preview

School Dress Codes: Article Analysis

Decent Essays

The editorial School dress codes reinforce the message that woman’s bodies are dangerous written by Laura Bates, brings to our attention, the sexism that surrounds the application of dress codes. In the article Bates discusses how, although there are rules for male and female students, girls are mainly punished for dress code violations, and the same dress code rules do not apply for both sexes. Young boys wear athletic shorts however, girls cannot, in some cases, girls cannot show their legs at all. In addition to the sexism in dress codes, is the sexual objectification and publicly shaming of young girls, who are told that showing their legs while wearing skirts is distracting to the male faculty; alongside being publicly shamed by being …show more content…

Mead had four points to his theory, “the self is not their at birth: it develops”, “the self develops only with social experience”, “social experience is the exchange of symbols” and “seeking meaning leads us to imagine the intentions of others”. The theory of social behaviourism helps to expand on Bates editorial. School ought to be a place where children and young adults develop the “self”; Mead defines self as “the part of an individual’s personality composed of self-awareness and self-image”. However, as we see in Bates editorial, girls are being denied the opportunity to develop the self in a growing number of schools today. With dress codes telling impressionable young girls that it is inappropriate to show their legs, backs, shoulders and stomachs, their opportunity to develop their own personality is being taken away, as shown in Mead’s second point of his theory; who we become as adults depends on the what social experiences are exposed to us as children and teenagers. Exposing girls to a world where expressing themselves is not allowed without recourse stifles their individuality and does not allow for their personality to …show more content…

Lately it is becoming a prejudiced social norm of signalling out and shaming females based on their appearance, whilst allowing males to appear however they please without any social backlash. According to Mead, personality relies solely on circumstance and not linked to biology, if this is the case; schools need to create an environment that does not impose gender stereotypes and rape culture on impressionable youth. Generalized other, a term used by Mead meaning “widespread cultural norms and values we use as a reference in evaluating ourselves”, is another example of how we are hurting the personalities and development of youth today with this rampant sexism. Due to the fact that we use social norms and values as a way to determine whether or not we are good enough, or fit into society, schools should ensure that the norm isn’t that girls are sexual objects. Additionally it should not be that a female’s body is dangerous and should be hidden away in the hopes that it does not distract anyone, perpetuating rape culture at such a young age.
Mead’s theory looking glass self, “a self–image based on how we think others see us”, also affects young girls exposed to sexist dress codes. Being publically shamed by authoritative adults for one’s appearance does not have a positive affect on a young girls self esteem. How can girls

Get Access