preview

Reason Vs. Emotion

Good Essays

Reason v. Emotion: is the Western philosophical heritage dominated as it is by Reason too one-dimensional?

The connection between reason and emotion is a topic that has long been observed by philosophers. Historically, Reason was assumed by the ancients and by medieval philosophers to be superior to Emotion. Emotion was what made humans human. Philosopher David Hume famously asserted, “Reason is a slave to the passions.”

Plato saw Reason and Emotion as two horses pulling a chariot in different directions, while the charioteer struggles to get them to work as a team. He proposed that the human soul comprises of three parts: Reason, the Appetites and the Will. Only when the Appetites and the Will are working under the control of Reason can the soul be fully human.
Most western philosophers such as Aristotle and Plato thought that reason is inherently superior to emotions. Aristotle argued that human happiness depends on the exercise of reason. This idea of the superiority of reason influenced philosophers for centuries. Reason was what distinguished humans from the animals and the emotions simply got in the way of its proper exercise. …show more content…

Rene Descartes argued the superiority of reason over emotion and preached a form of philosophical rationalism. However there were a few philosophers who challenged this distinction between reason and emotion. David Hume said that humans project subjective feeling onto an act or situation and call it good or bad if it makes us feel good or bad respectively. Our moral compass dictates how we feel about actions in these situations. This means that human nature influences our emotions and reason. The question that comes to mind is, is the nature of humans essentially good or

Get Access