Rehabilitation Act Of Rehabilitation

20. The following are trends in substance abuse treatment today except for A. chain smoking regarded as an addiction B.human rights seen as a practical philosophy C.counseling of clients in moderate drinking D.public opinion favoring more imprisonment of drug users ANS:D PG42 21. The drug court movement promotes what action with individuals whose legal problems are related to their addiction? A. decarceration – treatment in the community B. incarceration – treatment in the prison system C. requirement to serve out the remainder of prison term, in case of relapse D. moving clients into “wet house”. ANS:A PG46

Many different states have begun sending nonviolent drug offenders to various kinds of drug treatment program the state offers. By doing this, it has significantly reduced the problems with overcrowding. If an individual is arrested and charged with simple possession of a drug and no other crime is being commented, then this person is doing no harm to anyone else. They should be given the opportunity to try and make a change in their life and beat the addiction. Instead, if this person is thrown into jail, they are still going to be an addict with a criminal record now and will not be able to be a contributing member of society. (Everett 1 ).

The cost of substance abuse in Canada is astronomical. According to the Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse (CCSA), in 2002 alcohol accounted for about $14.6 billion and illegal drugs for about $8.2 billion in social cost (Single, Robertson, Rehm, & Xie, 2002). This cost was measured in terms of the burden on health care and law enforcement, and productivity in the workplace or home. Arguably, the greatest cost may be immeasurable: human suffering and tragic loss of lives. This suffering is not limited to only of those wrestling with these problems, but extends those around them: family, friends, co-workers and society as a whole.

On September 26, 1973, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 was put into place to replace the Vocational Rehabilitation Act. The population that benefitted the most from this act were the people who lived with disabilities. The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 developed, revised and implemented many plans for the disabled population. A few of the plans that were carried out with this act were the assistance of constructing and improve rehabilitation facilities, gauging the rehabilitation potential of individuals with a disability, promoting and expanding employment opportunities for individual with disabilities and more (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, n.d.). In 2001, a bill was introduced to the Senate by Senator Thurmond Strom (R-SC) that proposed to exclude prisoners from receiving the benefits of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (S.33—107th Congress, 2001).

Drug abuse has always been a delicate subject as it deals with the health, safety, and the well-being of not only the users, but also everyone they come into contact with. Cities across Canada are faced with a rising number of drug abusers, and therefore increased cases of infectious diseases and overdoses by these users. Vancouver housed the first injection site in Canada; its purpose to offer sterile syringes as well as other equipment to addicts, medical care in the event of an overdose or other emergency, as well as counseling and referrals to drug rehabilitation programs. This was a great step towards ensuring the safety and security of the public; drug users are given access to safe, one-use syringes and are provided with clean environment,

There are many ways in which people who are addicted to intravenous drugs are perceived by our society. People sometimes believe the addicted person is to blame for their circumstance and substance dependence and some feel serious drug addicts are a “lost cause” due to a lack of values or flawed character. “Persons who struggle with addictions often are depicted as criminals or prostitutes, weak, lazy and morally corrupt” (Bartlett, R., Brown, L., Shattell, M., Wright, T., Lewallen, L. (2013). These stereotypes paint people with addiction negatively; a percentage of people who live with serious addiction are capable of recovery with the right attitude, support and healthcare. Street level healthcare services such as; safe injection sites, provide accessable resources at street level for people to make the choice to live healthier lifestyles. Govement funding and support is needed to make these projects possible to improve the health of Canadians. Safe injection sites are proven to be positive contributions to communities, save lives, reduce harm and open doors towards recovery for people from the grip of addiction.

In most cases, one of the main objectives of courts and the sentences they impose is that of rehabilitation. This is evidenced through a growing move in favour of a more holistic approach to justice, trying to address the issues which may have led to the crime, rather than just punishing the end result. One of the prime examples of this therapeutic approach to justice is the introduction of the Drug Court. Governed by the Drug Court Act 1998, the Drug court has both Local court and District court jurisdiction, and seeks to target the causes of drug-related criminal behaviour. It achieves this by ensuring that those who go through it receive treatment for their addictions, thereby reducing their propensity to reoffend, as many crimes are motivated by the need to satisfy addictions.

Using injection sites that not only provide the individual with the instruments but also the knowledge of same practices would be very beneficial investment for Canada, thus the previously stated example of how Canada has already enabled and succeeded with this method within Vancouver British Columbia. If Canada were to take on more of these harm reduction initiatives then there could be more individuals benefiting from the process and as a result street crime with drugs would also be dramatically decreased. However in reality Canada has already been practicing harm reduction strategies for centuries, they have just been practiced without the label of harm reduction. “In 1987, as concerns rose in the community about the spread of HIV through injection drug use, bleach programs were started at Alexandra Park in Toronto; these developed into syringe exchange programs in 1988 and were taken over by the City of Toronto in 1989” (Cavalieri, W. & Riley, D. 2012, Harm Reduction in Canada: The Many Faces of Regression. 3). With every initiative designed to help society there will always be those who disagree with the approach. Even though there is overwhelming evidence that harm reduction techniques such as injection sites work, funding is a big issue mainly on account of these methods advertise and

The ADA story started quite a while back in urban communities and towns all through the United States when individuals with disabilities started to challenge societal boundaries that prohibited them from their groups, and when parents of children with disabilities started to battle against the rejection and isolation of their kids. It started with the foundation of neighborhood gatherings to advocate for the privileges or rights of individuals with disabilities.

This is a federal law that was established to protect the rights of individuals with disabilities in programs and activities that receive Federal funding from the United States Department of Education. This section explains the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 by referencing that an individual with a disability cannot and should not be excluded from participating in the activities of his/her interests that are funded by the Federal government. If an organization receiving federal funding does deny an individual with a disability(ies), he/she may file a complaint against the organization stating that the organization is discriminating according to Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. A school district can be reported as operating out

This is a very interesting in an article in regards to mental illness. James did everything correctly by notifying his supervisor about being stressed out, overwhelmed and need some assistance with mental impairment. Unfortunately, the supervisor failed to offer to counsel or redirect him to Human Resources for further assistance. In fact, the employee did the right thing by filing a lawsuit under ADA and Rehabilitation Act of 1973 means that, as long as the applicant or employee is otherwise qualified for the position, with or without reasonable accommodation, the employer is prohibited from making any adverse employment decision solely on a basis of the disability.

Major curricular implications of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 are that schools who receive federal funding must be aware of educational options for students who have disabilities that fall under Section 504 definition. Schools are required to annually identify all students with disabilities and provide regular or special education that meets the needs of those students. Schools must also be careful to make sure students with disabilities are educated with nondisabled students as often as possible. Schools have various curricular options in regards to Section 504 when it comes to modifications and accommodations. Most of the accommodations can be made within the regular classroom. For example, accommodations may involve a seating arrangement. I currently have a Section 504 student who is hearing impaired. When I restructure my seating arrangement, I have to place her towards the front of the classroom with her back to the wall in order for her to be able to see me as I teach. Her Section 504 accommodation requires that she not have students behind her because it causes her great discomfort and she is unable to focus. When creating the seating chart, I place her first and then arrange other students accordingly. Students under a Section 504 may also be accommodated with e-readers, testing modifications and leniency in attendance policies. Schools must also allow students an equal

The United States Correctional System is often challenged as to whether it wants to rehabilitate drug offenders or punish them, and because of this it mostly does neither. Even though drug abuse and drug trafficking are widely spread national issues, the mental, social, and economic costs of "healing" through incarceration are only making the "disease" worse. Never before have more prisoners been locked up on drug offenses than today. Mixed with the extremely high risks of today's prison environment, the concept of incarceration as punishment for drug offenders cannot be successful. Without the correct form of rehabilitation through treatment within Michigan's Correctional System, drug

Scientific research shows that treatment can help many drug using offenders change their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors; avoid relapse; and successfully remove themselves from a life of substance use and crime. Treatment can cut drug use in half, decrease criminal activity, and reduce arrests. It is true that legal pressure might be needed to get a person into treatment and help them stay there. Once in a treatment program, however, even those who are not initially motivated to change can become engaged in a continuing treatment process. In fact, research suggests that mandated treatment can be just as effective as voluntary admission to rehab centers.

Throughout the years, many processes have been created to form the rehabilitation process of criminal justice. This process has reached out to many offenders and their families by allowing them to return to the community as changed individuals. Rehabilitation has many different process, but most, if not all have been proven successful in returning offenders to the community as changed individuals.