Full-time
MSc in Logistics & Supply Chain Management
2011/12
Freight Transport Assessment
SilicaChem Corporation:
Outbound Freight Transport Report
Jia GUO, Bethie
09/01/12
1. Introduction
This short report recommends the best options of serving the Spanish distributor and the North America customer based on information given. Although cost is the main consideration in the analysis, various other criteria such as service level and transport modal features are also examined. In order to deliver a more comprehensive discussion, weaknesses of the recommended modals are listed, which should be carefully evaluated when further information is available.
2. Serving the Spanish distributor
2.1
…show more content…
Another alternative the company could consider is using multiple carriers in intermodal transport. As illustrated in Appendix 1, the quotations of the same route or activity from two carriers can be significantly different. Therefore, it is beneficiary for the company to understand the cost components of carriers and the rationale behind the quotations, in order to grasp the opportunity of better deal and more reliable service (Jennings and Holcomb, 1996).
In terms of transport mode selection, SilicaChem could consider the feasibility of using only road and rail transport in intermodal so as to boost transit speed. However, further information concerning routing and cost are needed for detailed evaluation.
3. Serving the North America customer
3.1 Recommendation
As shown by the calculation in Appendix 2, sea freight is more cost effective than air freight. Based on the assumptions listed in the appendix, sea freight is estimated to have an annual total cost of about £264,000 lower than that of air freight. The main contributor of this difference is shipping cost, as the total annual shipping rate of sea freight is £310,000 cheaper. As a result, although adopting air freight would provide a saving of about £60,000 in inventory holding and warehousing costs, the total cost of sea freight is still substantially lower.
Apart from the cost factors, sea freight would also
As cargo costs vary with the freight moved they are calculated as a product of Cargo costs per ton, as stated above, and the capacity for each of the vessels, i.e. for Tashtego 1,43*3950 + 1,43*3150 = 10.153,00 and for the large vessel 1,43*6850 + 1,43*3150 = 14.300,00.
The excessive cost of travel for both the East and West Coast Boat Forces and
Such new moves by both “gorillas” like companies may sweep the corners of the market described by some industry analysts. For years, the industry set the prices without consideration of distance, which means, a same sized letter from New York to New Jersey has the same cost as if the letter is shipped to California from New York. In 1996, UPS officially moved to distance-based pricing, and Federal Express followed same action in 1997. There is no denying that what actions Airborne take is significant affecting the development of the company, while facing this big change in industry.
Expedient delivery of goods outweighed the cost differential. However, since intermodel transportation pricing is governed by fixed costs, such as terminal expenses, not fuel costs, shipping costs will remain higher in this area. Now, lower fuel costs will further help to increase the use of trucks, rather than rail for transportation. This type of shift has not been seen in the industry since 2010, but it appears the trend will continue for the foreseeable future.
Selecting an exceptional freight company for your specialized freight needs is an important business decision. After all, freight companies can be considered the backbone for any company that relies on logistics for its functioning.
To avoid the confusion and problems, the shipper should declare the value for the goods on the ocean bill of lading or to exercise the right to declare a higher value and pay higher freight charges. If the shipper wants the number of
Solely taking a look at the graph, to accommodate future demand for growth I would recommend ocean transportation to move our products from the new facility in China. As we expect demand to grow by 10 percent annually over the next five years, it will be most beneficial to utilize ocean transportation as projected total costs for air becomes higher than ocean above the trade off point of 1,904,761.9 POUNDS. For example, total projected costs were calculated to be at $587,156 for air versus $630,080 for ocean at the end of 5 years. Extrapolate the graph even further into the future, with the expectation of even more growth,
The intent of this analysis is to compare and contrast the cost structures for rail, motor carriers and air modes of transportation. Implicit in this analysis is the rapid adoption of intermodal transportation which is often optimized to specific logistics and supply chain objectives (Jennings, Holcomb, 1996).
Passenger and freight transportation systems have a number of similarities in the investment evaluation process, with a few significant differences. The table below offers an initial look at the stakeholders for each and their relative financial interests.
This essay attempts to describe current air freight market conditions, challenges in air freight demand and generate potential solutions to increase air cargo demand. It is divided into four parts: air freight, current demand for air freight, challenges, and potential
They result in the following environmental threats like greenhouse effect, acidification, over-fertilization and depletion of the ozone layer.
In conclusion it can be said the main drivers for cooperating through a PCS are increased efficiency by saving time and costs and the decreasing number of mistakes made as described by Burckhardt et al(1998) and Fenex and Syntens (2010). While the main disadvantage can be described as the high switching barrier for freight forwarders to adapt its current operations (with it is own software solutions) towards
The transportation and logistics industry is one of the key components of modern life. It provides the framework through which every raw material and finished consumer good is moved through the supply chain into the hands of consumers. This industry is generally taken for granted by consumers. When consumers do think about the industry it is thought of in terms of unchanging and stagnate transportation modes. This vision of the industry is not an accurate reflection of the reality of modern transportation industry. During the last several decades the technological innovations that have changed the face of modern life, have also had far reaching effects on the transportation industry. The pressures driving innovation in the industry
Using the right type of transport is very important in the supply chain. As we have learnt earlier the use of the transport mode is of strategic importance to stock holding decisions. Air transport is much quicker but the costs are high as opposed to shipping by boat or rail. Sea or rail transport requires having higher levels of inventory in-house to meet quick customer demands. Most importantly, customer service levels must be met, and this often determines the mode of transport used.
In fact, the organization can pick an assortment of method for transportation. In such manner, the decision ought to be grounded on requirements of the organization. For example, the organization working in the book distributing industry needs the supply of paper and mash materials alongside the supply of ink and different materials fundamental for book distributing. In such a circumstance, the organization ought to recognize successful methods for transportation in light of the fact that the transportation may expand expenses of creation considerably. For example, utilizing the air transportation for book distributing is irrational on the grounds that the expenses of such transportation are the most elevated, while the quick speed of transportation does not legitimize its expenses. Rather, the organization ought to concentrate on four key measurements: rail transport, inland water transport, sea transport, and air transport.