preview

Simone De Beauvoir Oppression Analysis

Decent Essays

The strife and struggle of the oppressed is not universal in nature. The conditions and expectations through which their existence is defined are also not universal. Those can depend on very complex factors such as nationality, gender identity, as well as social and economic status. However, it is important to mention that although not all oppressed groups experience oppression the same way, there are definitely many parallels across the varied experiences. Sartre’s discussion of shared group identities, i.e. the Jewish identity, and his treatment of oppressed and colonized peoples, easily contrasts Simone De Beauvoir’s analysis of women’s position in society. The comparison of the two illustrates how oppressed groups show a tendency to share …show more content…

“Thus humanity is male and man defines woman not in herself but as relative to him: she is not regarded as an autonomous being” (Beauvoir xxii.) Following that train of thought, it is no surprise that man perceives woman to be the second sex. “Man can think of himself without woman. She cannot think of herself without man” (Beauvoir xxii.) However, in contrast to Sartre’s analyses of oppression, the subjugation of woman is unique because through the history of time, this perception has never been contested or reversed, whereas in oppression due to racism or colonization, the Other race has at one point in history been free. When comparing women to other oppressed groups such as “American Negroes or Jews,” Beauvoir makes the distinction that the latter’s original state was one of independence; a state only changed due to historical events. She maintains that although oppressed, those people still retain memories of their former days of autonomy. “…they possessed in common a past, a tradition, sometimes a religion or a culture” (Beauvoir xxiv) Beauvoir claims that women have been denied their history, that their independence and agency has been conditioned out of them. “They have no past, no history, no religion of their own” (Beauvoir …show more content…

“Woman herself recognizes that the world is masculine on the whole; those who fashioned it, ruled it, and still dominate it today are men. As for her…it is understood that she is inferior and dependent” (Beauvoir 629.) Therefore, women tend to be much more complicit in playing the roles that are assigned to them. “Shut up in her flesh, her home, she sees herself as passive before these gods with human faces who set goals and establish values. In this sense there is truth in the saying that makes her the eternal child” (Beauvoir 629.) However, just as Sartre is lenient when he does not hold Jews fully accountable for their oppression, the same understanding and tolerance should be extended towards women. Their identity is a product of society and through social conditioning, they are led to believe that they do not control their future and are encouraged towards a state of compliance and passivity. “…woman clings to routine; time has for her no element of novelty… she is doomed to repetition, she sees in the future only a duplication of the past” (Beauvoir 630.) Women tend to be in a permanent state of waiting until the arrival of men in their lives. “Her whole existence is waiting. Since she is confined in the limbo of immanence and contingence” (Beauvoir 642.) Historically, women have been prevented from taking an active role

Get Access