Schlegel’s position of how people regard the environment is that, first of all human beings will do whatever they want, whenever they want while they remain as “Gray, motionless figures” (Schlegel, 1977, 1). However, Schlegel goes on to say that all that he sees around him is light and color which could mean that when he looks around and sees nature, he sees beauty, wonder, joy, color, happiness, etc. He continues to talk about how nature is always beautiful even if the world isn’t in the best state. Schlegel makes many poetic references to how beautiful nature truly is he goes on to say things like: “A fresh, warm breath of life and love fanned me, rustling and stirring in all the branches of the verdant grove. I gazed and enjoyed it all, …show more content…
For instance, Jonas’s view of nature as being dominated by technology is something that I 100% agree with I do believe that nature should be preserved and that technology is destroying nature as a whole. It should also be taken into consideration that technology is needed for many different things in the world. Jonas’s viewpoint of saying that nature needs to be untouched by man is something that I do disagree with. However, I don’t disagree with his viewpoint because it is wrong necessarily I disagree with it because I know that as a race we need to continue to make advancements in inventions in order to survive. I believe that there are some sides of Jonas’s Ethical position, but there are some responses to his position that are also ethical like survival, as I have mentioned before. Schlegel talks more about nature in the aesthetic fashion and I think that some of the points from his position are relevant in that without nature we wouldn’t be able to live the lives we live. His aesthetic position is implying that we should leave nature alone so it can continue to brighten up our days and continue to allow us to live happy, healthy lives. I also disagree with Hegel’s “Scientific” view of nature since he talks about the animal organism as a simple being when in all reality the animal organism while we may think we can understand all of it is something that is still unknown and mysterious. He also describes the idea of the living organism as “the manifested unity of the concept with its reality” (Hegel, 1990, 5) while I can understand the scientific point he is trying to make here I still disagree with it. His overall descriptions of Geological Nature, Vegetable Nature, and The Animal Organism are all very detailed and make sense they still have things that can be disagreed upon. Such as when he speaks
Henry Beston in Night on the Great Beach explains how we have destroyed some of the best parts of nature. We really don't appreciate the little things of nature. He goes in to great detail on how we have ruined night and continues to describe the little aspects of nature that we miss. Beston see nature as something that we don't respect anymore, but he has great love for it. It says to me that I don't appreciate nature. I never sit back and just enjoy it.
As a child, I unraveled nature’s beauty and existence. Each new experience brought me feelings of excitement and joy, sparkling my imagination and igniting my curiosity. It all seemed so large back then. Oceans appeared endless as they reached towards the horizon. Treetops seemed to make friends with the puffy-looking clouds as they soared to the sky. Over the years however, as I have grown older and life has become more complex, I am beginning to think less and less about the natural world around me. I glimpse sunset stuck in rush-hour traffic trying to return school after debate practices and only listen to the pitter-patter of the rain when there’s a storm outside. Forests and oceans seemed less appealing as they became intertwined with the urban development. In a way, I was becoming more and more distanced from the so-called nature. So, with an overwhelming desire for adventure and to escape the masses, my family and I drove to Big Bend National Park in Southwest Texas last summer.
But do we need to experience nature to what Barbara Kingsolver expects? Do we experience it in the same way she did? Some perceive nature as a need and use it to their advantage; mostly ignoring its beauty and wonders it has to offer. Some however, mostly in the older ages, saw nature the way Barbara Kingsolver sees it. They see it as beautiful and want to take in as much of its beauty and wonder it has to offer. Both sides however, initially want something from the wilderness that we live
“No human being could have passed a happier childhood than myself. My parents were possessed by the very spirit of kindness and indulgence. We felt that they were not the tyrants to rule our lot according to their caprice, but the agents and creators of all the many delights which we enjoyed. When I mingled with other families I distinctly discerned how peculiarly fortunate my lot was, and gratitude assisted the development of filial love.”
‘The sheer popularity’ of stimulating nature or using nature as ad space ‘demands that we acknowledge, even respect, their cultural importance,’ suggests Richtel. Culturally important, yes. But the logical extension of synthetic nature is the irrelevance of ‘true’ nature— the certainty that it’s not even worth looking at. (Louv lines 9-19)
He personifies nature as a human being by giving him the ability to hug and give warmth to others. He also says that people should have no worries in him because the beauty of nature is not the temporary happiness of sadness that life brings you, but the ability to breathe in air. The ability to stand up and walk. Nature has the ability to bring the best out of the worst. The narrator also says that people can truly see nature when they are isolated from society due to the fact that they can think take their time to analyze
“Could it be that we are supposed to be talking to the plants and animals, interacting with them, accepting the gifts they offer, and using them in ways that further their growth?”(Starhawk, 162). I feel this quote from “Our Place in Nature” is a great way to start the topic of how artists uses plant life in their work. It shows how artists might try to interact with the environment for ideas on the works that they come up. I feel also that they are trying to be one with the environment. I feel if you spend enough time in nature, you will build a strong connection with everything around you. This comment is justified when Starhawk said, “I can walk into any forest where the trees are strange and understand something about the relationships
Throughout today’s society there are several different cultural perspectives which form theoretical and practical understandings of natural environments, creating various human-nature relationship types. In this essay, I will describe and evaluate different ways of knowing nature and the impact of these views on human-nature relationships. From this, I will then explore my own human-nature relationship and reflect on how my personal experiences, beliefs and values has led me to this view, whilst highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each and reflecting upon Martin’s (1996) continuum.
The world has several great poets and many mind-blowing works, each with its own way of portraying its own message and some the same ones. Jane Flanders wrote the poem named “Cloud Painter” she shows the world from an artistic way, using a painter and his canvas to help the reader picture the true meaning behind the words and images created. Robert Frost takes on the same idea but uses a less complex example so that it makes his work easy to understand while not revealing the real meaning of the poem. Frost and Flanders are just two of the many poets that use nature as a way of explaining the very lessons in life. Each poet has a different way of presenting similar images but from a different perspective.
Sabarish, your experiences and views of nature have drastically changed my outlook on the way humans observe and interact with nature. As you stated in your snow example, I never looked at snow or other spectacles of nature that could cause a burden for me through positivity. However, whenever I visit alluring scenes such as the Grand Canyon, I am transported into a world of tranquility and sublimity. Both of these polarized examples provide the way that humans, or at least I, judge the connotation of nature; if nature just exists around me without disturbing me, I view it as positive. Nevertheless, if nature disturbs the peace or hurts anyone, I view it as negative. This exact viewpoint depicts the tendency of humans to think of themselves
The beautiful blossoms that bloom in Californian spring, the summer daisies alongside the cooling lake, long after the summer the trees have lost their leaves entering autumn to fresh white snow out in the mountains. Nature is able to show us its true beauty without any falseness and modifications. After all, is it not ironic how people go to museums to look at paintings of colorful flowers, green hills, and clear water streams; those are beauties that can easily be observed in real life outside of the urban environment which are surrounded by them, or how people buy recordings of the calming sounds of nature, similar to what you would listen to at night in the woods or smell nature aromas of the candles. What we are doing is trying to mislead our minds and pretend to think that we are in the woods but are instead cornered inside our small, well-furnished, and full -with-technology apartment.
The beauty and wonders of nature are inexplicably alluring. In the nonfiction essay “Down The River”, Edward Abbey successfully conveys this attitude in his description of his time in the Aravaipa Canyon. By observing his surroundings and comparing nature to human life, Abbey expresses a peaceful admiration, blended with a mystical attitude and respect toward nature. Abbey’s awe and fascination for nature is prominent throughout his essay. For him, nature can never fully be understood, and man will never be able to comprehend the complexity of the universe. Abby's attitude toward nature is one of peacefulness and respect, made evident by his constant admiration and appreciation towards it.
The people nowadays also abuse on what nature can provide to them. People are influenced by the western Culture, Man is more powerful and can have dominion over nature and that nature as they see become merely an instrument to satisfy human needs and wants. This kind of thinking or we can say attitude towards nature is called the “Anthropocentric Attitude”. Man reduce the value of nature as it is and it’s important because nature has made all things specifically for the sake of man and that the value of non-human things in nature is merely instrumental. An opposite thinking would be the Eastern Culture, for they value nature very well and they treat nature being one with them. This thinking or attitude is known as “Ecocentric
Phrases such as “botanising in glorious freedom [...] wandering through innumerable tamarac and arbor-vitae swamps, and forests [...], rejoicing in their bound wealth and strength and beauty, climbing the trees, revelling in their flowers and fruit [...], glorying in the fresh cool beauty and charm of the bog [...] displayed in boundless profusion”, “rarest and most beautiful”, and “I was able to wander many a long wild fertile mile in the forests and bogs, free as the winds, gathering plants, and glorying in God's abounding inexhaustible spiritual beauty bread”, all show how Muir felt about nature and what nature meant to him. A key phrase that shows Muir’s attitude towards nature states, “Storms, thunderclouds, winds in the woods—were welcomed as friends”. These phrases, as well as the words mentioned above, are extremely positive and show the utmost joy Muir found in his surroundings. The long and detailed descriptions of Muir’s surroundings helps to reinforce his joy in nature. The words that Muir uses to describe nature shows that he is close to nature and feels a connection with it. These positive words also show how absolutely stunning Muir finds nature and how he finds peace and joy in the wild. All of this is also supported by one of Muir’s
Nature has always been viewed as beautiful and harmless. Flowers, trees, and even other things like the sky always make nature seem like it is the most fertile and gorgeous thing that God created. Nature also has many symbolic and metaphorical references to real life objects, places, and people. However, in the short story “Young Goodman Brown,” nature can be seen negatively affecting the characters. The story has many scenes of despair and discomfort when the natural world affects the characters well being. Human nature also comes into effect in this story, with actions being decided on the nature of the human. From the Satan ceremony being one of the most descriptive sections in the story, to the forest being yet