Vote for her as president, she provides better healthcare. Vote for him as president, he would make a more vigorous tax system. The classical saying heard during election time. People line up at 6 am to fill their ballot for the next president. But there is a catch that is not technically would could help your candidate win. The electoral college represented by the population. The two party system is a political system that is still here today. What the electoral college is the body of people representing their states of the US. They cast their votes for the president. The number of electoral college depends on the population of that state. The candidate who becomes president needs to get 270 electoral college votes. The Winner-take-all is whoever wins the most votes wins all the delegates. The Wasted Vote theory is when voters pick one of the major parties. They think that their vote for the independent party wouldn’t matter according to how popular they are. The Democrats are people who support what a democracy stands for. The Republicans are people who elected individual who represent the citizen body. Checks and balances are a way to much sure that one part of the government has too much power. Our government needs this systems for our nation to continue our regime. The electoral college shouldn’t be abolished because its has a stable 2 party system, it provides a guarantee for the results of the final president, and its supports what our democracy is. Moreover,
For as long as American citizens can remember the assigned method of election for the United States presidency would be the use of the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a process not a place or institution, in this essay I will briefly describe the Electoral College process as well as describe some pros and cons of the electoral college and lastly, I will attempt to answer the controversial question, if you could improve the electoral college, would I choose to abolish or reform the system?
The Electoral College has been instituted since 1787 and is a group of people that elect the United State President and Vice President. The United States citizens do not directly vote for the president, but their vote is considered by electors that have pledged to vote for the winning candidate. There are 538 electors which corresponds with the 100 senators and the 435 representatives plus 3 electors for the District of Columbia. An elector is nominated or appointed by their state’s party and are usually well connected. Congressmen and high ranking U.S. officials are prohibited from being electors. In most states they follow a “Winner takes all” format, where the elector votes for the candidate who wins the popular vote. The Electoral College systems is outdated and illogical for the present and should be abolished.
Research suggests that the Electoral College system should be amended because it poorly illustrates democracy, is outdated and
The Electoral College was created in 1787 to protect this country’s voting system. It is a group of 538 members that directly cast the votes to determine who the next president will be. (Green) However, the issues of the present day can’t help but wonder, is the Electoral College’s system outdated and corrupt? My dialogue’s purpose is to defend the Electoral College and show how it still protects us to this day by using evidence from the most recent 2016 election, and prove that it gave us the best candidate suited for the role of the President of the United States.
Every time there is an election in the United States, the debate of Electoral College always heats up, and suddenly everybody seems to know about or at least they are interested in learning about it. The Electoral College is firmly established under the United States Constitution to elect the president and the vice president of the United States indirectly. A slate of “electors” are chosen from each state, and they are the ones responsible for voting for president in the general elections depending on which party the candidate is vying with. From this statement, what it means is that one does not choose his or her preferred leader directly and this has made many suggestions that the Electoral College is not a true representation of democracy. This paper will look at the strongest arguments for and against the Electoral College, analyze whether the current Electoral College should be re-engineered or scrapped in favor of direct vote and finally determine if the Electoral College is consistent or contrary to democratic principle.
Our Founding Fathers had great concern over the topic of the government obtaining too much power over the people and with that in mind they constructed a system of indirect election where citizens would choose an elector. That system would distant the citizens from directly electing the president, avoiding any possibility to create tyranny. Their fears were about whether citizens could exercise the best judgement and their capability to fully understand and make good choices in voting. They did not want a group to go off in the wrong direction and take control over others. They thought that a chosen group of more educated and elite individuals elected by the people would be able to better interpret the situation and exercise better judgement. In a way, they were trying to safeguard democracy by instituting the Electoral College as the method to elect our presidents.
“I’m sorry we ever invented the electoral college” Al Gore. Many think the electoral college is a great thing, others? Not so much. If you’re unaware of what the electoral college is, it’s a process, not a place. The founding fathers established it in the Constitution as a compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens. There’s pros and cons of the electoral college, and by the end of this essay you may decide if you’re for or against it.
In the United States, the Electoral College determines the victor of a national election. Each state has its own number of electoral votes, which is determined by state population. This system is a “winner takes all” system. Which means the candidate with 50 percent or more of the votes in an individual state gets all of that states electoral votes. The 2016 presidential election will have 538 electoral votes, this means that the election will be decided who is the first candidate to 270 votes. Some people have seen this system as outdated and unjust. Many are looking at a way to change the system and others would like to do away with the system
The Electoral College what can I say to be honest, I know nothing about the Electoral College, but I will do my best to explain it to people who might know and to help them know so when they 're seventeen they know like I should. So the Google definition of the Electoral College is a body of people representing the states of the US, who cast votes in the election of the President and Vice President. I would have not given that explanation, it would have told you it is a College. So helping you and myself, I will first explain how it works, then how Electors are selected, and the qualifications to be one and their restriction on who the Electors can vote for. Then the Election 1800 and the 12th Amendment. Then I will explain times where
For hundreds of years, the Electoral College has been the way that we elect our President and Vice President. Recently, people have begun to question this system. Many people would like to abolish the Electoral College. The Electoral College should be abolished because smaller states have a disadvantage, a president can be elected even if he or she does not represent the majority of the people, and people may feel marginalized due to the “‘winner take all’” system.
Those who are for the Electoral College have their own interesting host of points to make on the subject. They make mention of it contributing to the cohesiveness of the country, that it enhances the status of minorities, that it encourages political stability, and that it maintains a federal system of government and representation (Leip) . Regarding the Electoral College affecting the cohesiveness of the country, the concern is that without the Electoral College states with lower populations are devalued and that having the college ensures that they have some value and stake in its votes towards the election. This makes some sense, but it is just worth noting that the votes of the college are determined in some degree by population anyway.
A.) The Electoral College represents an indirect democracy and it is understandable why this measure was added. The Founders had a lack of trust in the judgment of the people and believed that a well-spoken individual could fool the people and win the election. This doubt was not unreasonable; many Americans were poorly educated in that time period. The Electoral College has citizens cast ballots on “electors” who pledge to vote for their party’s ticket. The Electoral College should be eliminated because it a less democratic procedure and it gives disproportionate attention to the swing states and populous states. Firstly, the Electoral College is outdated and anti-democratic. American citizens do not need to vote for a “middle man” to do their selecting for them; they should be able to choose who they want. Most Americans have a decent education and deserve truly representative
A Congressional Proportional method is another alternative being proposed in opposition to the Electoral College. A Congressional proportional method would allocate votes based on the winner of each congressional district. It would also award the winner of the overall popular vote in each state two electoral votes(senators). Once again on the surface this system looks fair and reasonable, but if you investigate deeply it can be seen that there is one glaring flaw in this system. The act of Gerrymandering which is used throughout the United States in every state is when the authority in each state decided which way the districts will be drawn. In simpler terms an authority could draw district that would exclude certain type of voters to increase
The 2016 presidential election was an example of the discrepancy between the Electoral College votes and the national popular votes. If the last presidential election had been decided by a national popular vote, then Hillary Clinton would have won the presidency because she had the majority of votes. However, due to the design of the Electoral College, Donald Trump won the election for president in 2016; although, he lost the national popular vote. Just as some people questioned the effectiveness of the Electoral College during some of the previous elections, several people questioned the effectiveness of the Electoral College again in 2016. The debate about whether the Electoral College should be kept or
These 29 representatives are then sent off along with the other 509 from the rest of the country to vote for who the next president will be. The catch is, although the idea of the Electoral College’s is to vote for who the majority in your state has voted for it is not technically mandatory, meaning they have the ability to vote for whomever they chose. Moreover the Canadian system proves to be much more effective for various reasons such as the use of MP’s that represent a geographical population rather than area. Elected members represent cities and towns instead of representing parties and labels. Voters have the ability to choose between party leaders and representatives rather then parties. The Electoral College idea allows for the possibility