Even though Some parents or schools might not have enough money, they can just take it from the government. School is just like work so children should get paid for good grades because getting paid will make children want to go to school and they will like going. School is usually boring to most kids and they need something to look forward to, and Children deserve more than just a grade in the gradebook. If children get paid for good grades, it will make them want to come to school everyday and get all of their work done. According to Debate.org, if children are paid for better grades, they will want to do better in school. They don't have to pay children for D's and F's, this is rewards for good grades, not just for being at school. All children are smart in their own way and they all deserve to …show more content…
No, not really because they will probably get a job when they are 16 and older, and they don't want that money anymore because they might make more with their job. According to Ally, once you start paying your children for good grades, how long will you keep paying them, the world may never know. After all, this practice can get expensive after a while. Plus, if you stop paying them, will their grades fall? Adds Kiplinger, “If you go the ‘paycheck’ route, you have to keep raising the stakes – and once kids are old enough to earn their own money, you lose leverage.” Their grades probably won't fall because they should be smart now because while they were getting paid they paid attention more in class and knew how to do everything that they were suppose to be learning. If everyone tries their hardest in school they will all have good grades and everyone will get paid. Some children don't try in school and that's why they aren't getting good grades. If they try and their school decides to start paying for good grades they everything will be
Everyone does their job. Construction workers construct, teachers teach, and judges judge. Students learn. And if everyone works- whether it be in an office or in a school- why not pay students? Well, that's actually a bad idea. Paying students for their grades like you pay an employee is a bad idea in the long run.
First off, school requires a mental effort which by definition is considered to be work. Since we go to school for 8 hours every day and do that about 180 days per year, we should get paid if we keep our grades up because it’s hard to do. Keeping good grades requires lots of hard work and effort. It also requires time, which some of us
If kids do get paid they will like to learn more, they think going to school is a waste of time but when they do get paid they won´t think that anymore. kids don’t like school is because they think they don’t get anything out of it so if we do pay them they will work harder. In my opinion i
Some families are not lucky enough to have a good meal a day, enough money to buy new clothes, or even some books to learn with. If students are worrying about their family and their meals for the day, they won't be able to focus on school work. If money and education are incorporated, it could get them to a better future. Education leads to a good job and a good job leads to a good amount of money. If the money is given to provide the education, it helps the family look for a better future.
There are major flaws in the argument for attempting to pay students for obtaining exceptional grades. One of the flaws is the fact that the money used for the payment of the pupils is coming from their parents. With this policy, the parents will be required to pay additional taxes to account for the need for money within the school district. Many individuals who are for this practice argue that the money is going straight back to the families. Although this is true, the money is going to the children not the parents. Many students are not going to provide the money to their parent, but instead use it for their own wants or needs.
Giving your children money for satisfying grades that they get doesn't benefit them with their career that they will have as adults. Let me back this up. If they get paid for the super grades that they received they will soon have an expectation that everything good that they do they should receive something in return. This makes kids not try to the best of their ability because these children know
Although she has many good points, I disagree. Students should not get paid to have good grades and to stay in school. I do believe that students should get good grades and stay in school, but should not receive payment for something most students are already forced to do. Let's face it, what student, on the brink of dropping out, is going to stay in school just to earn ten measly dollars. Some say only students who acquire good grades should receive payment. So with that taken into account, there are many questions that need to be asked, such as what grade point average is considered to be good, how much will students be getting paid for this certain grade point average, how will students get paid, cash, check, debit card, lunch money, and the list just continues on. A study conducted by Harvard Crimson showed that although when students were provided financial incentives to score well on tests, the students being paid actually did not do any better than the students
Would students be able to improve their grades if they were getting paid? Money is a great reward for most students and it could possibly have a long term effect on students. They are always wanting their grades to be improved and then they would have more of a reason to study for test and quizzes if they were getting paid do go to school. Students would be focused at school if their was money to be made by going to school. Teachers would also not be stopping as often because of students getting of track. I believe students would improve their grades if they were getting paid because, Money could have a long term effect, and more student could need a little more motivation
In the article, “Why You Shouldn’t Pay Children for Grades,” Amy McCready details her argument against children receiving money as a reward for good grades. Her main point is expressed in her article as a sentence: “But no matter how much we want it to, money can’t buy smarts, motivation, or school success.” She is expressing her idea that paying kids will not genuinely help them. Within the article, McCready expresses her dislike of parents using payment to attempt to encourage student achievement. Her points include her belief that paying children won’t maintain high grades because kids lose interest and excitement over time. She also believes that payment for grades creates a negative attitude within the children and invoke a sense of entitlement.
One time, I got a good grade and my grandma gave me money. If school is truly wants student to be motivated to do well in the school should pay student for a better grade. Motivate student prepares them for high school higher test score. From better graduation rates for learning about work making kids smarter there are many positive effects of paying student for a higher grade.
“Why can’t our hard work have an income?”. Almost all students have had a similar thought at a time in their lives. To them, the incessant striving and vassalage they do for school deserves a salary. However, the situation with the exchange of grades for payment is a problematic state of affairs. In the predicament of schools giving students this opportunity, it will certainly lead to catastrophic events for all parties involved, especially, in the long run. Insightful to the statistics and evidence of both standpoints, school payment for grades is a situation best abstained because it causes quagmires. In agreement with this, say it causes conflicts, it’s only short-term, and causes negative impacts in the long run. By not paying students, you avoid turmoil, cut out a short-term motivator, and allow their future selves a better chance academically.
More than half of the students in any school show they learn more and understand more when doing an activity that involves moving around. Students getting paid is like and activity, they will learn more because they are working for something every month. A school in Massachusetts has started paying kids to work and learn and when they have testing, studies show their scores go up. Being paid isn't a big reward but when you're in high school you might need a car, or your parents might tell you to pay for your own things like clothes, so you will need a little money. It has its advantages and disadvantages but paying students will help kids have a better education and have a better experience at school and have a brighter future.
To begin with, students should not be paid for exceptional grades, as a result it robs their feeling of accomplishment. According to “Parents paying their children money for excellent grades is a horrible idea”, by Gisler and Eberts, “ Many parents don’t realize that giving money to children for grades robs their feeling of accomplishment.” This means, giving children money they only do their work if they’re getting paid, and they don’t learn as much. The effect of this is that they don’t get that feeling of them doing their work all by themselves with nothing supporting
It was shown that promising kids that they will get paid in exchange for higher grades or attendance led to increased less effort in school. The ability to learn was actually a failure, it had little direct impact on the kids. I intend to use this article as a outline for should students get paid for good grades.
Where are they going to get the money for a moped or their first cell phone? How will they not have to go to college knowing they will be in thousands of dollars in debt? I believe kids should be paid for good grades because it will motivate them to get good grades, it will help poorer children to pay for college, and it will teach them them what it is like in the real world where you get paid for doing good. It will give people with less money a chance to go to college or help their families financially. If you gave kids money for good grades more kids would have the money to pay for college.