Sherman Argumentative Essay

Sadly, their weapons did not have the ability to cut all the wire and destroy deep German trenches or knock out all enemy guns. It also could not provide a useful bombardment for the infantry attack. On July 1, the artillery drifted away from the German front trenches and left the infantry unattended. Nobody was

While the Germans had the upper hand in technology, this condition did have its drawbacks. This advanced weaponry was costly to manufacture, so the German Army could not afford to produce them in large quantities. On top of that, this new weaponry was also more difficult to repair and maintain, which reduced its efficiency even further (Stewart, 6).

Tanks were a major part of World War II. Many countries had their own tanks which they used in different strategies during the war. These vehicles were invented long before there was the technology of World War II. The Germans were known for their heavy class tanks, while the Americans were recognized for their medium Sherman tanks. The Allied forces would not have won World War II if it were not for their tanks.

Another important reason for the defeat of Germany is the effective integration of technologies which the Allies had employed by the end of the war. By the end of the war Allied (particularly British) command had improved technologies and had learnt to use them better than earlier in the war. Technologically, the Allies had a great advantage in 1918 onwards: Germany had some very high quality, but very few tanks and aircraft. By the war's end, Germany had 45 tanks whilst the Allies had almost 3,500, and even Germany's 45 tanks were mostly Allies tanks in disrepair or Germany's notoriously unreliable A7V. The Allies also had an air advantage: by late 1918

They overcame those obstacles by mounting the flamethrowers on tanks. The U.s is the most famous for vehicle mounted flamethrowers such as the “Oke”, the “Badger”, and probably the most famous out of all of them was known as the “Churchill Crocodile”. The tank was very similar to the flamethrower as in it was very good at driving out defenders out of caves, tunnels, bunkers or trenches, which made them a likely pair that worked very well together. This dynamic duo was not discovered until 1935 with the Italians. It wasn't too much longer and the Germans starting to take use of the Italians

The use of tanks allowed an attack to be carried out without threat from machine guns or rifle fire, as Richard Haigh, a British tank commander, details in Life in a Tank (Document 7). Thick, metal armor protected the crew of a tank from all but the most powerful artillery shells. Tanks were armed with machine guns to attack exposed enemy infantry and artillery to destroy enemy fortifications. The tank’s use as a purely pragmatic weapon was not as devastating as its effect on the spirit of soldiers defending against armor, German General Hindenburg remarks in his report on the Battle of

That said, they had ten times the number of tanks, and like Stalin said “Quantity is a quality all itself”. (Russ,2011) There were three major things that went wrong for Canadians in the battle. The first was it started raining cancelling out any chance of air support and turning everything into mud, furthermore the Germans broke the dams and flooded the fields making it incredibly difficult to move and utilize tanks. Another thing that went wrong was that the Germans were able to make tank traps and killzones to obliterate large numbers of tanks and troops. Some of the tank traps included trenches that tanks couldn’t cross which consequently made them go down small narrow paths, then anti- tank guns fired from a distance and took out the first and last tank in the line, all the rest were sitting ducks waiting for their demise.*VIDEO INFO*. The Germans of the Rhineland battles fought much harder against all other forces as they had their backs against their countries borders and most fought with the sentimentality of “ I’d rather die and take as many of them as I can then become a prisoner.” this caused for tricks like pretending to surrender then machine gunning the Canadians who came out of cover. Throughout all of the Rhineland campaign 40,000 Germans lay died and 230,000 were taken prisoner.(No Author,2011) Once it was all said and done this battle had become the most ravaging battle on Canadians and for the soldiers it was more of a “Thank God it’s over” than a “we won!!”. This battle impacted Canadians greatly because it was the homestretch into Germany and although we had the weather, the terrain,superior tanks,incredibly hostile German troops and trap after agonizing trap, we still won. Therefore this showed how the Middle power Canadian troops could compete with the Superpowers and claim victory with so much stacked against them, and so many

)although the planes helped the allies bitter fighting would still continue. Although the Germans had an upper hand on the Allies on the ground, they had heavy tanks or the king tiger tank it was introduced in 1944 the king tiger tank was one of the most feared weapons on the battle field. It boasted an 88mm cannon. Compared to the Americans 75mm cannon the tiger also had a longer barrel which increased the velocity of the 88mm gun. The tiger not only had a big gun it had a lot of armor with 150mm of frontal armor.

The factors that made the Allied victory happen include the Germans beginning to effectively organize industrial production at the very least six months too late to give them a chance at victory. By the time they got the production to be swiftly working on weapons such as fighter planes, the Allies were in firm enough control of the air space. This meant that the Allied bombing prevented the German economy from reaching it’s full potential. Another flaw in the German production meant that tanks such as Tigers and Panthers, of which dominated tactical situations on the battlefield, had logistical and maintenance nightmares. If the Germans were to overcome their problems in production then it would have stood them in much greater stead, giving them an advantage over the Allies.

The Battle of the Bulge, a massive German counteroffensive which began in December 1944, ultimately produced the largest casualty rate in any one battle throughout World War II. The Allied Forces alone lost almost 80,000 at the Battle of the Bulge. This casualty rate could have been much higher if Hitler would’ve grasped the importance and value of supply and logistical support. As a result, more than 1,500 tanks within Hitler’s most elite Panzer units simply ran out of gas only days after the “Bulge” broke through the Allied western front lines. However, the purpose of this paper is not to examine what could

One of the main reasons the Germans were so successful with Blitzkrieg warfare was because Blitzkrieg warfare utilized all of the modern technologies to its

The Allied forces essentially had more personnel, weaponry and munitions supplies. This, along with their ability to develop tactics and engage all elements of the battlefront, supported the perpetuation of ‘Total War’ and the allies’ victory.

Tanks had been used prior to Villers-Bretonneux in World War One, with the very first use of them coming on the 15th of September, 1916, during the Battle of the Somme, by the British. They were used many times between then and Villers-Bretonneux, during various battles throughout Europe. It was, however, at Villers-Bretonneux that the first tank versus tank battle in history unfolded. The tanks involved were the British Mark IV tanks, which came in male and female versions (the female only had machine guns while the males had cannons as well), the British Mark A Whippet tanks, and the German A7V tanks. The battle ended in a tight British victory, with the driver of one of the British tanks being awarded the Military Cross for his actions. This tank battle shaped the future of warfare, both in World War One and beyond. It was significant as it provided an example of how tanks could be used to destroy an enemy’s resources and gain a strategic advantage in a battle. Without the occurrence of this tank battle, future warfare could have been vastly different to how it is

Both sides of the war used these tanks because of their sturdy structure and build. The purpose for its build was the overthrow the previous and outdated medium tank. The first country the Sherman tank engaged in combat was in North Africa. This tank was very infamous for catching on fire easily. This tank easily weighs in at 30 tons, can hit an average speed of about twenty five miles per hour, can obtain a total of 174 gallons of gas, and can fit a maximum of 5 men inside of it. The M3-Stuart tank was also another popular tank the Americans used at the time. This tank was assessed with a thirty-seven millimeter lightweight machine gun mounted on the top. The thirty-seven millimeter gun was better for shooting targets with light armor and can only fit four men inside compared to the five men of the Sherman tank. The M3-Stuart tank was most first made 1942 and was most commonly used in 1942 also.

     In the first phase of World War II in Europe, Germany sought to avoid a long war. Germany's strategy was to defeat its opponents in a series of short campaigns. Germany quickly overran much of Europe and was victorious for more than two years by relying on a new military tactic called the "Blitzkrieg" (lightning war). Blitzkrieg tactics required the concentration of offensive weapons (such as tanks, planes, and artillery) along a narrow front. These forces would drive a breach in enemy defenses, permitting armored tank divisions to penetrate rapidly and roam freely behind enemy lines, causing shock and