From the Sugar Act to the Townshend Acts, colonists were getting zero say in Parliament despite their civil efforts. There was only one choice left- a choice that would set them on the road to independence. The colonists separated from Britain with good reason. They were getting no say in Parliament, the British had been killing many without reason in the Boston Massacre, and the distance between America and Britain is so large, that there was no sense in one controlling the other. The colonists were undoubtedly justified in becoming Patriots and seeking independence from Britain. The colonists were right to separate from Britain because they were getting no say in Parliament. When the Stamp Act of 1765, a law requiring all legal and commercial …show more content…
It made no sense that with those countries so far apart, one would own the other. When looking at just the colonies, one might say that Georgia was the most “out of the loop”, because they were so far away from the rest of the colonies. This same logic applies for America and England, except in this case, the distance is exponentially larger. This being said, it was completely nonsensical that Britain would own, and be in control of the colonists. “Common Sense” by Thomas Paine was a pamphlet written to convince colonists that a break was needed from Britain. One point Paine makes in his writing is that “Everything this is right or natural pleads for separation” (“Common Sense”). This means that in the eyes of Paine, all the events that had been happening have just been signs telling the colonists “Tis time to part”. Within this same document, Paine states that “Even the distance which Almighty had placed England and America is strong and natural proof that the authority of one over the other was never the design of heaven” (“Common Sense”). Here Paine is saying that the natural distance between the two places is reason enough that it is unreasonable that one would control the other. With the vast area between to the two lands comes bad communication and lack thereof. For this reason, colonists were indeed justified in wanting independence and
The founding fathers had a good amount of reasons for rebelling against the British government and declaring independence. The Colonist felt that the government was not protecting their rights as citizens and lost the right to rule them. The taxation system wasn't fair and they were not represented in Parliament.
When the Britain passed the Royal Proclamation the colonists did not follow the law and still settled in the west. They pushed Cherokees out, paying no mind to the Treaty of Fort Stanwix, and kept moving west, which helped establish American nationalism. In the First Continental Congress, none of the colonies were talking about independence yet because all they wanted to do was resolve the issues. They began to take the idea of self-rule and participatory democracy into rule. The colonies began to think their rights were being taken away from them by Britain when Parliament and the King rejected their petition. They began to think ideas of freedom when British troops were being sent to the colonies to establish authorization by Parliament and the King. They didn’t think they could stand up to Britain because they were more powerful and the colonists didn’t have the proper kind of training or weapons. The thoughts of freedom became more real, after the Boston Massacre and after Lexington and Concord. When the colonists finally realized the British would use force to keep them in line and to keep control over them.
The colonists began to question if independence was for them when parliament passed the Stamp Act. The stamp act was meant to raise money for British soldiers and also to pay off some of Britain’s debt. When the King/Parliament passed laws the colonists believed that if they weren’t there when the laws were passed they were illegal (according to the Bill of Rights), which is where the slogan “no taxation against representation” came in to play. The people wanted to separate from England because of how the king only passed laws that benefited him. Colonists had a problem with their government. Thomas Paine says that government is a necessary evil. He says that their government is being hampered by oppression; he believed, along with other people, that the King was leading cruelly and not caring about his people. The Declaration of Independence also says, “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government”. Thomas Jefferson is saying that the laws that the King/Parliament were passing were becoming destructive and it was the right of the people to become independent or change their
The American colonists were justified in fighting a war to break away from Britain because they were not being represented by Britain. For example, a member of the British Parliament was against taxing without representation. He said that taxation and representation are inseparable. In addition, the colonists were
The American colonists were justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain because of Acts that British pass and Britain tyranny. The first reason that why American colonists
American colonists were justified after their separation from Great Britain and gaining independence. At first, the colonists didn’t mind being apart of the British colonies. However, colonists were upset at the fact that the British were abusing their power and being unjust. Soon later, with the help of Enlightenment views from several American philosophers, the colonists wanted to break free from the British crown’s chains.
For many years, the American colonists have tried to fight for their independence from Britain. The British needed financial support because of the debt of the French-Indian war and looked towards the colonists. The British taxed in various acts including the Stamp Act and the Townshend Act, which taxed daily goods and all stamps. At the same time, the Boston Massacre and propaganda news was being spread causing even more uproar. All of this uproar, would have never happened if the British were justified for their actions.
What caused the colonies to separate from Great Britain was that Great Britain decided that people in the colonies needed to have troops to maintain the peace between the colonists. They hated that the British had neglected them for so long and then out of nowhere they came and made changes that the colonies did not agree on. This caused some major controversy between the colonist and the troops, that later lead to the event of the Boston Massacre, where five colonist where killed. To make matters worst the Parliament decided to tax the colonist for the “helping” of the troops as well as restricting where people could settle. In 1764 and 1765 the sugar and stamp act were passed latter followed by the taxation on imports such as paper, pain,
Paine argues for the independence of the American colonies by providing multiple reasons for why he thinks they should leave Great Britain. Most of the reasons center around war, especially the fact that anybody Great Britain goes to war with, will also be at war with the American colonies. The American colonies cannot ally with any other countries because of their ties with England, and therefore will be missing out on opportunities and might get involved in something they don’t want to be part of due to them being part of England. The many kingdoms in Great Britain also increase chances of going to war, which would not be good for the colonies at all. Paine also argues that America is too far away to be part of England still, making it hard for them to communicate, and also for Great
A quote from the pamphlet the was written by thomas paine says that “Even the distance of which the almighty hath placed england and america is a strong and natural proof” (Paine, 3). The pamphlet was unsurprisingly called “Common Sense” and it was very sensible. Now while Britain did Found the colonies, The colonies had to feed themselves, export goods to britain, fend off hostile tribes, and pay taxes on top of that. Trying to become independent what be justified simply because of the distance from the colonies to Britain.
Prior to the Revolutionary War, during the 1760s, the contradicting opinions among the colonists living in England’s thirteen colonies separated them into two major groups, those loyal to the king and to Great Britain and those patriotic to colonial America. While the loyalists were content to be English subjects and wanted to remain under the protection of England, the patriots felt that it was essential that the colonies obtain their liberty from England. Some colonists were strongly opinionated, while others were undecided. However, a series of events, including the Proclamation of 1763, the Stamp Acts, the Townshend Duties, the Quartering Acts, the Boston Massacre, and the Intolerable Acts, caused the majority of colonists to desire
Congress rejected British plans requiring allegiance to the monarchy and rejection of independence. As a result of protests by colonists, there was the Boston Tea Party in 1773 during which patriots destroyed a batch of taxed tea from the Parliament which controlled and favored East India Company. The people wanted to be heard, they didn’t want to be controlled. The colonists wanted a say in what goes on in their country because that’s why many came to America, they wanted to escape the harsh environment of the tyrants who lead their country.
The colonist was justified in separating from Britain. The colonist wanted a place where they could be free and a place away from British rule, but the British decided to stay. After the French-Indian War, Britain was in debt. They decided to tax the colonist for certain good to pay for the debt. They thought the colonist would cooperate because he war benefited the colonist the most, but the colonist didn’t stating that the taxes violated their rights as British citizens. After the Stamp Act was put into action, the Sons of Liberty was formed to protest British goods.
Independence is important when conducting an audit. However, the fact that the word “independence” already appears in the auditor’s report mean that the auditors should be independent. When the word “independence” is repeated later in the report, it does not add to investor’s confidence. The independent of an auditor is understood and should be stated once, therefore creating less clutter in the auditor’s report. Simply stating that an auditor is independent more often does not have significant changes in the auditor’s behavior.
Secondly, the Americans were unjustified in their separation from Britain because they had a biased view against all that the British did. One well known event that occurred before the American Revolution was the Boston Massacre (History.com Staff, “Boston Massacre”). It occurred on the 5th of March in 1770. A bunch of British soldiers came to support a sentry that was being harassed and taunted by a crowd of American colonists. In response, the British fired. Three were immediately dead upon the first shots and another two died due to extensive wounds. After the event, some important colonial men - such as Benjamin Franklin and Paul Revere - started to spread propaganda to try and get colonists to support them in fighting for their independence (Insider, Business). Some include the disjointed snake, illustrated in 1754 and a print that depicted an armless and legless person illustrated to repeal the Stamp Act - both drawn by Benjamin Franklin. Yet, one very noteworthy piece of propaganda, engraved by Paul Revere in 1770, depicts the story of the Boston Massacre. But, based on the engraving, the story was completely different than what actually had happened (Document 3). According to the engraving, the colonists were not fighting and the British were killing “innocents” because they “felt like it”. However, in Document 3, the description says that the British fired because they were threatened. Because of the biased views of influential American leaders such as Benjamin