De Republica Anglorum is Sir Thomas Smith’s seminal work, a striking social commentary on the order of English society in the 16th Century. It dissects in great detail the “four sorts” of the social order, and provides us with several great insights into Early Modern Englishmen’s opinions on power, social mobility and their places within society. Sir Thomas Smith was a scholar and diplomat of the 1560s, and a man in possession of “a precocious intellect” . He came from small means, as the son of a sheep famer, and managed to elevate his status through education, entering Cambridge from the early age of 11 to peruse law and politics. De Republica was written during his time in the French court, where he was appointed ambassador. This period was rife with scepticism, particularly towards the newly crowned Queen Elizabeth, and it is possible that De Republica was written defensively in reaction to the whispers of the French court. Her claim to the throne was hotly debated and there was speculation that English society could not function properly under a female ruler. There is also evidence to suggest it was a criticism of the French court, as seen in the subtle nods to tax paying gentlemen (quote). The circulation of the book is also important to consider. It was written between 1563 and 1565, but not published officially until 1583. It gained popularity and acclaim through manuscript circulation, and was widely ready throughout England and France. Smith paints a very detailed
After 1688, England became a constitutional monarchy under the rule of Mary and William. English society evolved from embracing the absolute monarchy to one that introduces new thought processes and beliefs. In Voltaire’s Letters on England, he contributes the development of England to its respectable regards toward religion, governmental systems, and scientific advancements. He contrasts these practices with those of the less respectable Frenchmen, and reveals the different outcomes of the two nations.
A writer hired by Cromwell in the 16th century wrote about the need of order so that the better can rule the lesser and considered it “necessary” in an independent country (Doc 7). During this time in the protestant reformation, there was already much unrest and division in society. Cromwell felt the need to have order, with those higher up in status deciding what was good for the country, with no need for lesser contribution. Those opposed to the Pilgrimage of Grace were evident in their goal for their own success. This is evident in the Marchers’ Proclamation, that was delivered at several gatherings in northern England in the 16th century. It revealed that the commoner’s must lean on each other and their faith to fight against the thieves, for they saw the rulers of England as ignorant towards their needs (Doc 2). These two documents show great differences in point of view, for those with Cromwell believed that they would make just rulers over the society, where as the commoners thought that they were doing poorly to help their needs against the
John Smith believed that success in such adventures requires individual initiative and commitment. His journey began working with his dad in his shop up until the age of 16. After his father had passed, he attempted to run it on his own, but that didn’t last long; so he joined the French Army. After a while he started exploring the new world which included Virginia, New England and Summer Isles. Smith had a very prestigious and independent outlook on life and throughout his journey it had brought him misfortune for much of his explorations, but with the misfortune came a bundles of successes. One incident which played a significant role in his journey was being captured by Powhatan; and Pocahontas, herself, helped free him. John Smith was an
During this time, the people began to see monarchical succession as a tyranny that could no longer subsist in their nation. Paine therefore introduces a common thought brewing during this time. Paine states, “For all men being originally equals, no one by birth could have a right to set up his own family in perpetual preference to all others forever (79).” This idea of equality amongst all men was a common sentiment amongst those that were seeking a change in government. Why should one class of citizens be above another based solely on their birth? This was the question
Isaac H. is a well-developed African American that experienced the Great Migration in his lifetime. Growing up poor, Isaac had nine siblings and family throughout the United States. Isaac’s Aunt specifically lived in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and invited Isaac to experience the north at an early age by working there during his summers.The Great Migration was a movement that changed Isaac H.’s life because his family moved to the north and created a foundation for him.This foundation, along with Isaac’s experience, was established by the Blacks who took a risk and moved to the North without a guarantee that there was anything for them .This risk was in the minds of almost 6 million African Americans and they all made a choice that resulted in
At first, Austen reveals the tensions between the working class and the upper class and emphasizes the rigid social structure that existed in nineteenth century London. The rigidity of the social structure can be attributed to the fact that “no class exists for itself but is bound by reciprocated rights and duties to classes above and below” (Kilger 359). Although the classes are separate and very distinct from each other, they still all depend on one another to thrive and succeed. However, this was definitely not the case during the
Lower class individuals struggled against many conflicts in early history. One in particular conflict was Bacon’s Rebellion. Bacon's Rebellion
Captain John Smith and William Bradford both have similar stories, yet there are differences between both of them. Some similarities both of these stories have in common is that both of the men, Captain John and William Bradford are from England, they also went through starvation and received food from native americans. In the other hand the difference from both stories is that Captain John is in The History Of Virginia and William Bradford was from the Plymouth Plantation. Captain John Smith would sell tobacco in Jamestown, he was selfish, gave no food if there was no work and in the story they did not help each other. William Bradford believed in freedom, had faith to get through the
Politics, during the 18th century, were not what someone of our modern day would think they were. The nobles ran all cities, created and controlled all laws. Those who were in such positions to make these decisions believed to have been lucky enough to be born into wealth and dignity. This
It was turbulent times for England during the 17th and 18th century. England was in an unquenchable thirst for more power. “During the 17th and 18th century, England was determined to subdue all lesser countries, especially Ireland” (Stevenson, 28). At the time, England was the dominating country, looking to expand their influence across the world. War broke out constantly as the conquest for more land continued. Moreover, war was constant with the three kingdoms, England, Ireland, and Scotland. Revolts in each kingdom also affected the country’s ability to participate in the war. As
The nobility of the Kingdom of France has been evaluated by various scholars of history. There is something to be said, however, for those who chronicled their impressions while living them in the 17th and 18th centuries. The excerpts of Charles Loyseau’s A Treatise on Orders, written in 1610, and Isabelle de Charriere’s The Nobleman, written in 1763 provide two very different glimpses on the French nobility from differing time periods. From these two accounts, it is clear that there was a marked shift in the way some viewed the nobility and their role in the operation of the French state. While Loyseau praises the nobility nearly wholeheartedly,
Initially hindered by James I’s belief in the divine right of kings, the Stuart inability to communicate led to country-wide chaos, in stark contrast to the relative unity of Tudor reign. In this essay, I will explore the reigns of four specific Tudor and Stuart monarchs: Henry VIII, Elizabeth
"John, by the grace of God king of England, lord of Ireland, duke of Normandy, Aquitaine and Hazzard, and count of Anjou, to his archbishops, bishops, abbots, earls barons, justiciars, sheriffs, ministers, bailiffs and all his faithful men, greeting."1 So begins the most famous legal document of the Middle Ages. The Magna Carta was a product of the power struggle between King John and his barons in the year 1215. Although it was intended to address concerns that were specific to its time and place, it became a high water mark of legal freedom for centuries to come. This essay will examine the events that caused the Magna Carta to be written, the key provisions it contains, and the effect it had on the law of England and
The Magna Carta, also known as the “Great Charter”, is one of the best known political documents in history. It has influenced nearly every great document of note following it, including the Declaration of Independence written by the founding fathers of America. The Magna Carta was a direct result of the reigns of King Richard the Lionheart and his brother King John and was written by barons who wanted to protect their rights, albeit in a way that mostly benefitted them. Therefore, this paper will attempt to examine the historical context surrounding the Magna Carta, what concerns the document demonstrated about the reigns of Richard and John as exemplified by the demands within the charter, and how the Magna Carta changed the relationship
Voltaire was a rebellious and radical thinker, whose sharp wit and pointed satire drew the ire of critics who say he disrespected the orthodoxy of church and state, and won the respect of a growing rationalist movement that had emerged out of the public sphere in Europe between the 17th and 18th centuries. Although Voltaire is known today for being a philosophical powerhouse, whose writing is the stuff of legend, for most of his life he only wrote plays, poems, and novels. It wasn’t until he was almost forty in 1733 that he published his first major philosophical work, “Letters Concerning the English Nation.” This was a series of letters that describe the customs, cultures and great men of England, and even though his praise for England, a country “where all the arts are honored and rewarded,” and where one could think “free and nobly without being held back by any servile fear,” may be overblown, they are important nonetheless, because it highlights the virtues that an Enlightened society should strive for. (114) In many ways these were not so much love letters to England, as much as they were a call for the rest of Europe to progress in the rationalist movement that England had set the tone for.