced Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb, it draws especially on the words of Truman and the words of his Secretary of State, James F. Byrnes. The historian Gar Alperovitz challenges the traditionalist perspective, that the bomb was dropped to end the war without the casualties of a ground invasion, claiming that Truman had political intentions when deciding on using the bomb against Japan. Historians,

Presidents Harry Truman’s decision on the dropping of the atomic bomb was the best decision he could make because having another land invasion similar to D-Day of June 1944 would risk more resources and soldiers’ lives on either side.

The decision to drop atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War Two is a very controversial topic, Many people think it was too harsh and had too many bad side effects or bad consequences, but still there are others who still think it was a good idea and believe that it helped america through the second world war. The other two choices he had were to execute Operation Downfall. Operation Downfall was the proposed invasion of Japan. Or he could Blockade Japan, this would mean he would block the shores of Japan and prevent them from getting any new supplies, and wait for them to surrender to the US.

PRESIDENT TRUMAN’S DECISION TO DROP THE ATOMIC BOMB 2 President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki An examination and assessment of his decision. Why decisions are made are as important as the results they produce. Some people perceive the reason for making a decision to be very clear, but that is not always the case. For example, a parent may decide to do unthinkable acts if it meant saving his child.

file, President Truman of the United States decided to drop an atomic bomb on Japanese’s