When watching an opera one can not help but feel the overly dramatized emotions performed by the cast members.Whether it be dramatic emotions involving pure joy or sadness the expression on the performers faces stay visually strong. In this instance the opera “Dido and Aeneas” by Henry Purcell transcribes that sense of it being both a story of love and happiness while having a dramatic ending. Although operas provide musical ratification it also brings up the idea of an opera taking away the sense of a textual dialogue among the performers/characters. According to “Rationalistic Distaste for Opera, “The French were skeptical of the whole idea of opera during its first century. They possessed a glorious and very intellectualized spoken drama, compared to which the Italian dramma per musica seemed a kind of child’s babble, in which verisimilitude was impaired, credibility made difficult, and the emphasis placed not on the content of the play but on decorative trappings”. As a result it brings up the idea of whether or not the actual dialogue or plot line served as great of an importance as the music might have especially to the audience viewing the opera. According to Pierre Corneille, “But I have been very careful to have nothing sung that is essential to the understanding of the play, since words that are sung are usually understood poorly by the audience, owing to the confusion caused by the multitude of voices which pronounce them at once. This response specially
After viewing the two operas, it is clear that there are many differences and similarities between the two performances. One of the biggest differences I noticed right away was the opera scenery that each of the shows had. L’Orfeo, written by Claudio Monteverdi had a much more theatrical vibe with elaborate scenery, props, and costumes used by the performers. The backdrop changed colors and had scenery images to help with representing the setting and time of day throughout the performance. Many props were used by all roles of the cast. The costumes were more elaborate and detailed compared to that of Dido and Aeneas, written by Henry Purcell. The costumes for L’Orfeo were geared to fitting into the Greek Mythology period since the opera
Orchestrally, it is scored for strings, timpani, bass drum, cymbals, two flutes, one piccolo, two oboes, one English horn, two clarinets, two bassoons, four French horns, two trumpets, three trombones, two harps, and one cimbasso. Musically, this opera is very directly vigorous. It sticks to the widely used concepts of arias, duets, finales, and choruses. His fine music often excused the glaring faults in character and plot lines.
Othello’s race and regression of speech (from calmness to rudeness), Iago’s victims (Othello, Desdemona, Cassio, Roderigo, etc.) being unravelled with manipulation and slyness, Desdemona’s struggling voice and false blame, etc., all participate in the damage the “power of language” causes. Therefore, by exploring the three language devices – “words as power”, “words as character” and “words as conversation” – it is possible to conclude that the language devices are used significantly in the play, “Othello”, because the human behaviour of the characters (Othello, Iago, Desdemona, etc.) is either positively or negatively influenced, and their characteristics and destinies are
30. What is a comic opera? Reaction against baroque style. Light in mood and modest in
After reading Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, it points out that using pathos is more effective than ethos and logos. The purpose of pathos is to evoke an emotional response from an audience in which makes them use action at times. In the play, characters like Antony and Cassius appeal to pathos to prompt the Roman citizens to take action which led to significant event that alter the plot of the play. This essay's purpose is to present multiple explanations on why pathos is the dominant mode of rhetoric in the play Julius Caesar.
“In the early days of the musical, what mattered most were the songs, and it was essential that they were catchy enough to amuse the audience or provide material for dancers or comedians. But, beginning in the 1930s, the situation, the book or libretto, of the musical started to achieve primary importance. A story or narrative became more frequently the spine of the musical; the songs followed the plot and the characters, rather than the other way around.”
Dido is the protagonist in Virgil’s The Aeneid. She is a powerful woman in the story as the Queen of Carthage. The relationship between Dido and Aeneas and their actions show what Virgil wants us to think about each character. Both possess many Roman virtues and values. How well each Dido and Aeneas live up to these values determine the outcome of their life, as Aeneas goes on to found Rome and Dido commits suicide due to Aeneas’ betrayal. The main point Virgil is trying to make in The Aeneid is that if you follow what is valued in Roman society that you will be rewarded in your life.
For decades humanity has fought an ongoing war between emotional and logical reasoning. Some tend to trust by nature, and convince themselves to make the impossible possible, no matter how bleak the situation may seem. However, there is a point when this optimism turns to lunaty. Others think more rationally, making cogent discussions over all desire. But are these “rational choices” more important than sentiments of the heart? Perhaps the best representation of these differentiating mind sets is in Virgil's The Aeneid “Book IV” and “ Book II”. Queen Dido's character represents heart over head, while Aeneas represents head over heart . I believe that virgil uses Queen Dido and Aeneas to represent how each of these attitudes can negatively or positively affect the outcome of a situation, and are ultimately equal.
Since the days of the ancient Greeks, music has been an integral part of drama and theatre. Many composers wrote music to accompany plays, and sometimes the music became more well-known than the play it was written for … It
The voice is considered as the most important element in the Italian Opera. On top of the polyphonic accompaniment for the orchestra, melody
The setting for Othello's final moments onstage is critical to how it is perceived by Othello, the other players onstage, and the audience. It lends credence to the nobility of the situation, and adds to Othello's misguided self-perception. The experience, in itself, is
Orfeo ed Euridice by Gluck, was written in 1762 and The Marriage of Figaro by Mozart was written in 1786. It is interesting to analyse the changes and developments from opera seria to these two examples.
Operatic dramas are usually serious, but there are several comic operas and funny scenes in tragic operas. The music is usually complicated and difficult to sing well. Only the most skillful
Othello is one of the greatest plays due to its variety of character and themes. The immorality seen in Iago, the gullibility in Othello, and the desperation of Desdemona make the story. The theme of social status plays a huge role in the story. In addition, the theme of appearance versus reality also plays a huge role in how each tragedy happens. In the critical essay “Othello” it discusses the idea that the characters are cast as outsiders due to false interpretation of what is happening or what is being said. On the other hand, the piece “Othello Character Analysis” emphasizes how characterization reflects the greatness of the piece.
In anticipation of attending the performance, I read up on the opera’s plot and watched videos of key moments. I became familiar with the characters and formed expectations of each. For instance, I expected Count Almaviva to be foolishly arrogant, with an I-expect-to-be-obeyed attitude. However, I was surprised and shocked to discover how very “human” each personage really was. A typical novel is told in the point of view of one individual with whom we, the audience, tend to sympathize with. We know their thoughts and feelings and we “cheer them on”, while despising the antagonists. In Guth’s The Marriage of Figaro, I found myself wishing for good closure for each and every one of the characters despite the fact that they are the source of each other’s misery.