Protect America but Stabilize the World
The United States of America has a great influence and a resounding presence in world affairs. No matter how small an U.S. action is; the impacts and ramifications are felt worldwide. Therefore, the foreign policy of the United States must take into account the worldwide consequences of its actions, but also should not ignore American interests both at home and aboard. The United States must encourage global efforts to combat environmental degradation and terrorism, while seeking to protect the American economy and world stability. The principle focuses of interest should be rebuilding the military to recreate a powerful presence on the global stage, saving the American economy, reinforcing global security,
…show more content…
Pakistan and North Korea are the center of U.S. concern involving nuclear weapons. Pakistan, as of 2011, has 90-110 estimated nuclear weapons stockpiles (The U.S. 32). As a result, the United States has offered both military and economic aid to Pakistan, and in return, Pakistan has claimed to be a U.S. ally in the Middle East region. In recent years, the always unstable relationship has deteriorated even more. “The United States has cut both military and economic aid to Pakistan sharply in recent years, reflecting mounting frustration among a growing number of officials with the nuclear-armed country’s support for the Taliban in neighboring Afghanistan,” (Ali). The United States has become too tolerant of “allies of convenience”, such as Pakistan. The U.S. should adopt a new policy in which Pakistan must agree to denounce the Taliban and rigorously fight terrorism inside their boarders. If Pakistan fails to comply, the United States should withdraw all military and economic aid. The risk in this aggressive policy includes, “worry that weapons may fall into the hands of extremists in Pakistan,” (The U.S. 34). If the United States cuts all aid to Pakistan, there is a chance the semi U.S. friendly government could collapse. This collapse would put the 90-110 nuclear weapons stockpiles at risk. Although this …show more content…
“We globalized the world. And what does that mean? It means that we extended cooperation across national boundaries; we made the world more cooperative,” (Tabarrok). The new “America First” foreign policy is a step in the right direction for the wellbeing of the United States, but the U.S. should not let it be a step backward on the global stage. The interconnection of countries is a positive development in this century, and together the nations of the world have the opportunity to do great things. Saving a dying environment and promoting world health are areas in which the world should have no problem coming together. “Every day, an average of about a quarter-million people worldwide graduate from extreme poverty,” (Kristof). The world is becoming richer and heathier, and the United States cannot abandon its role as one of the world’s
September 11th was one of history’s toughest days because it changed the world in so many
In order for the United States to cohabitate with the upcoming global giants, it has two choices: stay the same and fall belly up, or rediscover its purpose. In order for the United States to continue to succeed it must follow a strict guideline of rules. The US must “Choose” the important issues to address instead of attempting to address them all. This is impossible without the required resources to tackle so many issues. The US must “Build Broad Rules not Narrow Interests,” meaning it must recommit to international institutions and mechanisms. The US must “Be Bismarck, not Britain.” Washington is currently suited to play a Bismarckian role amount major powers in the global system. Zakaria states that
The notion that we do not need foreign policy, or that it is an antiquated concept is greatly misleading. In fact, we need a strong foreign policy now more than ever. We are living at a time when the world’s geographical divides are shrinking due to ever increasing advancements in communication, technology, trade, and a strong global economic interdependence. Even though the notion that we are somehow economically dependent upon other countries is not something new for the US, we still see a strong indifference to foreign policy. In order to understand the problems, let us take a step back and examine the history of US foreign policy.
Ever since its rise to global power in the early 20th century, the United States has been involved in countless foreign affairs. Said involvement has really influenced how the United States should look at foreign affairs today. In essence, being the lone Superpower of the modern world, the United States acts like the World’s Policeman. While on paper, this idea of having a World Policeman may seem like a great idea, since there will always be that one nation standing by with the intent of protecting shared ideals around the globe. However, actually putting this idea into practice says otherwise. Taking a look back at the outcomes of recent military interventions, specifically the Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq wars, the
However, both rely on how the U.S. came to be what it is today: power. Thus, power is an American virtue. Although the world is changing, this phenomenon is not new. There will always be a new thriving nation, a devastated one, new technology and science, but what doesn’t change are the lessons learned from our unique history. Power is what has guided the U.S. from its past and into the current world order. These two conflicting ideas also resemble two types of power that can make up a U.S. foreign policy. In a world transformed by globalization and terror organizations, it is important to develop a foreign policy strategy that reflects the context of modern society to protect American
The greatest American foreign policy objective is to ensure the protection of the American citizens in every possible way. The united states, however, have a very rich international history. The 19th century began with the United States asserting herself much strongly as the world’s superpower. In so many ways, the US remained a world power throughout the 1890s. towards the end of the 18th century, the country was considered the world’s pre-eminent power.
With the US being a leader on the global scale militarily and economically, Trump has come into office with a new vision, a somewhat controversial one. This essay will critique Trump’s controversial foreign policy objectives
Foreign Policy, is government’s strategy in dealing with other nations, designed to achieve national objectives. America’s Foreign Policy is determined how America, conducts relations with other nations around the world. It is designed to achieve certain goals. It shows the power to protect and project America’s national interests around the world in political, economic, military, and ideological areas. America’s Foreign Policy today covers a wide range of functions and issues. It includes establishing and maintaining diplomatic relations with other countries and international organizations, peacekeeping functions, such as working with allies to assure regional and international security, furthermore, it covers a range of international economic
The United States, throughout the course of its history, has attempted to steady the dynamic global climate in eras of strategic change. Examples of this abound: post-World War I, the post-Vietnam Cold War, and even the current post-long war environment. However, it is arguable that no era of strategic change was more critical to the development of contemporary international security than the interwar period between World War II’s end and the rapid communist advance across the 38th parallel that initiated the Korean War. Yet similarities exist with our current age, and one would be remiss to discount the invaluable experiences garnered during such a transformative period in global history. Comparatively, and based on current concepts and amphibious
Many leading political analysts have agreed that the Trump presidency has marked a change in the American public's opinion on United States involvement in the rest of the world, the first shift post-Cold War. They are in agreement that Trump’s rhetoric has been reminiscent of the “American First” movement that supported an anti-interventionist policy pre-World War 2, but they are decidedly not in agreement about where the United States should go from here. Some believe that the United States should focus on rebuilding the State Department to encourage diplomacy, others believe that “America First” is the right approach, some believe that the US should continue support of trade agreement and involvement
US Historical Relationships with Political Regimes in Africa and the National Security Strategy: Rwanda and South Africa
The “Washington Rules” project of US foreign policy has managed to sustain and regenerate itself since the end of World War Two. According to the theory of “Washington Rules,” the world must be ordered by the United States and cannot be permitted to order itself. This notion is considered to be a self-mechanism; the United States has a duty and moral obligation to be the world’s policeman to the point where other nations just naturally expect us to act. Nonetheless, we sometimes forget that by following “Washington Rules,” we do not follow the limit and extend our powers. As a result, there are “blow backs” when the United States attempt to control the world; as seen by the Cuban Missile Crisis and 9/11.
As the words spoken by Samuel Adams, “If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin” (Kehr). Our founding fathers, had built this country on the few basic principles of liberty, freedom, equality and happiness. It is our responsibility as citizens of that country to make sure that we not only protect it, but the liberties and freedoms bestowed upon us by our country also. Learning about the government and our America would help make sure that whenever a time of need were to arise we would be able to stand up and protect our country.
From the signing of the declaration to the election of President Barack Obama, America has faced both change and adversity. For better or worse, the United States has dealt with these obstacles, many times putting foreign policy first and saving domestic issues for a later time. When it comes to foreign policy, America strives for the following: to preserve the national security of the United States, to promote world peace, to maintain a balance of power amongst nations, and to spread democratic values as well as human rights (Hixson). Throughout history, the
The current international system is fragmenting rapidly since the end of the Cold War. A lot of regions in the world are still trying to find the balance of power in the international system, which the U.S. often intervenes to provide its brand of “global leadership”. Some countries like China are emerging as a global power since a few years ago. Subsequently, this will lead to a major threat to the U.S. status as a global major power. The rise of power by China in the international scene signifies the unpredictable nature of the international system. I would argue that the three most critical challenges for the U.S. arising out of this environment are the future world globalization that will cause a conflict between its domestic and foreign policy, the rise of China as a global power, and the ever globalization of terrorism. I believe that the U.S. should be pragmatic in handling its foreign policy and handle each situation independently without a fix doctrine in order to minimize the unintended consequences produced by the globalization of the world.