preview

Self Representation and the Self-Defeating Speaker in Jonathan Swift

Better Essays

Because Swift constructs a speaker who is meant to be seen as himself in “Verses on the Death of Dr. Swift, D.S.P.D.”, his approach to the satire changes, taking on a more playful approach. The poem is more personal than political, and is more comedic in the sense that he satirizing himself as well as other people groups. The self-defeating rhetorical approach is embodied in this poem in the way that he puts himself down and exposes his own follies throughout the poem. While this is no doubt somewhat tongue-in-cheek, this in some ways frees Swift from criticism from outside sources. It is difficult to wager criticism at someone who has already wagered it against himself. While this could also be seen as poking fun at other writers who are …show more content…

The way in which Swift presents his speaker’s ridiculous ideas in “A Modest Proposal” not only projects negatively onto his political opinions, but also depicts his own opinions by positioning himself as opposite to his speaker. Swift presents his own opinions by endowing his speaker’s with a shocking lack of empathy for human beings, implying that Swift himself is at the other end of the spectrum. In Erin Mackie’s article "Swift And Mimetic Sickness", she postulates that “In ‘A Modest Proposal’ Swift mimics the modern policy man to exhibit his incapacity, at once cognitive and visceral, to register a categorical, that is epistemological, failure and its accompanying moral horrors. With his plan for factory farming Irish infants, the Modern Projector makes us sick precisely because he is not sickened” (364). In doing so, Swift not only establishes himself in the opposite camp, but also positions anyone who disagrees with his political stance to become identified with the cannibalistic speaker in “A Modest Proposal”. In spite of the fact that his speaker’s unfeelingness is perhaps exaggerated, it is hard to win an argument in which you are embodying the role of an upper-class cannibal. Thus, Swift’s self-defeating representation of the upper-class causes any upper class person's opinion against Swift to be preemptively invalid in an epistemological sense.
The mimesis that Mackie alludes

Get Access