This paragraph will begin the evaluation of the quote by first considering the classical research and explanations for moral development, with theories such as that of Kohlberg, Bandura and Freud being discussed. Perhaps the most controversial of the classical theories comes from Sigmund Freud, who proposed the existence of hostility between the needs of society versus the needs of the individual. It follows that moral development can only proceed once the individual’s selfish desires are repressed and substituted by the values of important ‘socialization agents’. Thus, Freud explains that between the ages of 3-6 years, a child first faces the development of the Oedipus complex (Freud, 1910) and the moral development can only take place …show more content…
…………. However, when we look at Kohlberg’s research from a differential perspective, it is limited in terms of its’ generalisability. Although it was claimed that the six stages were universal, they in fact show a cultural bias. Research such as that of Snarey and Keljo found that the ‘post-conventional’ level or moral understanding tends to mainly occur in more developed and industrialised societies, suggesting that moral development may differ from culture to culture (Snarey & Keljo, 1991). In relation to the quote, this may in fact support the idea that we are empty vessels who are moulded by moral values as it implies that our morals can differ from culture to culture, thus meaning our morals are not universally innate. Further classical research that can be discussed relates to the social learning theory of aggression. Bandura’s social learning theory (SLT) can be used to discuss the development of morals, however this differs to the previously discussed theories as it draws upon social psychology more than developmental. The SLT explains that children learn by observing and imitating others. (Bandura & Walters, 1963). Throughout Bandura’s classic Bobo Doll study into aggression, children can be observed to copy the aggression of the adults after seeing them rewarded for it, showing the importance of vicarious learning and imitation (Bandura, Ross & Ross, 1961). Although
The article See Aggression...Do Aggression discusses aggression, which is the biggest social problem facing America and the entire world. The article delves deeper into the question of why people are aggressive. Psychologists have theoreticized that aggression may stem from genetics or pent up frustration, but the most common and accepted is the theory that aggression is learned. This final reason for aggression is what prompted Bandera, a founder of the “social learning theory” and his team, Dorothea and Sheila Ross, to conduct “the Bobo doll study.”
The fundamentals of the social learning theory significantly describe offenders and their criminal behavior which is learned based on observation and imitation. A researcher by the name of Albert Bandura along with coworkers tested the social learning theory with several experiments on children and their imitation of aggression based on what they saw and were exposed to. Bandura’s focus was to prove that human behavior such as aggression is learned through social imitations and copying the actions of others. Walters (1966) gives details about the Bobo doll experiment and explains its purpose related to learning a violent behavior based on observation. In the experiment, the tested subjects were children of both sexes, ranging from the ages of three to six years. Some of the children were exposed to a non-aggressive adult, while the other children were placed in a room with an aggressive adult who would both physically and verbally attack the Bobo doll. The control group in the experiment was not exposed to any adult. During the second phase of the experiment, the children were left in a room by themselves with the toys, and watched to see if they would demonstrate the aggressive behavior like that of which they observed adults doing earlier. Walter (1966) describes the results as “children who had been exposed to an aggressive model showed more imitative physical and verbal
Lawrence Kohlberg was a well known psychologist best known for his thorough research into the development and better understanding of the processes needed to grow into a well developed human being. Kohlberg grew up in New York City on October 25, 1927. Growing up in such a diverse area is what struck his interest in the development of all beings. In only one short year he received his bachelors degree and then went on to devote his career to study the understanding of development for the youth. Kohlberg 's stages of moral development were very much influenced by his peer Jean Piaget. Jean Piaget also had a similar belief of a stage-based theory of development. While Piaget only had two
Kohlberg’s theory is related to how people develop a sense of what is right and wrong. It was influenced by the work of Jean Piaget, on moral reasoning. He classifies the stages into three levels each containing two sublevels. The first level is called the preconventional level of moral development. Children in this level experience the world in the terms of pain or pleasure. Something considered right in this stage would be what feels good to the child. The next level would be the conventional level. This occurs in the teen years where children start to think of right or wrong in terms of what pleases their parents or follows cultural norms. Children at this stage are also learning to assess intention when determining if a situation is right or wrong. “For example, they understand that stealing food to feed one’s hungry children is not the same as stealing an iPod to sell for pocket change.” (Macionis, Pg. 90) The final stage is the postconventional level. People being to consider abstract ethical principle and not just society’s norms.
Throughout this course, we have explored a vast amount of theories, however, Albert Bandura’s Social Learning Theory (SLT) has been the one that intrigued me the most. Bandura’s SLT “strongly emphasized the importance of observational learning and cognitive variables in explaining human behavior (Powell, Honey, & Symbaluk 2017).” According to our readings Bandura agrees with the behaviorist learning theories of classical and operant conditioning, he proposes that the SLT is a result of both person and situation, which does not have the same effect from either component on their own (Powell, Honey, & Symbaluk 2017). One of his most well-known studies involves a bobo doll. In which Bandura demonstrates that when someone observes violent behavior it increases the chances of violence of the spectator, and
Kohlberg’s response to Gilligan was to recognize the significance of distinguishing the concept of morality, which focuses on special relationships and obligations, but to deny that it was a distinct moral orientation. He saw it as an addition rather than alternative to justice solutions.
Human behaviors are learned emotion through interaction with each other. A child’s brain is like a sponge. It absorbs the behavior of its surroundings. Serial killer’s treatment and view of other people is a learned behavior through interaction with others in society. The Bobo doll experiment conducted by Albert Bandura in 1961-1963 at Stanford University shows how children’s behavior depends on adults that are around them. In the experiment, adults acted aggressively to the Bobo doll and the study was on how the children will react to it after they saw the adults’ interaction with the doll. Bandura conducted the experiment on two models where one of the models contained children exposed to the aggressive act performed by the adult on the Bobo doll. The other model contained children who saw adults act in a pleasant way to the doll. The result of this experiment showed that children exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to act physically aggressive than those who were not (McLeod). This study proved the social learning theory which basically states that children learn behaviors from
Rest, J. R. (1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
In 1961, psychologist Albert Bandura came up with the Social Learning Theory which stated that children learn social behavior, such as aggression, and alter their own through the process of observational learning- observing someone else’s behavior. To test this theory, he created the Bobo Doll Experiment. During this test, three groups of 24 children were places in different rooms with different environments. In one room, 24 children were exposed to non-aggressive behavior towards a bobo doll. In the second room, the children were exposed to aggressive behavior towards the doll. The third room served as the control group; The 24 children in that room were simply taught to ignore the doll. The results showed that the children who witnessed the violent behavior quickly picked up on it and began to act the same towards the doll. Those 24 children made more immitative aggressive responses than those in the non-aggressive and control groups (McLeod 2011). This famous experiement credits many psychologists who believe genetics has nothing to do with criminal
This essay will focus on two the environmental theories on why aggression may occur, social learning theory and de-individuation. In Social learning theory if the child sees an adult acting aggressively and being rewarded or just not being punished then that child may go on to think that acting aggressively is a good way to interact with other people. Bandura’s study(1961) found that children who were shown the adult acting aggressively towards to Bobo doll were more likely to act aggressively towards the doll themselves whereas none of the children who saw the adult acting kindly towards the doll acted aggressively towards it, instead they copied the nicer actions from what they’d seen the adult do, this is called vicarious reinforcement.
The development of morals values in a human life stems from the exposure and experience of varying degrees of those experiences in the life of a developing child. Popular theorists have wrestled and some won their arguments that, moral development is a social function, and therefore forms as a result of social condition. On the other hand, there is a strong argument from theorists such as Kohlberg that moral development is a mix component of psychological pre-disposition and the condition of a child?s life from the parent roots. Despite many harsh criticism of the Theory of Moral Development from Kohlberg, the stages of development he derived at have offered plausible explanations that moral development can be defined clearly a core function of nurturance. The way a child to acts or not act in any given situation determines whether
Kohlberg’s stages of moral development were based on a moral philosopher by the name of Lawrence Kohlberg. His main interest was to observe children during growth to develop and conclude which stages they best fit into. After observing both adults and children, he concluded that, “Human beings progress consecutively from one stage to the next in an invariant sequence” (“Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development”). All of the 6 stages he created, represent the morality in which a child or adult can be at; he created an age zone for each stage. There are a total of 6 stages but each main concept consists of 3 levels. Level 1 is the preconventional stage. This stage focuses on punishment/obedience and how the person decides to act due to the
The second level of moral development is the conventional moral reasoning; “Beginning in middle school, up to middle age – most people end up here” (“Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development.”). At this level,
Goldman Sachs should have been punished for its behavior in the years leading up to the financial crisis. Goldman ended up settling with the federal government for $110 Billion, which I do not believe was sufficient based on the magnitude of problems created. This amount should have been much larger, and at minimum they should have forfeited the $14 Billion paid to them by AIG. (Inside Job, 2011) In addition, AIG should have had the right to sue Goldman Sachs for fraud. It was in the public’s best interest to keep Goldman up and running, however additional penalties could have been put on a repayment schedule to keep them solvent. Instead, you had Goldman giving out large bonuses.
The theory of moral development, advanced by psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg is one of the most well-known persuasive theories in the field of cognitive science and stems from the work of Jean Piaget, which hypothesizes on the direct correlation that exists between moral and cognitive development. Kohlberg speaks of the appearance and understanding of what is right and wrong from childhood to adulthood and explains by this transition through the identification of various levels of morality known as pre-conventional, conventional and post conventional. People will make decisions based on the understanding of the possible outcome and through reasoning of morals. (Target Concept)