preview

Reagan Revolution Research Paper

Decent Essays

There was much controversy during the Reagan Revolution about whether or not what President Reagan was doing for the country would turn out as beneficial to the country in the long run. Reagan had quickly reflected the reinvigoration of conservatism with tax cuts, a laissez faire approach to business, and strong national defense. The results of Reagan’s policies would have a huge impact on American politics after his terms and there were different opinions on his actions. Some people thought that Reagan’s “Revolution” may have changed the country for the worse and made the job harder for future presidents. Others believe that Reagan did not create the revolution, he simply “gave form and direction” to it. I agree with Jenkins’ position because …show more content…

The difference between Dallek and Jenkins’s views was that while Jenkins believed that Reagan was not starting a revolution and only gave form and direction to it, Dallek thought that Reagan started the revolution and the long term effects of the presidency were not good. Dallek said “some of Bush’s biggest failures are traceable to Reagan’s controversial approach to tax cuts, business regulation, national security, and social issues.” This, however, is hard to prove true because Bush’s presidency was driven by foreign policy and he raised taxes from where Reagan had lowered them to. The Berlin Wall fell early in Bush’s presidency as well as the Soviet Union and also Bush militarily occupied Panama during his tenure. Bush negotiated weapon limitation treaties with Russia and intervened in the Gulf war when Iraq refused to pull its forces out of Kuwait. Bush was more focused on foreign politics rather than domestic policy. Although the aftershock of the crisis of 1987 may have affected Bush’s chance to win the election of 1992, Bush did not seem to make a large attempt to revive the economy during his presidency. The crisis of 1987 happened in Reagan’s presidency so it could be said that the crisis caused Bush to fail but Bush did not act to bring the economy back …show more content…

The difference that I found between the two views was that Jenkins thought Reagan was not leading a revolution but giving form and direction to it while Dallek believed Reagan started a revolution and caused failure in Bush’s Presidency. The previous development of the New Right movement shows that Reagan was merely guiding an already established revolution however the Crisis of 1987 led to recession through the early 1990s which could have led to dislike of Bush’s

Get Access