preview

Pros And Cons Of Dalai Lama

Decent Essays

While these two viewpoints are incredibly different, points can be taken from both in order to achieve a compromise that promotes humanitarian values and morals without risking the sacrifice of security and culture. I think that the most important thing that the Dalai Lama’s argument proposes is not condemning our fellow man. This is not to say that everyone you meet in life deserves the compassion he suggests to show, but not passing judgment on someone without due cause is a staple of western society. He is right to say that we should not abandon this just because those being judged come from other parts of the world. In turn, the self fulfilment and happiness that come from being a more loving and compassionate person gives enough reason …show more content…

The easiest way to achieve this is to actively support and encourage a more inclusive integration process. While refugees are a special scenario, if someone immigrates to a country they will, for the most part, want to become part of that country. If we as a whole are able to encourage this smooth integration without asking someone to denounce or cut back on as big of a part of their life as religion can be, Islamification will be a thing of the past. By promoting a unity of religions, not separate sects of them, none will feel oppressed or unheard in their country and feel the need to take matters into their own hands. Clearly, the solution here is simply creating a balance between the two opposing viewpoints. This compromise will take the strengths of each argument and remove the totality and radicality from them, making it by far the most logical course of action to be taken. We, as a human race, need to promote a society which accepts all religions, but does not allow them to be involved in policy making or other government proceedings in order to create a sense of security and structure while allowing for compassion and happiness for all

Get Access