preview

Qumran Essene Hypothesis

Decent Essays

It is evident that the Qumran Essene Hypothesis fits most accurately as the Essenes being the primary writers of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Although, I also think that there were some secondary writers of the scrolls. This thought came to me from the third video (How were the Dead Sea Scrolls Written?) when it mentioned that the scrolls were often written by different scholars and were edited by each other. And connected to this thought is the how it possible “that the Essenes possessed monasteries…in the same wilderness of Judea” (flint 150). It would be assumed that these other monasteries were following the same guidelines and the Yahad and were writing the scrolls or part of them and having the scholars at Qumran be the final editors. To follow this Pilny talks about a tribe that is not a specific isolated group which can lead to other locations around the Qumran. Another reason why I think the Essenes are the primary writers is from the Rule of the Community and how it lines up with the Essenes. Todd Beall found 21 of them but the ones that I found to be most convincing is the joining of the community and marriage and Celibacy. As the Qurman community was isolated and sacred the process of joining the group needed to be strong filter system. The process was 2 years of following the rule of the community leading to full membership. Josephus has his interpretation of the Essene process leading to scholars …show more content…

For the Pharisees they were on the opposite side of the Essences. For example, in some sectarian scrolls refer to the Pharisees as “Wall-builders” but within the Essenes they conceal nothing between members. The Sadducees used priests but the Essenes thoughts this was a corruption of the church. In my opinion it makes the most sense that the Sadducees are not the writers possibly due to the low numbers of priests able to write the

Get Access