Relationship Between Prejudice And Religiosity

This article by Brittany H. Bramlett analyzes the relationship with religion and contact with homosexuals in the United States. The article takes a look on how relationships with gays and lesbians may influence people of different faiths and religious traditions differently or not at all (The Cross-Pressures of Religion and Contact with Gays 1). The results from the article showed that people of

Presently, this post does not serve to slander the social benefit of treating everyone of each race, statement of faith, faith, and sexuality similarly under the law. That esteem is something which we should keep on yearning for. I comprehend the peril in tossing this thought out.

The psychological perspectives concerning prejudice is assuming someone or something is a certain way before actually knowing and having facts. The sociology book gives a few examples of theories on prejudice. It is often to hear an assumption rather than the facts when something or someone is referenced. I believe people judge to quickly. Anymore we are so focused on first impressions we tend to forget who we are. Also, it is typical to try something out once and if you were not pleased we often not give it a second chance.

Today, religious tolerance is considered a social norm. However, it hasn’t always been this way, and some groups were certainly more persecuted than others. In the early 1960s people of America connected with their religious roots, exercising a freedom that was under threat by the Soviet Union during the Cold War. Two decades later in the mid-eighties, certain groups, conservative followers of Reagan and the moral majority in particular, rushed forth the ideas of a wholesome modest family, contrasting from the changing social climate. More recently in the 2000’s people have begun to relinquish and get away from their religious roots, which some could attribute to the increasingly immoral behavior. It seems the pattern history takes with religion

Knoll (2009) described minority religious groups as religions with U.S. membership not surpassing 5%. Mormons and Jews, both minority religions, were found to have positive attitudes toward immigration. These findings showed support for marginalization theory, which hypothesizes that members of minority groups have faced “political and social discrimination” and therefore “feel a sense of shared experience with other marginalized groups,” (Knoll 2009). This supports the idea that members of the Mormon and Jewish religions share characteristics with immigrants making them more likely to feel empathy for their marginalized status in the U.S., resulting in more positive attitudes. Additionally, those who identified as nonreligious were more tolerant than Protestants, the most common religion in the United States (Brenneman

Dr. Adair brought up a fascinating point that most workplaces would tell you that religion and politics don’t belong in the work force. This is something even my employer emphasizes to all employees. In everything, I do in my life I center it on my religion. Catholicism makes up my beliefs in how others should be treated, ethics, and helping or looking out for others who may be less fortunate. In ten, twenty, or thirty years from now this would always be an aspect I would chose, because it is the very core of how I chose to live my life. There are also biases when people hear I am a Catholic. It’s not uncommon especially in the GLAD community that Catholics believe being gay/lesbian is a sin against God. Therefore, because I am Catholic I “hate” all gay/lesbian individuals. This is actually something far from the truth. Being gay or lesbian has nothing to do with the core traits I feel might make up a person. If someone is an honest, trustworthy, and hardworking individual that promotes inclusion (like many of my coworkers); why would their sexual preference, have any significance? I find these recognizable conversations ones I do have to address; however, can be tricky when in an environment where religion shouldn’t be

There are several steps that can be taken to eliminate prejudice and oppression in our society, such as we must first stop trying to compete against other cultures. Therefore, oppression is always tied into gender discriminations, race, class, and sexual orientation. However, we need to stop stereotyping people. Next, we should be more knowledge about other cultures? history, and remember each cultural is different. Most all we must remember we only learned from what we hear and see others do. So, we must teach our children that even though another cultural is different, they are still just like you and me.

Prejudice is saying you don’t like something without even trying it, like if someone were to say “ that’s not a good book because the cover doesn’t have any color.” Prejudice can be a good thing or a bad thing. For example, people can propose hurtful stereotypes about other people. However a positive prejudice is “killing with kindness”, saying something really positive about a group of people, like “all women are organized” or “all dads can fix a car.”

Some say prejudice is a component of human nature. Others believe we pick it up from our elders. Either proposal could be true, as there are various controversial beliefs about the nature of prejudice. One interesting theory is that prejudice is an emotional reaction, activated whenever we encounter unknown people, who possess unusual physical characteristics, uncommon personalities, and unfamiliar beliefs. In fact, these people frighten us, and we treat them differently to reassure ourselves that they cannot possibly matter to us. To better

In order to determine the psychological factors motivating specific presentations of prejudice in modern society, Forscher and his associates at the University of Wisconsin-Madison examined the manifestation of bias at both the covert and overt level. Throughout the article, aptly entitled “The Motivation to Express Prejudice” Forscher’s team deconstruct the amalgamation of various factors both internal and external that create and inhibit prejudice, and determine how those factors influence the subtle (and not so subtle) biased behaviors of various persons towards minority demographics like homosexuals and African-Americans. The article aimed to distinguish between deliberate, outward prejudice and subconscious, inward prejudice using The

Most people have prejudices about other groups. People often do not give some groups a chance before making judgements about them. They often make judgments that are based off of personal feelings or experiences. However, if people gave other groups a chance, they will be able to decrease their prejudices. Getting to know others and working together will allow people to increase their contact and decrease their differences. Therefore, understanding others’ experiences and giving them a chance can decrease prejudice.

Many people are different and have different cultures and religions and many people can be prejudice. Just because someone acts in a way we aren’t used to, it does not mean we can judge them only because they believe something different than what we are accustomed to. They may be different to due to their religious beliefs, or they might have a different skin color. So treat others they way you want to be treated. We don't know their story or why they are not the are not the same as us,but they could just be trying to adventure,make new friends, or just explore. What if they had one of those bad situations where they just have to move to a safer spot ,because of what's happening where they lived.

Religion and views on homosexuality are closely linked. As Amy Adamczyk and Cassady Pitt note in their research, “Shaping attitudes about homosexuality: The role of religion and cultural context,” “religion is often seen as an important predictor of attitudes about homosexuality.” The reason for this is because some people believe views on homosexuality are written into the Bible, and that this provides evidence with which to justify discrimination against homosexuals. Therefore, regularly attending church not only implies a strong affiliation and deeply held beliefs, but constant exposure to these views. Not all religions profess the same views on homosexuality, but the most popular one, the Catholic Church, tends to hold negative views on the subject. Albert L. Winseman’s paper “Religion Colors Teen Views of Gay Marriage” has also looked into this relationship, except this focuses explicitly on youth views.

Prejudice which means prejudgement where it displays attitude towards a social group (Hogg & Vaughan, 2011). This is a huge social issue within society has faced as it leads to many consequences that can end in violence. Homosexuality is an example of sexual minors facing prejudice from other social groups. There have been a number of prejudice and discrimination towards the gay community since the 1980’s where sexual behaviour between the same genders was not considered normal (Hogg & Vaughan, 2011). The influence of Christianity encouraged the prosecution of homosexuals which become labelled as a mental illness and considered an act that should be punishable. However, through protesting and fight for equality and gay rights gay marriage became legal in many parts of the world. Taking into consideration the legalisation of gay marriage, there is a continuation of discrimination against the gay community.

In the United States everything is done and judge by how a person looks, thinks, acts, what their sexual orientation is, and how much money one can make. With all these things comes sexual prejudice. Sexual prejudice is defined as “a negative attitude toward an individual because of his or her sexual orientation” (Herek, 2000). Sexual prejudice are made up with three main points, they are attitude based, often directed to a specific social group (i.e. gays and lesbians), and can often lead to extreme bad behavior and hostility. (Herek, 2000).