preview

Richard Inman's Case Summary

Decent Essays

As human beings, we are often presented with dilemmas that make us question our integrity and moral turpitude. School administrators, in particular, engage in multiple decision-making processes on a daily basis, as they are responsible for developing and maintaining a safe teaching and learning environment on their campus. In fact, Weaver (2007) adds that many school administrators make their decisions based on equity, fairness, and student achievement. After analyzing the case of Richard Inman, the junior high school assistant principal, it became evident that he made the decision not to complete the expulsion paper based on his personal code of ethics. That is, he made his decision based on his values, goals, and beliefs regarding the success of every student in his school. Moreover, because he was raised in the same neighborhood as his students, he felt he could identify with their struggles and therefore made a personal agenda to cultivate a relationship with the students …show more content…

Furthermore, standard 1.7 of the educators’ code of conduct expects teachers to adhere to local, state, and federal laws and policies, particularly in the decision-making process. Richard knowingly and intentionally made a decision not to comply with district policy to complete the expulsion papers for David. Chapter 37 of Texas Education Code mandates the expulsion for students who unlawfully carry prohibited weapons in the school premises. At a building principal’s perspective, it is not up to administrators to determine whether or not to expel David. Ultimately, rules are implemented to ensure safe learning and teaching environment for students and staff, and it is the responsibility of school principals to ensure that all campus personnel complies with school board policies, despite the

Get Access