Shoemaker Case Summary

The marriage between the two parties involved (Richard S. Dougall and Myrna R. Dougall) was dissolved in 2008 with the dissolution decree ordering Richard to pay Myrna $750 per month in spousal maintenance. Each of the two parties was also awarded one half interest in two parcels of property. Richard was ordered by the court to obtain appraisals and pay a fair share of the equity (as designated by the court’s property division assessment) to Myrna. In 2011, the court entered two judgments against Richard for failing to comply with obligations set down in the court order. A $5,000 judgment represented Myrna’s interest in one of the properties. The second judgment for $4,745 represented spousal maintenance arrearages. The court also reduced Richard’s spousal maintenance obligation to $500 per month effective August 2011.

Christopher Lambesis (Father) and Erin Lambesis (Mother) were divorced in 2013. In the divorce decree, Father was ordered to pay Mother $100 per month for child support for the two minor children. In October 2014, Father filed a Petition to Modify Child Support. Based on his own calculations using the Parent’s Worksheet for Child Support, he requested Mother pay him $100 per month. Mother requested a hearing in response including her own calculations indicating that Father should be paying her $123 per month. An evidentiary hearing was held and the court ordered Father to pay mother child support amounting to $149.30 per month. Father filed a Motion for a New Trial stating that he was not provided with documentation regarding Mother’s financial status in a timely manner and that the family court’s child support obligation calculations were incorrect. Mother filed an Application for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. The court denied Father’s request for a new trial and granted Mother’s request for attorney fees. Father filed a motion to reconsider the allocation of parenting time coordinator’s fees. This motion was also denied. Father appealed the court’s decision.

The court reconvened, and the crown called the next person, Tim. B. Tim, a young white male, was already out on bail pending his charge of assaulting his ex-girlfriend. The Crown stated that this was a reverse-onus because he was charged with failure to appear three times. The duty counsel informed that Tim voluntarily turned himself in earlier in the morning when he found out about the charges, and that his father who owned property over $250,000 is willing to be his surety. The crown said she will consent to the release with a $1000 surety and conditions of non-contact with the victim and to reside with or residence approved by the surety. The duty counsel did not object and the Judge accepted the terms.

Evidence of his wife’s adultery was presented at trial and the husband was granted a divorce on that ground by the trial court. Derby v. Derby, 378 S.E. 2d 74 (Va. Ct. App. 1989) The trial court also held that the separation agreement was invalid due to terms of unconscionability and constructive fraud or duress. Derby v. Derby, 378 S.E. 2d

Agreement was granting him the “Exclusive” right to vacation with the children and preference in odds years (2015 being the odd year). Moreover, the father did not know if his proposed order or this of the opposing counsel would be signed by the honorable Judge Bernstein when he left to Orlando with the children. Nevertheless, the order was signed in December 21, 2015 and was not entered in the system until December 24, 2015. Subsequent to this signing, the father was never served with the order. The Father left to Orlando Florida on December 27, 2015 and, by that time, he had not been served with the signed order of the Honorable Judge Bernstein. Neither the Court System nor the Mother’s attorney serve the father with the court order and

So was the ruling of Wayne County Municipal Judge Timothy VanSickle, who presided over a brief hearing held Tuesday. Absent from the hearing was Laurie Patterson, who as a consequence of ongoing court matters, stemming from a multiple property maintenance violations and was slated for demolition, was committed on July 5.

Mr. Moran’s pre-marital agreement with Ms. Moran is enforceable under Oregon law because Ms. Moran voluntarily entered into the premarital agreement and because the agreement was not unconscionable when it was executed. In Oregon, a premarital agreement can only be rendered non-enforceable if the party seeking to do away with the agreement is able to prove that they had not voluntarily entered into the agreement or that the agreement had been unconscionable at the time it was signed. 11 O.R.S. § 108.725 (2015). In the case at hand, neither of these requirements has been met, and thus the lower court’s judgement for Ms. Moran should be reversed and judgement rendered for Mr. Moran.

Lee County DHR’s testimony revealed that the case with the non-custodial parent (NCP), Felton Harley, Jr., begin back in 1992 when the custodial parent(CP), Wanda Marshall, applied for services to establish a paternity order, income withholding (IWO), and medical. An order was established and the NCP was paying child support. On July 9, 2008, the CP requested enforcement; DHR filed contempt against the NCP because he had not paid a child support payment since April 2008. The NCP appeared in court and paid $400.00; the court dismissed the review because an IWO had been mailed and the payments were being received through the IWO. On November 5, 2010, a contempt action was filed again, due to the NCP not paying child support since August 2010.

. The husband of the plaintiff file a petition to the court that his wife[plaintiff] is mentally ill and needs to have a court order directing the admission of her to the mental health hospital. The petition initiated by plaintiff’s husband is the order of the Wayne County probate court, and it is also appropriately certified by Doctors Wolodzko, who after appearing in her house and introducing himself as a doctor , and have a conversation with her in person that day and another day in telephone, determine that she is suffering from paranoid schizophrenia and Smyk. The court gave the order and the Plaintiff was taken by ambulance from her home to a private psychiatric

2. What’s does my client getting a divorce from Mr. Parker have to do with her murdering Mr. Parker?

We designed the Apollo Shoes audit case to introduce students to the entire audit process, from planning the engagement to drafting the final report. Students are asked to assume the role of a veteran of two-to-three “busy” seasons, “in-charging” for the first time. Communication between the students and client personnel and other firm members takes the form of e-mail messages from the engagement partner (Arnold Anderson), the engagement manager (Darlene Wardlaw), an intern (Bradley

Great pressure from suppliers and competitors caused some deterioration of basic performance for AGI during 2004–2006. Two main problems are

1) Can she ask the court to order the parties to mediation if Jack refuses to go? If so, under what circumstances will the court do so?

Solectron Corporation is but another classic case of a company that benefited immensely from the dot.com boom, only to experience the pains of the bust as the dot.com companies went down in the early 2000s. From its humble beginnings in Milpitas, CA as a solar energy products manufacturer, Solectron grew to be a highly successful global supply chain integrator with revenues of $18.6 billion by 2001. From the time it was founded in 1977 through 2000, the company grew in leaps and bounds mainly through lateral acquisitions.

The movie The Field of Lost Shoes, purely based off of the Battle of New Market, is both accurate and inaccurate when displaying soldiers’ lifestyle and their experiences that occurred during the Civil War. The movie is inaccurate in a way that is portrays soldiers having to leave their jobs, when they really did have jobs they had to leave. The movie is accurate in most scenes. Its accuracy proves to be correct in the scenes that women had to step in as nurses and help the wounded, soldiers leaving their loved ones, the horrible conditions that the soldiers had to fight through, and when groups of stable soldiers went to the field’s aftermath to rescue wounded soldiers and their loved ones. Overall, the movie is consistently accurate all the way through to show how the Civil War impacted the American lifestyle.