Separating School Sports

There is a problem schools have to deal with, and it’s about sports. People may argue that getting rid of recreational physical activities is a terrible choice; however, many studies show getting rid of athletics benefits the students. Therefore, schools should get rid of extracurricular sports because they cost an abundance of money, they are a distraction, and abolishing them results in higher student

For a period people have debated whether or not to get rid of school sports. Students can get off track of learning when they're playing sports, districts realized they could save over 150,000 dollars in a year, and students have extra time to do homework and study. Therefore, schools should not have sports because kids can prevent distractions, schools could save a great deal of money, students can have more time to learn.

Parents and administrators have been wondering of sports are literally helping, or harming education. Schools have had after-school activities for decades, but this has made too difficult for many students to finish their work. Therefore, sports should be removed to increase the ability to save money, improve grades, and give kids the opportunity to pay more attention in class.

Have you ever gone to a game or watched a game, like some kind of sport on TV? Or know someone that plays any kind of sport? Many schools have sport programs after school and because of this some people are failing school, districts running out of money to use for the school, instead, using it for school sports. By suspending sports districts can save thousands of dollars, people won’t be failing as much as they use to because they don’t have sports in mind to distract them from learning. Schools should get rid of sports for the benefit of the school.

In “The Case Against High School Sports,” Amanda Ripley, a journalist for The Atlantic, states that America is spending more money on high school sports rather than on academic purposes. “High School Sports Aren’t Killing Academics, “ written by Daniel Bowen, a postdoctoral scholar at Rice University, and Colin Hitt, an assistant professor at the University of Arkansas, discusses the benefits that come out of sports programs to improve the classroom and the school’s social capital. Co-founder of a sports recruiting social network, Kai Sato’s article “The Case For High School Sports,” focuses on how school does not just involve scoring well on a math test but to educate us to be productive in what lies ahead. Ripley’s article discusses how

After reading " The Case Against High School Sports" by Amanda Ripley started to make me think. There were many strong points about how the priorities of the sports are beginning to be more important to students than their education. Another great point was that the financing and budgeting is unfairly distributed throughout school districts and is spent more on athletics and clubs and not enough on classes. And I Believe that schools should put certain restrictions on the spending and promoting or in school sports and clubs because of the major drop in national and world comparisons.

Many people are debating whether or not school sports should be removed due to the critical consequences they are having on young athletes academic, and social lives. Studies have proven that cutting sports from schools can improve students grades in a plethora of ways. Therefore, school sports should be taken away to prevent students from failing classes, save districts money, and allow children the study time they need.

After school sports are a big thing in America. Although students cherish these activities; numerous studies have shown that students get better grades if they drop out of sports. Therefore, schools should get rid of after-school sports because they are expensive, students will get better grades, and athletics is a distraction from school work.

Could you be able to not have sports at your school the fun friday night games and the pepper ally before when you get so hyped ? The article “ Should Schools get Rid of Sports” by Amanda Ripley is about sports in schools is a bad thing. The second article “ Sports are more Important than Everything” by Tim O'Shei is about sports are good things in school. School’s that have no sports are good;however,school should have sports. “

For the past 50 years in America, schools have made it a tradition to play sports in schools. But schools have been crushing the future for their students because they allow sports in schools. While students and parents feel that sports in schools are appropriate and valuable, that is just simply not the case and schools have just gone too far. Schools should eliminate sports programs because sports programs put a financial burden on schools, getting rid of sports will increase in academics and students can get injured when playing sports.

I walk through the locker room. Everyone is patting me on the back after I won MVP and the championship. “ Being a student today is harder than ever. You are being held to tougher academic standards - and so is your school. The stress can get so intense, it feels paralyzing. Schools should keep their sports programs because sports help kids with academic achievements and it helps kids manage their mental and emotional health.

Schools should get rid of sports. Although many people think that sports are relaxing and stress relieving; numerous studies say that for sport players in particular, the lack of time to do work and sleep is crushing them socially, physically, and academically. Therefore, districts should get rid of after school sports because the cost is extreme, this would aid students academically, and they are a

High School sports are safe havens for people all over America. Kids grow up and dream of bringing home state championships for the town they grew up in. However, more often than not they fall short. Public schools are at an extreme disadvantage in high school sports due to the simple fact that they draw from a set area of kids, while private schools can pick and choose. This leads to a question if whether public and private schools should be in a separate division for high school sports. Public and private schools should be in a separate division due to their ability to recruit, absolute dominance in sports and dwindling attendance of fans at sporting events.

Every year, thousands of kids move to the United States from all over the world. Something that constantly surprises them is, sports are a big deal in American schools. But some schools are taking away sports. Schools should get rid of sports.

In America, sports are a big deal, but most schools do not have sports because it uses a large amount of their funds and the money can be used for the students education, and other supplies. Amanda Ripley states that “in the spring of 2012, Premont Independent school district in Texas was in trouble, the district had to move the middle school to a high school building and the elementary school hadn’t had a music teacher in years” (10). The author goes to say that, “new bleachers can cost half a million dollars, maintaining a grass field can cost more than $20,000 a year” (11). It shows that people care a lot about sports and those who do get decent grades but without sports students pass more classes, schools can save money, and students have more time to finish their assignments. Clearly, schools have sports but without these programs districts can save money and have extra money to buy school essentials.