“Security isn’t so much a problem in the school, but this is another precaution that we can take,” says Pat Gallagher, an American physicist and the eighteenth chancellor of the University of Pittsburgh. The run/fight and lockdown drills would not work in some situations, when gunmen come into the school or try to break in. Woodlynde needs a security guard to protect the children and teachers while they try to run away from school or hide inside the rooms. This is why Woodlynde needs security guards and not just the safety drills inside Woodlynde’s protection routine.
For run and fight drills, the teachers teach the children to run out assigned doors and to run away. There is the other option, where the people in the school fight off the gunman or intruder to protect the others. The problem with this drill is that there could be two or more gunmen assaulting the school with no way out. We have assigned spots to run to and escape, but that just leaves everyone running in the same direction. This could lead the school into a
…show more content…
It is not really safe because the gunman might attempt to break down the door by kicking it or firing the gun through the door. This would trap the people inside, and it would cause a massacre of students in that one classroom, while the other classrooms would use this as an opportunity to make their escape. The only bad thing is that it leaves behind a bunch of students and a couple teachers dead in the school shooting. The lockdown drill is a terrible idea, and it should not be used in these situations of gunmen entering the school. Well, it might be useful if it was a wild animal inside the school. Then this lockdown drill would fit that purpose, but not for a gunman. That is why Woodlynde needs a security guard or two to protect the students and teachers from danger instead of these two
After the Sandy Hook, there were countless ways for students to be safe at school. In Preparing for the Unthinkable: School Safety after Sandy Hook news article, Vicki Bauman said, “ Instead of gates, guns, and metal detectors, let’s invest in the things we know will make us safer: counselors, health care, teaching positive behavior, and making sure we have services to reach out to disconnected youth and pull them back on track.” Therefore, violence is not the answer to any question or issue. The community and school system should take a stand and get the necessities that the schools need to have a safe environment for the students and faculty and staff. The school can invest in law enforcement. The law enforcement will be able to conduct a consistent search through a metal detector. The law enforcement will help the students to avoid bringing prohibited weapons to school as well as, there to protect the school.
A school administrator roams the halls to make sure all doors are locked and all students are hidden from what might be a school shooter if this scenario was not a drill. "You're training the kids," Weicker said. Similar drills which, in some states, are attended by armed and masked SWAT teams are now practiced routinely in nearly three-quarters of schools, according to a recent survey of 445 administrators funded by the American Association of School Administrators. The Columbine High School Massacre was the worst high school shooting in U.S. history and prompted a national debate on gun control laws and school safety regulations. Now we can live in a society they is a lot safer due to this laws and regulations schools and states have made to
Even though students can be freaked out, they should ask themselves if they would rather be freaked out and be alive at officers that are there to protect them or be dead because their school was shot up and the police couldn’t get there quick enough. Kevin Quinn president of the National Association of School Resource Officers worries that an armed teacher may actually put kids more at risk instead of protecting them. Having an armed teacher on campus also could complicate matters for a responding officer who doesn't know if the teacher is an employee or the shooter. Teachers are trained to protect their students so they would end up staying in their rooms protecting their students, and that is what officers at the school are for so teachers have no point to leave their
Over the past several years gun violence in schools has been led into many news stories. From the 1999 Columbine Shooting in Colorado to the Sandy Hook Massacre in Massachusetts, the death of students by armed intruders has ignited a debate among many Americans. At the root of this argument is the question: Should teachers and school staff be armed? Some argue schools would be safer if this occurs. The fact of the matter is; it would make schools a more dangerous place to be. Placing untrained individuals into a stressful school environment where their decisions have life or death consequences is a horrible idea.
A siren sounds from the intercom and the familiar voice of the secretary that you passed on the way into school everyday saying “student this is a code red.” All the students huddle in a corner classroom and duck down out of sight while our teacher scrambles for her keys to lock the door and turn off the lights quickly. These drills are used to prepare students incase of an intruder in the building. Students are taught these drills from Kindergarten to Senior year of high school. In kindergarten these drills are great because you’re still in the world of fairy tails where you're safe no matter where you go and an adult will protect you from anything. As you get older you began to realize these drills are actually practical and you're not safe anymore. How many stories have been told about mass shootings in schools?
Most of the staff and teachers are also trained in CPR. Studies have shown that the first few minutes of someone going into cardiac arrest are the most critical. There is no time to wait for the ambulance to arrive before life-saving action is taken. Many lives are saved by the intervention given in the time between when the person is in distress and the time the ambulance or medical personnel arrive on the scene. The same precaution should be taken to ensure that in the case of a school shooting, action can be taken in the critical minutes before the police arrive. While schools do prepare for specific situations such as having active shooter drills, this does nothing to incapacitate or disable the imminent threat, the shooter. There are many reasons why people are adamantly against arming staff in schools. One is they fear it will turn schools into a prison type of environment, and not a nurturing and learning one. The picture that cartoonist Pat Bagley paints with his satirical drawing “Totally Safes Schools” is a perfect example of this mentality. Bagley draws a school surrounded by high towers, barbed wire, “good guys with guns”, and a school bus with a .50 caliber long gun mounted on the top (503). When in fact, schools would look nothing like this if just a few staff members were armed. Are pupils’ senses so insulted by having fire extinguishers and defibrillators on the wall, that school now feels
Over the last thirty years, there have been many different methods to preparing for an active shooter in a school. These methods include lock down, code words, run/hide/flight, and Alert, Lock down, Inform, Counter, Evacuate. (A.L.I.C.E). Some of these methods have been more effective than others.
Today, my child practices “active shooter drills” in his elementary school. Police officers roam the halls, simulated gunfire is employed, and the children hide in the closet. Why not employ the methods of the cold war to protect our society, Mutually Assured Destruction, provide our educators and others licensed to carry the opportunity to defend the lives of our youth with deadly force. Stated simply and appropriately, “Governor Greg Abbott, a Republican who supports campus carry, said a gunman could already bring a firearm on to campus, and the law could prevent mass shootings because someone with a licensed concealed weapon could be ready to confront a gunman.” (Herskovitz – Reuters
It is a sorry sight to see how often and numerous school shootings take place in this country. These students instead of going to school only focused on working to further their education, rather have to be worried of the threat of a school shooting. There are days given to drills which take time out of the class and learning opportunities.
A lot of people believe that the best alternative would be to have a hired security guard or law enforcement guarding the school at all times. This idea is better because it allows the teachers to be at peace by not having to worry about if they would be ending a life. "If I'm going to have a gun on the premises I'd rather have a resource officer who has been trained," Martin said. "If I'm going to defend myself in the community, I'm not firing around potentially 1,000 kids." By hiring security the school would be protected from any intruders. Security would be trained to shoot with precision at any gunman. The security could also help protect against violence within the school. If a fight breaks out, a security guard would be able to stop
“Somebody call 911 and lock down the school! There’s an intruder with a gun, and he’s holding a class at gunpoint!” yells the principal. According to School Guard, the average police response time is 18 minutes, and the average school shooting lasts twelve and a half (“Why SchoolGuard?”). By the time the police arrive, the criminal has vanished but left many students and staff fighting for their lives. Providing the safest environment possible should be a very important aspect to a school, so teachers should be able to defend themselves against a situation like this. Faculty and staff members armed with guns here would have probably been able to solve this problem almost instantly. Teachers with a concealed and carry license should be permitted to carry a gun for many reasons such as students feel more comfortable and safer when guns are around, and it saves time and lives.
Classroom intercoms blare on without warning, “Shelter in place!” is yelled clearly throughout the school building. Doors ae locked and lights are turned off, your teacher rushes you and your classmates to a corner in complete silence. You as a student truly don’t know if you and your friends are safe in this moment. This is a school shooting.
As we know that the guards are well trained and they are used to with such kind of problems. They are not even scared of shooting etc. They are always ready to help people. In case shooting takes place at school and even if the teachers are armed, they may get panic and scared and can use their in wrong way. In this case, the idea of soldiers is better as they know how to use their weapons and when to use them. They know better than anyone else. But we don’t have as many guards. Because of this reason, President Trump decided that instead of hiring guards, he would use that many to train the teachers to get armed, so that they can also react like soldiers if anything like shooting takes place at
How do we allow a gunman to come into our children's school? How do they get through security? What security is there?" she yelled. "The gunman -- a crazy person -- just walks right into the school, knocks down the window of my child's door and starts shooting. Shooting her! And killing her!"
Many people criticize the proposal of new locks and suggest that there are other methods that will accomplish the same goal, however none are quite as effective or immediate as installing new locks. Other defensive measures can be put into place, such as cameras, but these measures will not be as immediate or effective of a solution as better locks. Cameras may catch the perpetrator the morning after, when the robbery and break-in is discovered, but having solid doors and secure locks will prevent the crime from happening in the first place. If the criminal can not enter the school, the people inside can have a better peace of mind that they are protected along with their valuable equipment.