Similarities Between Fahrenheit 451 And Hunger Games

The book Fahrenheit 451 has multiple connections to the real world. One significant similarity between the book and real life is their comparable societies. An example of this is how today’s society has become extremely technological. In Fahrenheit 451, humanity gives a lot of concern to technology in relation to other things. This is shown by how no one in the book gives much importance to communicating with others or building relationships like Mildred who cares more about her parlor family than her own husband. Also, people nowadays want everything faster. Faster internet connection, faster cars, faster computers, etc. No one wants to waste time; they want things done quicker and with little to no effort. This too relates to the people of

Fahrenheit 451 and The Hunger Games both fall under the Dystopian genre. This means that in both of the books, the setting takes in an imaginary place made up by the author. Most dystopian books also have a strong theme. The theme could be about something that’s contraband but people do it anyway, or just inhumane situations such as killing for pleasure and entertainment. Most dystopian books also have

While there are many comparable characters between the story and the film, the most prominent similarities are with Jon Anderton and Guy Montag. For example, both men had government jobs in the beginning that they both deemed was ‘respectable’, but in the end had betrayed to follow their own free will. In “Fahrenheit 451”, Guy’s wife Mildred had turned him in after an incident regarding her and her friends, while similarly in “Minority Report”, Jon’s ex-wife Lara had informed Burgess of Jon’s arrival in secret. Beatty and Lamar Burgess are also comparable, as they both were leaders of an association that was intended to prevent an action even though they both committed the crimes, and they both died at the hands of the protagonist.

In Ray Bradbury's mind he pictured what would have been today, with heartless people burning books, to the courageous, standing up for their beliefs .Within this novel and our society today, there are many similarities in culture. There are also many positive aspects as well as negatives, but they put many harmful threats to the two different point of views in our time, to when the book was published. I believe that in Ray Bradbury's book, Fahrenheit 451 technology, censorship, and knowledge have many similarities to today's world.

Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury, and Equilibrium, directed by Kurt Wimmer, have many similarities and differences, widely ranging from the characters personalities and traits, to the society that they live in. The protagonists, Guy Montag and John Preston, both live in corrupt, dystopian worlds, in which everyone is equal to each other in their society. For the case of Fahrenheit 451, Guy Montag is a fireman, who takes much pleasure in his work. In Equilibrium, John Preston, who is a Cleric, displays a higher rank in class than others, which is quite frankly, the opposite of equal, ironically, the title being: Equilibrium.

Our society is all about entertainment and government control. Everyday hours are wasted watching a screen. Every day the government makes more and more request to censor items on Google. In the novel Fahrenheit 451 Ray Bradbury warns future generations not to be trapped by entertainment and the government censorship. Look around; we are no different. This essay will state the similarities and differences between our societies. I believe that if we keep heading in this direction we will turn out to be like the Fahrenheit 451 society.

“If you have built castles in the air, your work need not be lost; that is where they should be. Now put foundations under them…” -Henry David Thoreau. This quote means that you can be a dreamer and have wondrous ambitions but that will all go to waste unless effort is put towards that ambition. I agree with this statement because people can have the most amazing goals but go no where without the required effort.

Mankind today has many sources predict that the future is likely headed into a world of tyranny, controlled by technology and secretive authorities playing us like marionettes. In the novels 1984 by George Orwell and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, it explains the stories of two middle aged men, Guy Montag and Winston Smith, who live in dystopian societies where stupidity is conventional and knowledge is a crime. Bradbury teaches his audience that books are extremely vital for knowledge, while Orwell shows how technology and the manipulation of perception can easily be used to brainwash others into believing almost anything. While the high forces attempt to hypnotize everyone, the heroes of the story share similar fates, escape it and realize that the controlling forces in their society are performing an eradication of intelligence and freedom in order to manipulate mankind and they make a stand to fight for the truth.

“You have to make choices even when there is nothing to choose from,” (Peter Zilahy) and these characters make choices that will change their lives forever. Guy Montag from Fahrenheit 451 and Truman Burbank from The Truman Show are living in drastically different dystopias and realize how imperfect their ‘perfect’ societies really are, so they do something about it. They have limits created by a higher power which leads them to think less about their choices; the problem is, their curiosity gets the better of them. Truman and Montag are living limited lives in their dystopian society.

The hunger games also are based in a futuristic society as applies to the book the Fahrenheit 451. The setting in the novel is one of complete disarray in the order of the society as is the case in the novel the Fahrenheit 451. The Hunger Games is a dystopian novel, but its content is far more political than any other novels written in the twenty-first century. The novel revolves around a young female teenager who is engaged in a young triangle with other two young men. The young men are Peeta Mellark and her best friend, Gale. The main idea, however, is the task that the young teenager, who happens to be the main character is faced with. Katniss Everdeen as is the name of the girl, is faced with the task of uniting her Falk in an uprising against the cruel system of administration which happens to be taking advantage of the other population (Dubrofsky

These values differ from that of the Capitol, which is exempt from the Hunger Games. It appears that their only purpose is to use the goods and services that the districts create and to do so unscrupulously (2008). The citizens of the

The Hunger Games, by Suzanne Collins illustrates a dystopian society where the government tries to apply a perfect society to maintain the power in all of Panem. The author shows an elaborate and horrifying description of a society not so unlike our own and provides a clear warning about the danger of governmental control. The government of Panem has a government which controls everything. The government shows totalitarianism, a post-apocalyptic setting, and the world ranks. These three main points are what shows how the The Hunger Games is a great example of a dystopian literature.

The main theme expressed in these novels is mass censorship on society. The authority figures shape society to believe what they want society to believe. In 1984, a group called “the party” exterminates and modifies any literature or documentations of history to get society to think what the party wants them to think. The party uses monitoring screens in homes and “thoughtpolice” to monitor citizens actions and thoughts. In Fahrenheit 451, the authority does not modify any literature or documentation. The authority chooses to exterminate any form of literature and documentation. Therefore, the society has no knowledge about history and what goes on in the world. This censors the thoughts of society and does not allow citizens to speak freely and express their thoughts about anything.

“Do you begin to see, then what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias…” (Orwell 267). 1984 and Fahrenheit 451 are both dystopias, although in each society, the government tells the citizens that it is a utopia. A dystopia is, “An imaginary place or state in which the condition of life is extremely bad, as from deprivation, oppression or terror” (“dystopia”). On the other hand, a utopia is described as, “An ideally perfect place, especially in its social, political, and moral aspects” (“utopia”). There are many similarities between the society in 1984 and the society in Fahrenheit 451, as well as many differences.

With dystopia being a present theme in both George Orwell’s, 1984 and Suzanne Collins, The Hunger Games, both titles share similarities and contrasts to one another. Even though these books were written decades apart, they share similarities in the government control and the presence of poverty in the settings. But, both books contradict one another as futuristic settings are viewed differently depending on when the books are written, as well as the remembrance of past struggles in the societies. The seeds of a dystopian theme are found in 1984 and The Hunger Games, presenting similarities and differences from in both books, even though the books were written decades a part.