Sepulveda VS. Bartolome de Las Casas

1205 WordsFeb 1, 20083 Pages
The argument of Juan Gines de Sepulveda is that of negative feedback to what was experienced in the first encounter of the Spaniards and American Indians in the Sixteenth Century. Also, Sepulveda demonstrates through his opinion that war against the Indians is a rightful act due to the fact that the Indians are seen as lower beings. The proof that Sepulveda uses to support his position is the glimpse the Spaniards noted in the short time they observed the Indians. Sepulveda thought that the Indians were uneducated individuals that were uncivilized in the way they conducted their lives. This can be seen in that Sepulveda comments on how Indians are not educated because they seem not to have an alphabet, any knowledge of the sciences, or any…show more content…
Even though the Indians were seen as uneducated because they were different it is in no way a reason to justify the Spaniard 's goal of waging war against them. In contrast, the Indians were able to learn new ways from the Spaniards such as getting new weapons to protect themselves with, learn about the sciences, record keeping, and the alphabet. Third, the Conquistador 's justified their opinion by their goal of spreading the Christian faith. This can

More about Sepulveda VS. Bartolome de Las Casas

Open Document