Reason v. Emotion: is the Western philosophical heritage dominated as it is by Reason too one-dimensional?
The connection between reason and emotion is a topic that has long been observed by philosophers. Historically, Reason was assumed by the ancients and by medieval philosophers to be superior to Emotion. Emotion was what made humans human. Philosopher David Hume famously asserted, “Reason is a slave to the passions.”
Plato saw Reason and Emotion as two horses pulling a chariot in different directions, while the charioteer struggles to get them to work as a team. He proposed that the human soul comprises of three parts: Reason, the Appetites and the Will. Only when the Appetites and the Will are working under the control of Reason can the soul be fully human.
Most western philosophers such as Aristotle and Plato thought that reason is inherently superior to emotions. Aristotle argued that human happiness depends on the exercise of reason. This idea of the superiority of reason influenced philosophers for centuries. Reason was what distinguished humans from the animals and the emotions simply got in the way of its proper exercise.
…show more content…
Rene Descartes argued the superiority of reason over emotion and preached a form of philosophical rationalism. However there were a few philosophers who challenged this distinction between reason and emotion. David Hume said that humans project subjective feeling onto an act or situation and call it good or bad if it makes us feel good or bad respectively. Our moral compass dictates how we feel about actions in these situations. This means that human nature influences our emotions and reason. The question that comes to mind is, is the nature of humans essentially good or
This paper will examine Robert C. Solomon's Emotions and Choices article, to best identify what anger is, and to what extent a rational human being is responsible for their anger. Firstly, Solomon's argument must be described. A quick summation of Solomon's argument can be found in the following four points: Emotions are judgements, emotions are chosen, emotions serve a purpose, and emotions are rational.1 To quote Solomon, he explains that “Emotions are not occurrences, and do not happen to us. They ... may be chosen like an action.”2
Reason and emotion how does it affect our critical thinking? When you are dealing with conflict or debate, it is important to use reason and emotion. If you feel strongly about a subject or conflict you will work harder to prove or disprove the subject. The problem is if you only use emotion your thoughts can get cloudy, emotions can take over. If
According to Socrates one of the most important things that identify with human being is their desire. Socrates argues that desire that can change people minds quickly and very abnormally. The three-part division of the soul is crucial to Plato’s overall project of offering the same sort of explication of justice whether applied to societies or individuals.
Jennifer S. Lerner, author of Emotion and Decision Making, talks about how our emotions can actively affect our actions. In Lerner’s book, it states, “We start with emotions arising from the judgement or a choice at hand, a type of emotion that strongly and routinely shapes decision making.” Our emotions cause us to make certain decisions in our everyday lives. For example a person who is feeling nervous and anxious about a specific outcome of a risky situation may choose a more safe route. A person who admires an organization may donate money. In both cases, our the way we feel about something or someone determines how we address a situation and how we treat someone or something. In some way our emotions act as our conscience in each situation we go through that requires us to choose an outcome .
Reason also known as (logic or logos) refers to any attempt to appeal an argument using only valid facts. Some individual’s actions are based on reasons, as they are managed by rationality and they think very cautiously about all the decision they make. Conversely, passion also known as (emotion or pathos) refers to being able to persuade a situation
Attempts to define “emotion” have proved to be rather difficult. Instead of searching for a comprehensive definition, Gross (2011) describes the three core features of emotions. First, emotions occur when an individual decides that a situation is relevant to his or her goals. Second, emotions are multi-faceted, and involve both subjective and physiological experiences, as well as behaviors. The third feature involves the authoritative nature of emotions. They have the powerful ability to interrupt ongoing processes, assert their priority over other activities, and force their way into awareness. For example, some traditions describe emotions as “disorganized interruptions of mental activity” (Salovey & Mayer, 1989). Emotions are such an
My job as a volunteer, is at times to call certain groceries to delivering the food to the warehouse. Through more emotional seasons such as Thanksgiving and Christmas (sometimes families in desperate need come to the actual warehouse), the appeal of emotions work better than the idea of reason. The reason for this is the natural nature of human beings. Humans naturally are not sadistic creatures instead the trait of empathy is imperative to our decisions regarding morals. Our empathy for others and emotional understanding allows us to produce more knowledge through shared knowledge as it gives a path to understanding of others. However, in opposition to this view reason can not be counted out in term of being left to operating purely on emotion. Without reason I would decide to give every family that showed an entire ration to last them for years, but this would lead to consequences that are not wanted. As a result we should not rely on pure individual emotions as the foundation of our moral decisions but also have a more consistent system to make our decisions based off of which is reason. With this being said emotions often times contradict our reasoned arguments but both are codependent of each other in the justification of
Plato continues to relate the categories of a just state to the individual soul. He says that the soul has different parts to it as well and for them to be in harmony is for
Emotions are used in everyday life, whether it be just a simple smile that makes happiness disperse in your brain, or a death of a loved one that causes sadness. The basic emotions are joy, interest, surprise, sadness, anger, disgust, contempt, fear, shame, and guilt. The way we see emotion in ourselves and others can be very complex because we sometimes assume they feel a certain way just based on their actions or even facial expressions. When emotion is discussed in psychological terms, it is not based on one thing, instead it’s a mix of bodily arousal, expressive behaviors, conscious experience. Many theories try to explain how emotion works.
In particular, the idea of feelings over reason could be seen in “The Devil and Tom Walker”. On page 157, Tom tells his wife about the hidden treasure and she had the urge to have
reasoning and our emotions are means to understand the world around us, but neither one
The complexity of human emotions has been an unsolvable conundrum that has plagued the minds of philosophers for hundreds of years. In fact, to this day, philosophers still feverishly debate the various components of emotions. Whether it is the origins of emotions or the effect on the human body that emotions have, actual facts and proven theories about emotions are impossible to one hundred percent be verified. One emotion that is particularly complex and powerful is the emotion of fear. For example, there are times when an individual is totally paralyzed and unable to move purely because of the fact that the individual
He found that there was no order in everyday life; history was composed of the downfalls of man, follies that were repeated generation after generation. He believed that the only way to purge one’s body from the cycle of unending meaninglessness was to live by logic. Logic allowed the body to exist in harmony with the soul by casting aside anything without meaning. The unity of body and soul represented ultimate control. Plato stated, “When the soul and body are united, then nature orders the soul to rule and govern, and the body to obey and serve” (513). When the soul was in complete control, the bodily weaknesses disappeared and the mind was left to think freely. Eventually, through thought, one could achieve bodily transcendence and purpose within life.
For many people, they live their lives based on emotions. Emotions of happiness, love, success, and many more, could possibly be the most satisfying feelings. Except we commonly experience unpleasant emotions. There are emotions of anger, hatred, sadness, and disgrace. A very important question in the understanding of the human mind and highly related to cognitive science, is how do these emotions affect human cognition and the impact on our abilities to be rational? To tackle this question, we need to understand what emotions are, but not solely in the manner we are all familiar with, we need to understand them from a cognitive nature involving our physiology, psychology, and environment. Cognition, according to the Oxford definition
As Plato advocates that soul belongs to different order from body, so it cannot be set alongside the body as homogeneous entity. The soul’s penchant is towards another world. It becomes evident, why the senses are envisaged, not as windows but as bars, since so far as the physical nature of man is concerned it is not just a matter of noting, ontologically, the finite character of its existence, but rather one making an ethical and religious value-judgment on this earthly life form the viewpoint of higher destiny. Only when the soul has undergone an inner transformation and been duly prepared for this it can looks at the body in a fresh light, as it were, and so discover as meaningful affinity between soul and body, which serves to orientate man towards the higher reality.