Reading for pleasure seems to be a concept that as time goes on becomes not as well-known as before. Long term effects of not reading in our in our society could become a problem. Stephen L. Carter believes that the decline in reading is not a good thing for the United States. In the article “Reading for Pleaser Is in Painful Decline” by Stephen L. Carter, he shows significant evidence that the state of reading has declined in the United States. Carter shares his thought on the decline of reading in the United States by saying, “Being a nonreader is nothing to be proud of. A rise in proud nonreaders would bode ill for the nation’s future” (Carter 88). Carter believes that people should read for pleasure not just for academic purposes. He also believes that by not reading would be not for the nation’s future. By not reading he is afraid that the country or world will become a place …show more content…
Carter says because of the report he believes that we should read more for pleasure by saying, “that active and engaged reader lead richer intellectual lives than nonreader and that a well-read citizenry is essential to a vibrant democracy” (Carter 22). Carter also says that reading books that challenge us it good for us because it makes us use our intellectual sides more. While some people will say that there is not enough evidence to say that reading has or will have a negative effect on our society, it is important that young readers find reading enjoyable and not a chore. Others may say that Carter is too biased to say that a decline in readers is a problem while other may agree because of the evidence that the reports say. Even though there is only one report that he references is clearly say that not reading for pleasure could and will most likely cause problems for our society in the
In today’s society reading is essential to function. Everywhere people turn they are required to read directions, labels, books, what’s going on in the news, or mandatory rules they need to follow. Just think about if a majority of the world couldn’t read how chaotic society would be.
In the passage “Why Literature Matters” by Dana Gioia, Gioia states that the decline of interest in reading in America is decreasing. She then claims that this lack of interest will hold negative effects on the future of our society. Gioia uses facts and evidence to support her claim.
In Dana Gioia’s article titled “Why Literature Matters”, he explains about the decline of reading literature for young Americans. Although “income rose to unforeseen levels, college attendance ballooned, and access of information increased enormously” he states, “the interest young Americans showed in the arts… diminished”. In his article, Gioia uses surveys, articles, studies, and statistics to persuade his audience that the decline of reading in America can have a negative effect on society.
Dana Giona persuades his audience on how the decline of reading in America will impact society negatively by incorporating a precise set of diction usage and including irony in his article.
Dana Gioia calls out millennials and younger generations in america, to spark a conversation about the increasingly declining and destructive behavior of NOT reading! Gioia makes very many fantastic points and uses very many persuasive elements on why literacy actually is vital to to our society and the negative effects that come from this lack of literacy. She gives us factual evidence and credible sources to pull the reader into her side of the argument.
Dana Gioia builds an argument to persuade american citizens that the decline in reading in america will have a negative effect on society. The decline of reading in the point of view of dana will decline americans knowledge
Dana Gioia, author of the article "why Literature Matters", writes about the decline of reading in the U.S. and how it affects our society. The consequences of people not reading are expressed through his specific factual evidence and his prediction of what is going to happen if the American people continue to ignore this issue.
Taking into account of many Americans, the act of reading is not apart of our daily lives as it was many years ago. Instead, the media has taken over and leaves us at a disadvantage of developing our minds. The level of proficiency, “Fell significantly between 1992 and 2005, from 40 percent… to 35 percent (Chronicle).” In spite of that, reading gives us the opportunity to get different perspectives, learn valuable lessons, and engage emotions that might not be sparked otherwise. The list can go on and on, however, even with all of these great benefits, the literacy rate in America is continuing to drop.
In response to the American declining reading trend, New York Times author Dana Gioia writes an editorial piece on the subject. In her piece she uses various national studies and surveys, the workplace and the civic duty to make her point of the negative effects of diminished reading habits.
The decline of reading by Americans isn´t by all Americans, Dana Gioia states that the “ declines have been most severe among younger adults ages 18-24.” (pg 1) Dana uses this fact from the 2002 survey to support her conclusion that the decline of reading will have a negative effect on society because it “ signifies deep transformations into a contemporary life.” (pg 1)
Technological advances have shaped this era into what it is today. From news articles to Facebook posts, we are always reading throughout the day. In the article, “Nation Shudders at Large Block of Uninterrupted Text” by The Onion in the book Everyone’s an Author, raises questions how reading habits have changed over the past couple generations. One has to wonder what text we take the time to read and what text we do not take the time to read. Everyday advertisements, articles, and many other texts pry for our attention. In this day and age, people want information right away. This article shows how reading habits by Americans have shifted over the past few decades and generations.
Declines in reading is growing larger and larger as time goes on. The author showed this by using a survey that was taken in 2002. It stated “declines have been most severe among younger adults… ages 18-24”. If the younger adults arent intrested in reading, then they won’t push that love onto their children one day. This then starts a trend of literature rates droping fast.
As printed text becomes more difficult to read, reading as a hobby has gotten a lot less attractive to some people. UCLA psychology professor Patricia Greenfield points out in her studies, “reading develops imagination, induction,
Researchers have consistently found that pleasure reading increases throughout childhood and begins to decline, usually at age twelve to thirteen. Few researchers have explored the specific reasons for this decline from the perspective of teens themselves, and fewer still have explored the role that reading for pleasure plays in the lives of young teens. Our understanding of teen pleasure reading sums greater importance as public libraries focus simultaneously on improving services to teen patrons and to pleasure readers of all ages as key to strategies to
Researchers have consistently found that pleasure reading increases throughout childhood and begins to decline, usually at age twelve to thirteen. Few researchers have explored the specific reasons for this decline from the perspective of teens themselves, and fewer still have explored the role that reading for pleasure plays in the lives of young teens. Our understanding of teen pleasure reading sums greater importance as public libraries focus simultaneously on improving services to teen patrons and to pleasure readers of all ages as key to strategies to