preview

Slave-Colonist Writings

Decent Essays

How can a slave and colonist writings have a similar in a themes? That question is important since how can a person compare both Olaudah Equiano and St. John de Crevecouer work. One who was a slave in and wrote about what his experience with being one. The other is on a what person who new to the new world experience can be and how to treat everyone in the new world. On the face of the two writing look to be only similar in that they talk about person experience in the new world without going into the meaning of the work, then that is all they will. But once the reader goes on in search of the themes of the writing will they discover what is trying to be done and will start see how they can work together. Some writing with completely different …show more content…

In his writing, there is no one area it basically the whole thing cover it. His writing is set up in phases being brought to being sold, voyage over the ocean, being in the new world and finally getting his freedom. Each part could be an essay onto themselves. In his voyage to the new word he shows what happens one time the slavers had fish to eat. The slavers with the fish, “to our astonishment who were on deck, rather than give any of them to us to eat, as we expected, they tossed the remaining fish into the sea again and some of my countrymen, being pressed by hunger, took an opportunity when they thought no one saw them of trying to get a little privately; but they were discovered, and the attempt procured them some very severe floggings.” (Perkins 166) In this passage that the slaver treat the Africans as something lower than cattle since cattle would be fed so not to die. To the slavers it was a not matter to them how many made it over only just the strong. This passage with what it shows question why do people at their lowest point in life have to be treated so horrible and this is not the only thing he shows. Also once the reader is done reading it ask can any good treatment to truly be good since they are since a slave and do not have will do what they want. This is just small snapshot in the reading it is recommend to read so to find all of …show more content…

The first part he states how the Americas are welcoming of new people but in the second part Andrew meeting of the Natives for the other side of it. In Crevecoeur writing the discussion of treatment is not done under same situation as Equiano. His is more of a light heart story for the most part. The part that going to be look at is how Andrew is treat is and how native treats others. In de Crevecoeur writing Andrew is the one shown to be a stranger to the people. With that all he can show for himself is in this part, “I have brought with me a character from our Barra minister, can it do me any good here?” (de Crevecoeur) With just a character statement people treated with composie, “live with Mr. P. R., a particular friend of mine, who will give you four dollars per month, for the first six, and the usual price of five as long as you remain with him.” (de Crevecoeur) This part shows the reader that a person with no history should be treated good. Why should any person treat someone different base on a first meeting without every showing any reason not to? This theme come again in Andrews meeting of the Native he does not treat them the same as the people did. One the character question why Andrew did. “Pacify yourself, said Mr. P. R., my house is as safe with these people, as if I was there myself; as for the victuals, they are heartily welcome, honest Andrew;” (de

Get Access