MMR Report 1.3
Restriction Enzyme, Alkaline phosphatase Digestion
and Gel Electrophoresis
By
Naga Srilekha Somu
Chemistry - 429
Spring 2016
Western Illinois University
Materials and Equipment:
Pure plasmid pET28a, amplified 2-alcohol dehydrogenase gene (a PCR product), 10x bovine serum albumin, 10x neutralization buffer, EcoRI, nuclease free water, pET28a plasmid digested with EcoRI, calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase, agarose gel (1% agarose + 0.3μL ethidium bromide), 1x TAE buffer (40mM Tris base + 0.1% acetic acid+ 1mM EDTA), pET28a plasmid digested alkaline phosphatase and EcoRI, DNA ladder, 6x loading buffer (30%glycerol + 0.25% bromophenol blue), parafilm, n-butanol TE buffer, 95% and 70% ethanol, TE buffer (10mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5) and 1mM EDTA were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Micropipettes, eppendorf tubes, eppendorf master cycler gradient, Labline orbit shaker, So-Low ultra low freezer and AvantiTM J-301 centrifuge.
Methodology:
For the quantitation of DNA both PCR and plasmid samples (1μL) were placed on the Nanodrop spectrophotometer separately and the absorbance was set to 260 nm which was measured for A260/A280 ratio. This was followed by the digestion of restriction enzyme. For this, both plasmid (1.6μL) and PCR (0.3μL) samples were mixed with 10x NE buffer, EcoRI and water separately in an eppendorf tube which was quick spin for 30 s at 1000g followed by incubation in Forma scientific water jacketed incubator for 15 min at 37°C. Before the
The following results helped obtain the haplogroup that in which the sequence of mtDNA would identify. The PCR reaction worked, and this can be determined by looking at the agarose gel in figure 1. If the PCR reaction was successful, than a band should appear around 550bp. Individual AC displays a band around 550bp, this means the PCR reaction was successful. The band for individual AC, depicts a low concentration of product, because the band faint. After the purification process the concentration, A260/280 ratio, and A260/A230 ratio were determined by using the nanodrop. The concentration of mtDNA in the product was 60.9 ng/uL. The ratio for A260/280 was 1.79 and the ratio for A260/230 was 0.77. The A260 and 280 are a spectrometer measurement that measure absorbance at wavelengths of
Restriction Enzyme Digestion – The experiment was begun after putting on gloves to avoid any chemical contact with the skin. Four microtest tubes were obtained, and each of them was labeled to contain the different enzymes or suspect DNA. Two of the microtest tubes were used for suspect one and the two different restriction enzymes, while two other microtest tubes were labeled for suspect two and the two restriction enzymes. After labeling the tubes, the contents that were at the bottom were taken out by slightly tapping them. Then to begin setting up the enzyme reactions, a micropipette was used to obtain 10 μL of the reaction buffer which was added to each of the four test tubes. The buffer is important because it carries the electrical current from the power supply in the gel. After the reaction buffer was in each, the microtest tubes were individually filled with their specific enzymes and DNA, shown in summary through Table 1.1 below. The restriction enzymes are used to cleave the DNA at specific
Four microcentrifuge tubes were placed in a rack, labeled and numbered, in order to identify the group and the DNA/restriction enzyme that it held. Each of the tubes initially received 10 microliters of reaction buffer. There were two samples of suspect DNA provided along with two restriction enzymes (EcoRI and HindIII). Tubes labeled 1 and 2 received 15 μL of DNA from suspect one while tubes 3 and 4 received 15 μL of DNA from suspect two. Following that, 15 μL of Enzyme 1 (EcoRI) were added to tubes 1 and 3, and 15 μL of Enzyme 2 (HindIII) were added to tubes 2 and 4. (Table 1). The tubes were then gently tapped on the counter to mix the DNA and enzyme solution followed by incubation at 37°C for 45 minutes. After incubation, 5 μL of 10x gel loading dye were added to each of the four tubes of suspect DNA. The tubes were then placed on ice while the gel was under preparation.
There were several steps used to acquire the colony necessary for the PCR. First a student forearm was swabbed using a cotton swab, the cells were then placed in an agar plate. DNA was then extracted from the cultured bacteria by using a technique to lyse the cells and solubilize the DNA, then enzymes were used to remove contaminating proteins. The DNA extraction consisted of a lysis buffer that contained high concentrations of salt for denaturing. Binding with the use of ethanol and a washing step to purify the DNA. The final step for the DNA extraction was elution where the pure DNA was release. Proceeding the extraction of DNA the results of the 16s gene amplification were examined through gel electrophoresis it was analyzed by estimating the size of the PCR bands with marker bands. After measuring the success of the extraction, a technique called TA cloning was started. Cloning of PCR products was done by using partially purified amplified products with
Throughout analysis of the data, we complete DNA agarose gel electrophoresis in order to determine the size of our plasmid DNA. The electrophoresis
The purpose of the experiment was to isolate plasmid DNA, followed by restriction digestion using restriction endonucleases and then visualizing the digested fragments after subjecting to gel electrophoresis. Plasmid DNA (pSP72 DNA) was isolated from Escherichia coli KAM32 (E.coli) cultures using the QIA prep miniprep kit and then subjected to restriction digestion by EcoRI and HindIII. The restriction digested DNA was then loaded into the wells of 0.7% agarose gel and subjected to electrophoresis. It can be concluded from our results that our plasmid DNA isolation was successful and the restriction digestion results were partially in agreement with our hypothesis.
Part three, first we made 2% agarose gel and let it harden while preparing our samples to load. Second, we took 10µL of our PCR reaction and put it into a tube labeled undigested and repeated this for a digested tube. Third, we added 1µL of HAEIII enzyme to the digested tube and placed in 37º water bath for 30 minutes so that it could digest. Once all done we loaded our samples to run through the agarose gel.
Restriction enzymes cut DNA at certain sites to create multiple DNA fragments. Restriction enzyme HindIII has known DNA fragment lengths and recognition sites when digesting lambda DNA, while the lambda DNA recognition site for restriction enzyme XhoI is unknown. The goal of this study is to determine the lambda recognition site of XhoI by comparing a HindIII digest and a HindIII and XhoI double digest on an electrophoresis gel. The HindIII digest had a band at 9.4 kb, but this band was not visible in the double digest, therefore we concluded the recognition site for XhoI was around 9.4kb. There were also two additional DNA
Experiment 1 & 2: The DNA concentration was 60 ng/µL (6.00*10^4 ng/mL). The total yield was 0.6 ng (60 ng/µL DNA /100 µL H2O). The DNA sample was divided by 100 µL instead of 25 µL of H2O because the sample was diluted 4 times.
Analysis of DNA from practicals 1 and 2 using the technique of agarose gel electrophoresis and analysis of transfomed E. coli from practical 2 (part B)
After the incubation, 1.5 mL of each of the three cultures were added to eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 13,200 rpm for 1 minute. An alkaline lysis procedure like that of Birnboim and Doly was then performed to extract the plasmid DNA with 200 μl of alkaline SDS detergent solution (Birnboim & Doly, 1979). After
Plasmids were extracted using the three-step alkaline lysis procedure as outlined by Kado and Liu, 1999. The extracted plasmids were then digested using 1 U of each XhoI and XbaI, respectively according to manufacturer’s (New England Biolabs) recommendation and ran on a 1% Tris Acetate EDTA (TAE) agarose gel. 1 μl of BioLine Hyperladder I was used as the DNA marker.
Nucleic acid molecules which are to be analyzed are set upon a viscous medium, thegel, where an electric field induces the nucleic acids to migrate toward the anode, due to the net negative charge of the sugar-phosphate backbone of the nucleic acid chain. The separation of these fragments is accomplished by exploiting the mobilities with which different sized molecules are able to pass through the gel. Longer molecules migrate more slowly because they experience more resistance within the gel. The DNA fragments of different lengths are visualized using a fluorescent dye specific for DNA, such asethidium bromide. The gel shows bands corresponding to different nucleic acid molecules populations with different molecular weight. Fragment size
The chemical and reagents used for the extraction and quantitation of DNA were: Plant DNAzol (0.3ml/0.1g), 100% ethanol (100%: 0.225 ml/0.1 g, 75%: 0.3 ml/0.1 g), Chloroform (0.3 ml/0.1 g), Plant DNAzol-ethanol solution: Plant DNAzol, 100% ethanol (1:0.75 v/v), TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0), 1.2% agarose gel (Agarose, 1X TAE buffer), 6X loading buffer (glycerol, Tris/EDTA pH 8.0, ethidium bromide), .25X TAE buffer, Restriction enzymes and Restriction endonuclease buffers. All the chemicals used were quality grade. The restriction
Plasmid DNA with Restriction Digest: The purpose of restriction digest of plasmid DNA is to understand how each DNA plasmids was cut with the given restriction enzymes and perform gel electrophoresis to observe the samples. Nine restriction digests were created, containing three digests for each of the three plasmid DNAs identifying as recombinant, non-recombinant, and unknown. Out of the nine digests, six are actual digests and three are undigested controls. A master mix is created to add to each of the nine samples with its following stock ingredients: 10 ul of 2X Reaction Buffer, 1 ul of Nco1, X ul of sterile water (Single digest), 10 ul of 2X Reaction Buffer, 10 ul plasmid DNA, 1 ul Nco1, 1 ul of Not1, and X ul of sterile water (Double