preview

Pros And Cons Of Filibusters

Decent Essays

In 1789, the Senate and House of Representatives ordered a rule where only a majority vote was needed to conclude a debate. Although the House of Representatives kept that rule, the Senate got rid of it in 1806 without replacing it with another. This soon led to the opening idea of a filibuster. The initial purpose for a filibuster was to ensure that the minority opinions were apprehended and understood. Currently, some people still regard the filibuster as a strategy to protect the right of free speech and minorities. Others use the tactic to waste time for other matters which leave bills grid-locked. Nevertheless, the policy is used in order to block a bill, amendment, or any other resolution to prevent it from becoming a final vote. During a filibuster, the senator has several rules and regulations to follow. There is a …show more content…

He went on to state that the legislature will not be brought down by the opposing side or the pro-choice. Governor Perry declared that the citizens of Texas have chosen the legislation to carry out laws and the supporters of pro-choice are becoming an obstacle. He continued by stating that too much work has been left undone. For the Republicans as well as Governor Perry, the work has just begun. They will stop at nothing to give up on the bill. They truly believe it is their duty to enforce such a harsh law. Their ideology is that because Texas is a conservative state, they have to get rid of abortions in the state. Even though the public is constantly protesting the bill, Governor Perry continues to believe it is in the citizen’s best interest Governor Rick Perry plays the major role in assuring that the bill does in fact get passed. He has shown that he will stop at nothing to thwart the bill. His actions in making sure the bill is approved are extremely unnecessary and uncalled

Get Access