Many investors when making a decision regarding investing in a other country take into account certain factors which may play a very important role or may affect their future returns. Standard economics theory suggests that over the long run, profits or returns should rise in line with the economy/ economic growth, which is also the view point of many investors when making a decision.
Although the long run research and studies conducted by different economists gives a very different picture of the relationship between stock returns and economic growth, but very little empirical evidences to support the view with. Many economists and researchers supported the view that, stock returns and economic growth does not have a positive
…show more content…
Jay.R Ritter in his research said that the main reason for a negative correlation between the two factors, according to him during high growth rate periods markets usually assign a high price/Earning and price to dividend multiples and which then lowers the realized returns because now more capital is required from the investors to in order to receive the same level of earning s and dividends from stocks.
From all these studies and empirical evidence it can be concluded that stock returns and economic growth are not related but have a negative correlation.
Ho= no correlation between economic growth and stock return.
H1= there is a relation between economic growth and stock returns
On the other hand the results for interest rates give the same type of results. The basic classical economics model suggests that there is a relationship between interest rates and economic growth. Usually reduction in the interest rates cause the level of growth to increase, this is because a reduction in interest rates makes borrowing more cheaper and encourages in investment in the economy, which eventually increases the growth rate. However, an increase in interest rates has an opposite effect on economic growth. According to (Suntum, 2008) high interest rated discourage investment as it’s more tempting to rather save the money and earn a decent interest rate, thus making the aggregate demand to fall which then badly affects the economic growth of
These changes in prices imply the power of growth rate’s assumption over stock price because “It was growth that drew attention to the brand. It was growth that propelled the stock offering. It was growth that drove the stock price to ever greater heights.” When the growth rate is expected to increase significantly, value of the firm is increased tremendously and so is its stock price. Both the enterprise value of the firm and its stock price change in the same direction with the change in growth rate estimates.
Higher interest rates are never a good idea for a growing economy because it can directly impact it. Higher interest rates can affect
Another desirable effect of economic growth is increased tax revenue, the government receives more money from tax payers with out having to increase tax rates. If people are earning more, the more money they will pay in tax, the more money companies make the more tax they must pay to the government. The more money the government gains in tax revenue the more they can do to improve the country, they can invest in transport and infrastructure, they can make improvements to health care and they may even need to employ more people further reducing unemployment.
In Chapter 12 of the General Theory of Employment, John Maynard Keynes focused on examining the stock market and how it functions, in the sense of its structure and how it is affected by the behavior of investors because he believed the behavior of the stock market affects the aggregate demand, hence the rest of the economic system. He is most interested in the fluctuations of the rates of investments in the stock market that consequently affect
The US economy is made up of approximately 2/3 (68.7% to be exact) by consumer spending. Therefore, any significant change in GDP usually has a substantial effect on the stock market. When an economy is healthy and expanding, it is anticipated that businesses will report better earnings and growth. This will create a positive effect for the US stock markets in a bullish manner. At the same time, lower GDP measurements can have the opposite effect on stock prices as businesses begin to suffer. This lower GDP will have a negative effect on the US stock market in a bearish manner.
considered to be linked to stock prices. Dilon and Owers (1997) argues that, if the
The stock market heavily influences the strength of an economy. The new president’s plans for the American economy have prompted investors to start buying and investing again. According to USA Today, the “Trump Rally” was what put the Dow Jones average back on track.
When a nation experiences a long-term economic growth, people have a positive attitude. There are opportunities for new jobs, new technology, and open doors for more capital for investment. The result of growth increases demand, supply, aiding the production of goods and services boosting consumers’ confidence. Economists believe the right type of growth that is stable and controllable is the best.
investors are rational and risk averse, meaning they will always value securities with higher returns than securities with lower returns.
Economic growth positively produces more jobs and a strong level of economic growth can help individuals who are willing to find employment. Countries
There are many pros when it comes to economic growth. Economic growth has the capability to improve the standard of living. Economic growth is caused by an increase of goods and services being produced and sold. Another benefit of economic growth is a decrease in the employment rate. As companies invest more, it will lead to more jobs being available which will dramatically help the unemployment
To start off I will begin by explaining how economic growth occurs. Economic growth occurs when there is an increase in output over time as well as the growth in the working population allows an economy to increase its output by having fewer people out of work and making an economy of full employment. For an economy to achieve this long-run growth it must have invested more in capital goods. This creates a better chance to produce more consumer goods in the long run. When doing this, living standards going down in the short run but
Investing in emerging markets offer tempting advantages to investors. The volatile economies of countries considered to be in this category have a potential for extraordinary returns. A caveat to investors considering opportunities in emerging markets are the presence of unstable governments, the chance of nationalization, poor property rights protection, and large swings in prices. Emerging markets are far from a sure thing. But, despite high individual risk, emerging markets can reduce portfolio risk. The volatile economies of these countries have such low correlations compared to the domestic market that they actually provide the greatest degree of diversification.
Looking back over the past ten years and most especially the past three years for investment returns and economic possibilities, there seems to be more growth in the past 24 months than what we have seen in over a decade. The rapidly changing international economic climate and the current government struggles with tax based polices and the continued climbing US
First time this phenomenon was presented by the economists Rajnish Mehra and Edward Prescott in 1985. They discovered that the return from US equity investments in comparison to the return from a risk free government securities had been much far above during the twentieth century to be interpreted by the traditional economic theories (Siegel and Thaler, 1997).