Race is a concept that was socially constructed to structure a hierarchical order that poses some races as superior to others. This concept is unable to explain human genome variation and evolution, thus nullifying the flawed concept with scientific evidence. Human variation occurs because of evolution, a biological process that all organisms involuntary undergo so that they can adapt to their environment to maximize their chances of survival. In contrast, race explains human variation as physical differences that determine power of one group over another. To truly understand why race is such an uneducated and outdated idea, one must study the semantics of the term, why it was socially constructed, the genetic evidence that proves that we are …show more content…
Race is an outdated idea that modern science invalidates. Y-chromosome data measured in Africa demonstrates that African peoples with a wide range of phenotypic variation (skin colors, hair forms, physiognomies) have a high percentage of males whose Y-chromosomes form closely related clades with each other instead of people that share the same physical features (Keita et al. 2). These individuals cannot be restricted by race grouping because they are more genetically similar to each other rather than the people that would be categorized with them based on physical features alone. Race is very ignorant; race only considers looks, but now with modern technology we can measure that people who look quite different are actually more related than those who may look similar. Human variation is a location-based process that evolution controls. There is no such thing as a race gene that controls an individual’s race at the moment of …show more content…
People believe that populations that evolved together constitutes a race. They think that “Blacks” are one race that stayed in Africa, “Asians” are another race that migrated to Asia, and “Whites” are another race because they moved to Europe. But these groups only represent the extreme physical differences in humans. And these groups only represent a small percentage of the world’s people, which is not useful. As human history progressed and humans moved out of Africa, they were always differentiating along the way. Race cannot explain the incredible diversity of mankind; it is not possible to organize this huge diversity of 7 billion people into so few categories. Shared traits are not random. For example, the dark skin of Somalian and Ghanaian people indicates that they evolved under heavy sun rays. But that’s all it shows; they are not more closely related (using genetic evidence) than any other group in the world. Sharon Begley argues that labeling Somalians and Ghanaians as “Blacks” does not show anything about their evolutionary history and even falsely assumes that they are more closely related than someone of another “race” (Begley 67). Humans are all Homo sapiens, the species to which all modern human beings belong. Humans slowly evolve based on their environment, not because a race gene determines their race. Other examples include “Similarly, the long noses of North Africans and northern Europeans reveal
Race is not an element of human biology (like breathing oxygen or reproducing sexually); nor is it even an idea (like the speed of light or the value of π) that can be plausibly imagined to live an external life of its own. Race is not an idea but an ideology. It came into existence at a discernable historical moment for rationality understandable historical reasons and is subject to change for similar reasons (101).
Scientists and other intellectuals recognize the modern concept of "race" as an artificial category that developed over the past five centuries due to encounters with non-European, even though scientists attempted to organize humans into categories according to their race, they have been demonstrated to be unscientific in this century.
What is race? Some people attach "race" to a biological meaning, yet others use "race" as a socially constructed concept. “Most biologists and anthropologists do not recognize race as a biologically valid classification, in part because there is more genetic variation within groups than between them” (. So, it is clear that even though race does not have a biological meaning, it does have a social meaning - usually detrimental to our social harmony. Race is neither an essence nor an illusion, but
Additionally, there is a substantial lack of real evidence that the divisions between groups that we often specify as “races” actually have specific genetic identities. The extreme presence of ambiguity central to races, and the plentiful variations within these races point towards evidence that even two randomly selected citizens of European descent could be more genetically related to a person of Asian descent than they are to each other.
Race is a hot topic in our world. We all think we know what race is. After all, we are constantly being bombarded with it whether it be from media, politics, or sports. The truth is that race does not revolve around the idea of biological traits or characteristics. It is a modern concept that we as a society have created to divide people into categories. I will argue that race is socially constructed from a biological, political history, and sociological standpoint, and how it may impact other areas of our society.
The idea of race in society is truly that; an idea. However, one of the first things one notices about another human is their perceived race. Often, incorrect assumptions are made about a person, based on his race. In addition, many believe race can be determined by biological factors. However, there is no biological basis to race. Without a doubt, genes play a role in our skin, hair, and eye color; however, there are not certain genes present in an entire race and not another. Race is not clear cut; if one were to travel from either pole to the equator, a specific location could not be identified to separate any two races.
The principles of genetics and evolution show that race, biologically does not exist. The differences that appear in humans does not come from an allele that marks for a specific race. Usually most of the variations we see in humans comes from mutations that occur. The change in DNA is a major factor of variation in humans, it is something random which means certain attributes aren’t associated with a specific race. Another important thing to note is that all humans share the basic structure of DNA. This reinforces the idea that race is a social construct, not a reality of nature. Another main source of variation comes from gene flow (the movement of alleles to and from a certain location). Populations have always been moving from one place to another, and through this a trait can become more unique or more common. So there is less to do about
The PBS series “Race: The Power of an Illusion” effectively works to expose race as a social construct and deconstructs the false notions that race is a biological marker. The series first discusses that all human beings originated from Africa but dispersed about 70,000 years ago to various places in the world. As a result of this migration, people were spread to different locations throughout the world with different environmental conditions that affected their physical traits. It was many years after the migration in which people began to display these new physical traits such as slanted eyes, fair skin, and differing hair textures. While the series notes the physical changes that occurred during the migration it also emphasizes that race while it may seem apparent in skin color and other physical features has no real biological basis.
Scholars say that the term race should not be used because it does not have any basis in scientific fact and really has no use today. According to the AAA’s statement on race, there is 94% variance in genes of individuals within one “racial” group. Race has its basis in colonization, when trying to conjure reasons why some groups of people, i.e. Native Americans and Africans, had lower places in society than the white people. That’s why the groups of “races” are so broad and meaningless today. The concept of race is just used to spread prejudice and give so called “scientific reasons” to discriminate against another group. The term
Before I studied human race in detailed, it was just one simple concept and classification that people hardly bothered about. The effects of race upon an individual are way too surprising. It affects one’s life chances, the area where one lives in, the way an individual is treated, one’s financial condition, education, life expectancy and so on.
Race is not all biologically real. According to Fuentes, race cannot be categorized as black, Asian or white because there are morphological and physiological variations (Fuentes 2012:74). Humans are all one race, whether they are different in skin color, body shape and size. Many religious beliefs support the idea of everyone being equal, regardless of the previous differentiations mention above, but science has devoted to the study of where humanity has originated and has expanded the idea of the word 'race'. Scientifically, humanity rose from the first ancient apes that best fit the characterizations of today's humans. Whether this is true or not, it is indeed very convincing that perhaps our first ancestors could have spread to different
The English term ‘race’ is believed to originate from the Spanish word raza, which means ‘breed’ or ‘stock’ (Race). People use race to define other groups, this separation of groups is based largely on physical features. Features like skin color and hair don’t affect the fundamental biology of human variation (Hotz). Race is truly only skin deep, there are no true biological separations between two ‘racial’ groups. Scientifically speaking, there is more variation between single local groups than there is between two large, global groups; the human variation is constantly altering (Lewontin). The majority of today’s anthropologists agree that race is a form of social categorization, not the separation of groups based on biological
Although race can be defined differently among members of the scientific community, there is a consensus that the traditional societal definition of race, wherein populations can be placed into definite categories like African or Asian, is not correct. The societal definition of race often takes into consideration sociocultural characteristics, such as language, culture, religion, and so on in addition to biological characteristics like morphology and skin color (Tishkoff & Kidd, 2004). This perspective of race as strict, unchanging classes has long since been discredited by most researchers for a large number of reasons. For instance, skin color and morphology are not typically considered adequate support for the existence of race because they often result from environmental pressures and are subject to convergent evolution (Tishkoff & Kidd, 2004). Sociocultural characteristics are not considered appropriate indicators either, as they can often encompass a wide variety of individuals with little genetic similarity.
The concept of race and the meanings associated with the term have continuously changed and evolved throughout history. Many negative connotations have been associated with the word race and these are evident as one reflects on the historical origins of the term. Commonly the term race is closely connected to the notion of ‘racism.’ Racism is a specific form of prejudice which focuses on physical variations between people. It describes the ideological belief that a person, or groups of people can be classified into ‘races’ which can be ranked in terms of superiority and inferiority (Spoonley, 1988:4). Giddens defines racism as “the attribution of characteristics of superiority or inferiority to a population sharing certain physically inherited characteristics” (1997:584). This supports the idea that racism is a manner of prejudice or animosity against people who have different physical characteristics. It is in virtue of circumstances such as these that Anthropologists find it necessary to make a distinction between the concepts of race and ethnicity.
If you would have asked me, "Do you believe race is biological or that is was socially constructed?", I would have responded with the same examples you may commonly receive from scientist or anthropologist; that race is in fact biological and deeply rooted and shared from generation to generation by DNA. However, through analyzing Pearson 's, Chapter 11 Race & Ethnicity we discover various examples in which history has built the shelves in which everyone is neatly categorized for its convenience even if not entirely in truth.