Within the following essay, one shall discuss all the circumstances in which it is always permissible to have an abortion, and that a detelogical pro-life standing on abortion, which would consider it not permissible in any circumstances and so wish to avoid permitting abortion in any circumstance, is ultimately wrong. The following essay will be split into two parts, the first will discuss Second order reasons for abortion and the second will discuss First Order reasons. First order reasons are reasons for abortion, which are easily justifiable, such as rape and medical complications which are mostly accepted by the deontelogical standing, whereas Second order reasons are, in comparison, less easy to justify, such as socioeconomic reasons …show more content…
First we shall address the economic impact, consider a Woman who just lost their job and are still a student, they struggle to pay rent for themselves and so to add the strain of looking after a child is unrealistic. For a consequentialist it is obvious that this Woman needs an abortion and so should be allowed one. The pro-life response to the consequentialist would be that the Woman deserves the lesson that actions have consequences and to allow the termination of a human life over a mistake would be morally wrong. However, one must question if making a mistake is justification for potentially ruining someone 's life. There is no doubt that less well-off households are harder to live in, even with government help. Thus, in this situation the pro-life argument condemns not only the Woman but their child, who is unquestionably innocent in their mistake. Thus showing that abortion is permissible in a situation of economic difficulty because it is not fair on either the Woman or the child.
Next we shall address the social impact. Consider that the Woman in want of the abortion does not want the child which would result, and so for a consequentialist it would be important to consider the impact on the child this reality would have. There is the possibility of a loveless upbringing, and so to force the Woman to have the child is cruel towards the child specifically because they could be damaged and so the abortion
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysGet Access
The abortion question raises a number of issues that form the core of the abortion debate. Opponents and supporters of abortions have been battling over this particular problem for decades and still cannot come to an agreement. Being one of the most common and most controversial medical procedures, abortion tends to affect people on psychological and sociological levels. But while the discussion of the morality of abortion is an ongoing debate, the social issues surrounding abortion in most cases stay unnoticed. The social aspect of the issue is centered on the abortion policy. The main question of the abortion policy is whether the law should permit abortions and, if so under what circumstances. The other is whether the law should put the life of an unborn child first and legally protect it. The peculiarity of the abortion policy is that its measures are highly dependent on different public opinions.
There are many limitations valued when it comes to the right of abortion. The news media still outlines the pros and cons of anti-abortion rights in certain-states-to soon, the entire country. My perspectives on the issue of abortion have been entitled from it to never be banned among citizen’s rights. The reproduction of pregnancy has been emphasized heavily on a mother’s decision to abort their child, but the father of the child plays an active role since he considers to that particular title. Through this current issue, majority of the people against abortion do not seem to have an open mind to how much it primarily affects the decision of the mother amongst her own views of considering abortion.
Ethical justification of abortion is a controversial subject consisting of numerous significant theories that have been presented based on studies and researches. Basically, abortion refers to termination of pregnancy through removal of the undeveloped fetus. Seemingly, the act is highly condemned by majority sociologists and health practitioners due to violation of humanitarian ethics and morals. However, this particular perspective is orientated by the normative ethics system entailing utilitarianism versus deontology. Alternatively, this excerpt shall focus on analyzing the social altercations of abortion based on views and opinions presented by two influential individuals, namely Marquis and Steinbock. By identifying the main arguments and key elements apparent in the two arguments, the study is likely to derive rational insight concerning moral permissibility of abortion.
Social issues that are discussed in the issue of abortion are the effects of abortion on society and the ideas of social justice and equality. Supporters of abortion claim that a ban on abortion has serious negative effects on the poor. More than two hundred thousand women die annually in developing nations as a result of illegal abortions because they could not afford or access abortion services. Furthermore, if woman delivers the child because she did not have access to services that terminated her unwanted pregnancy, that child may be abandoned, which poses more problems for children and society. To counter this, abortion advocates proposed that every woman, regardless of status, should have equal access to basic services. Restrictions of abortion deny poor, less-educated women equal access to these facilities, which increases their risk of performing illegal abortions or having unwanted children that they cannot provide for
In this paper I will discus and examine Judith Jarvis Thomson’s view upon abortion as stated in her argument “A Defense of Abortion”. I will explain her view on the issue and look deeper into her supporting arguments she included in her essay. I will also explain whether I agree with her statements. I would also discuss whether the person can agree with my statements and reason why having an abortion make you in moral.
Abortion is a purposeful end of pregnancy by evacuating the developing life. Many people assume abortion is a sin act toward innocent and defenseless fetus. There is a pro-choice group arguing by saying that abortion is not really a sin act since a fetus is at its synthesis of life. In the article “abortion should not be restricted “by Diana Brown and “Law that prohibit late-term abortion put mother at risk” by Stuart Taylor. These both article argues that abortion as a consequence of mother’s hardship in life, so effort should go into preventing the cause of abortion than blocking the practice. On the other hand, a pro-life groups are arguing by saying abortion is immoral acts. It should be prohibited for any reasons. The article
If all the following conclusions are acceptable then the conclusion of abortion being morally wrong is accepted. Each of these premises will be defended throughout this paper.
The status of abortion is one that will always be argued amongst the pro-life community and the pro-choice community. Abortion is the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, most often performed during the first 28 weeks. (Dictionary) Jane and John are two accomplished individuals who put their careers ahead of having children. When Jane became pregnant they discovered that the baby had Down syndrome (Down syndrome is a genetic disorder that causes lifelong mental retardation, developmental delays and other problems. Down syndrome varies in severity, so developmental problems range from moderate to serious.) (Staff) They did not want have a disabled child, so they decide to abort. In this essay I will argue that it is morally wrong for Jane to have an abortion. Firstly I will present the “extreme” conservative argument to support my view, secondly I will consider one objection to my argument and finally I will provide a response to the objection.
Abortion is a medical process when a pregnancy is ended and it does not result in the birth of a child. Since the court of Roe v. Wade in 1973, the United States legalized the process of abortion. Yet, even after millions of abortions in the US, the debate on the topic of abortion rises still over decades of time. Two groups are presented: those who are in favor of abortion, who are called pro-choice, and those who are against it, pro-life. Although the pro-life states the immorality and valid reasonings to argue about it’s side, there are still many factors that one must remember. The life of the mother, the economic status of the child, and the future of the unborn child against the society should be considered to argue that abortion should remain legal.
Those who choose the side of pro-life position against abortion choose to criminalize this subject rather than treating the life of the fetus. Though people who are prolife state that a fetus is life, their main objective is in criminalized abortion rather than choice. According to (Smith, 373) this is not the claim that the fetus is a life, but the conclusion it draws from the assertion: that because the fetus is a life, abortion should be criminalized. Even though the criminal justice fails to solve our social problems, we choose the criminal justice to solve the debate of abortion. Choosing to punish abortion with prison time, will only aim to a marginalized group of people who are of color and poverty. For example, women of color are more likely to be arrested and imprisoned for drug use because as a result of a greater rates of poverty in communities of color, they are more likely to be in contact with government agencies where their drug use can be detected (Smith, 374). This concept can also be applied to the illegalization of abortion. White pregnant women are slightly more likely to engage in substance abuse, but not often sentenced. This pushes a marginalized group away from seeking healthcare because of the fear of being reported to the authorities. The issue seems to be that we as a society choose to always use the criminal approach rather than looking at the social issues we have. Those of pro-choice offer that women should be able to make their own decision of their reproductive lives. Rather than a pro-choice paradigm, it could be considered a free choice, but does not take into account of the overall perspective of social, economic and political factors. The choice of free will and opportunities is not equal in the spectrum of social classes we hold in a capitalist society. Though prochoice
The pros of abortion can be considered only if you been rape or if the ladies who is pregnant has a high-risk pregnancy or if the ladies are having a teenage pregnancy. Rape is horrible but abortion can be so helpful to these ladies because the mothers have the right to get an abortion since they went through rape and a tough time in their lives. Not only are the lady’s victims but so are the baby because there not a punishment to their mothers. The pros of getting an abortion due to rape can help these ladies and but, this awful memory behind them and get to move on with their life’s. Many people agree that is only right to get an abortion if ladies get rape so they can avoid the trauma they got while getting rape so they can have faster recovery time. If they don’t get an abortion there just going to live with the trauma and it can affect the baby’s life and the mother life and their whole family.” A baby should not come into this world unwanted” (Abortion Pro Con). Meaning in the article that a child is a big decision that comes with big responsibilities but also stating it’s oaky to
The pro-choice camp believes the providence of choice to abort is vital for gender equality. As Thomson (1971) believes, one’s body belongs to oneself which it is morally permissible for a woman to make her own choice towards her unexpected pregnancy. Furthermore, compared to men, women may be more affected by pregnancy which it might disrupt their education, career or family life. Hence, pregnancy to a woman could be an important issue due to its impact. Therefore, illegalizing abortion may be seen as a constraint of women’s right to freedom of choice when abortion could be such an important issue to them. Also, it could be seen as a limitation to their bodily integrity and the right to control their fertility when the choice of termination
So far, all we have talked about really is the emotion of the question of abortion. The purpose of this essay (which will not be very long), is to examine these lines of reasoning, and to come to some conclusion about the differing philosophies of these two characters.
A common debate in the world today involves abortion, the deliberate end of human pregnancy, and whether or not it should be legalized. “Every year in the world there are an estimated 40-50 million abortions. This corresponds to approximately 125,000 abortions per day” (“Abortions Worldwide this Year”). On one side of the argument, people are not disturbed by this grotesque number, and on the other side there are people outraged and simply appalled. Although people attempt to deem abortion acceptable in society because of circumstances like the mother not being able to support the child or in instances of rape, it is still morally wrong.
A good environment for a child to strive, learn, and live in is one of the most important factors in the development of one’s life. If a child grows up in a household where one is not wanted or taken care of, negative outcomes will appear later on in their lifetime. A child who grows up in a bad environment can cause many social problems such as death, drug abuse, and violence. If a parent cannot raise a child under the correct circumstances, it is best to get an abortion. However, either due to the illegality of abortion, or the high-cost of having an abortion, many children are born into environments that aren’t stable enough to correctly develop in. This causes more harm to society, the child, and the parents, thus there needs to be an increase in access to abortions. When there are no access to abortions, illegal abortions occur, which are usually unsafe and risky. How can one tell a woman what they can and can 't do with their own child? Now, there are repercussions from illegal abortions that affect society negatively, as “Each year, an estimated five million women are hospitalized for the treatment of abortion complications, at a cost of at least $460 million,” let 's say, if abortion was more easily accessible, legal for more women, and costs were reduced, this money could be better spent in other areas. (Cohen). Unsafe abortions occur all over the world, and are caused by either cost issues or the laws preventing women from receiving an abortion, which is life