Public Health Over Individual Freedom Research Paper

Such as a ban ultimately puts the american values of freedom and individualism in jeopardy. Glass`s point is that if the government controls what we eat and drink then it is going to cause us very big trouble. However as the article of “food politics” states “poor health is much more than an individual's personal problems. If you are ill, your illness has consequences for others. This means

Public health is "the science and art of preventing disease, prolonging life and promoting health through the organized efforts and informed choices of society, organizations, public and private, communities and individuals" (1920, C.E.A. Winslow). This therefore infers public health is the preventing and controlling of disease within communities, to prolong life and promote health through organised society. The keys aspects of public health …

Undoubtedly, everyone craves a sense of freedom, but when given too much of it, freedom corrupts the mind. It corrupts the mind into thinking that whatever that person does, whether it involve them self or others, will go unchecked. For example, “He took a step, and able at last to hit someone, stuck his fist into

Public health is a main issue that a government is concerned about. It has established a variety of policies associated with public safety in order to promote the welfare of the entire population, protect people from being infected by diseases, and provide access to safety and health care for people. For several decades, all 50 states had required parents to immunize their children against various diseases as a requirement before entering public schools (Kitch E, et al), and the courts had already found that the mandatory vaccination statues for schoolkids are constitutional. As a result, the government has struggled finding a balance between protection of the public’s health and individual rights to mandatory vaccination laws since the policies became intrusive in our lives.

Assuming that the unattainable concept of what we call freedom can somehow be minimized to a level of human comprehension, than it is made self-apparent that the definition of the word is merely an ugly contradiction of itself. The Merriam-Webster dictionary definition for the word "freedom" reads as follows: "The power to act, say or think as one wants without hindering or restraint." This meaning of the word as we know it has been forever lost to the way that society has been constructed, for the selfish purposes of control. Even in the United States of America, the advertised success story and posterchild for freedom, we know only strict parameters under which we can exercise such choice.

I believe that the government has the responsibility to legislate good health throughout the communities that it overlooks. The extent of the laws they implement should depend on the health of their communities. For example, if a community has a high rate of motor vehicle deaths the government should enact a law that requires PRIMARY seatbelt usage as well as consequences for not following the law. On the other hand, if a community has a low rate of motor vehicle deaths the government has the right to enact a law that requires secondary seatbelt usage. Though the government has a responsibility to their community they should never be overbearing with their decisions because it erases the autonomy and individuality of the individuals within the community. It also causes the

The United States of America is known as a “free country,” which makes people think that they can do whatever they want. Freedom and Health are two principles that people desire in society. Society wants to balance both principles, but are impossible to meet. Although, society can’t please both sides, equally there are boundaries for both principles today. In addition, it is no doubt that health is more important than freedom which society should strive to achieve the greatest good for one. However, it is impossible for society to change one's freedom perspective towards the health of others unless it benefits one personally.

It is important to recognise that public health problems are complex and can be vast in magnitude. By nature health affects all populations, and therefore health leadership and management must consider chain reactions into economic and social problems, as well as direct health outcomes.

If I were to define freedom I would call it the ability to do what you want when you want, and have no outside forces preventing you from doing so. But that is a just a very broad definition and there are some exceptions. The first point that is brought up against freedom are laws. If my definition for freedom were to be taken verbatim then the fact that we have

In America today, Freedom is a big key to life.it s very hard to truly be free. Freedom is truly impossible to achieve cause everyone has different rights and beliefs. One cause of freedom being impossible to achieve is that people can use their rights and speak what they want and yes they are using their rights but other people might have different beliefs then them. One person might think something else when another person could think the complete opposite and they might be both right. Yes everyone has different rights but you can never have everyone have the same beliefs and be totally free.

When someone’s life decisions affect those around them, the state has permission to intervene in order to protect the public. Since the beginning of public health, medical professionals have struggled with the idea of people being able to make their own decisions, but also wanting to protect the public. We are all given freedom of choice, but what if our choices impact someone else’s health? There are ethics that come into question when posed with a medical threat. If someone poses a threat to public safety, it is ok for mandatory vaccinations, name reporting and quarantine in order to protect the public (Jennings, B., Kahn, J., Mastroianni, A., & Parker, L. S., 2003, p. 145).

When public health is concerned, ethical conflicts melded with political issues often arise, such as the matter related to the soda ban. On one hand, it can be said that one role of the government is to protect the health of its citizens and ensure their safety. For example, through agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which is responsible for protecting the public’s health by assuring the safety of drugs, biological products, medical devices, and our nation's food supply. If we consider, prevention as protecting the public, certainly the ban of soda by the government could be seen as ethical, as it would be for the common good of the entire community, preventing obesity, diabetes and poor dental health. The government’s

Three center worries every now and again emerge toward those developmental phases about public-health approach development: prevention, responsibility, and social Equity. How a frameworks approach should ethics What's more state funded wellbeing might improve the force of existing frameworks should manage these concerns, a purpose should make illustrated previously, our case investigations. The center mission of open wellbeing as a calling will be will Push the wellbeing of populaces Toward distinguishing danger figures for disease, disability, damage What's more passing Also Toward actualizing measures to decrease people’s presentation on these danger figures.14 the haul “prevention” captures those fundamental concern on interceding efficiently

In my opinion the most important issue in public health is infectious disease control, since public health had been established in the fourteenth century to present thousands of infectious diseases prevented, treatments provide and many people surviving, public health is protect the patient and Saving a life.

Although you can categorize freedom into being able to do what you want, meaning if you can choose to do anything that please them then anything can become freedom but it takes more than just being able to do what you want because when one person were to have freedom that way, it would be taken away from another person.