preview

Similarities Between Fahrenheit 451 And Captain Beatty

Decent Essays

"What traitors books can be! You think they’re backing you up, and then they turn on you. Others can use them, too, and there you are, lost in the middle of the moor, in a great welter of nouns and verbs and adjectives." (2.386) Unlike Charles Blow view on books, Captain Beatty’s passion for books are very different. Charles Blow is from a poor family, but loves to read. Captain Beatty is a fire captain and would love to burn all books no matter the genre. Books, to Charles, were his life. He evolved his education around reading books. While some differences between Charles Blow and Captain Beatty are evident, the similarities are salient. Mr.Blow comes from a background of poverty. He grew up not having very much, and having to get by …show more content…

Captain Beatty was the antagonist of Fahrenheit 451 , and told everyone that books had no benefit to you're life.Captain Beatty is a bit of paradox. He’s the head honcho fireman, but he knows more about books than anyone else.It’s not until Beatty gives Montag that big speech in Part One that we understand what’s going on in this guy's head. He used to be curious about books, just like Montag is. He used to question the system, just like Montag. And just like Montag, he took action – he read, rules be damned. So what in the world makes him different from Montag?Hold that thought for a paragraph or so. What makes Beatty such a powerful force in this novel is that, actually, he makes a decent point in his anti-book ravings. Literature is contradictory. It is confusing. It is treacherous, it will mix you up, it will force you to answer questions you never wanted to ask, and it will quite often pull the rug out from under your feet.But that’s one of the lessons of Fahrenheit 451. It’s not about what books say, it’s about the process of reading them and thinking for yourself. It’s about questioning. This, of course, is the reason books were abolished in the first place – not for the information they held, but for the dissent they caused amongst their readers. So Beatty is right to argue that books are contradictory. However he misses the point.

Get Access