In my introduction to the psychological perspective, I found that was more capable of comprehending those ideas presented to me when I applied them to relevant research. One particular article stood out which presented these ideas through the observation of on social acceptance and rejection. In the article, “Social Acceptance and Rejection: The Sweet and the Bitter,” both authors C. Nathan DeWall and Brad J. Bushman (2011) are determined to illustrate the importance of lasting relationships during individual 's’ lives (DeWall & Bushman, 2011). Through the article both DeWall and Bushman depict the dichotomy between social acceptance and rejection through a social psychological research in order to educate the public on the nuanced effects of social rejection of the individual. In their study, DeWall and Bushman are not only able to define social acceptance and rejection, but also illustrate its effects and relevance to our everyday relations with other individuals. The researchers were able to do this in their research by adopting a gradual structure in their article leading the readers to a gradual understanding of the factors surrounding social acceptance and rejection. Initially within their study, DeWall and Bushman found it necessary to define the both terms (social rejection and acceptance) by referencing Leary, M.R. (2010). In their research, DeWall and Bushman establish a contrasting relationship between social acceptance and rejection by distinguishing its
First of all, what is acceptance? Acceptance is when people see each other for who they really are, not just what is on the outside, but what is on the inside. A great example of what acceptance is can be seen in the book Roll of Thunder: Hear My Cry. Jeremy Simms, a white child, talks to and
Psychology is one of the newest sciences. Because it is the science of the mind and behavior, it is also less concrete than some of the other sciences. Over the years, social scientists have developed theories or perspectives based off of their observations, research, and the perspectives of other scientists. Although there is some overlap, each of the major perspectives of psychology is unique. As a result, they each have strengths and weaknesses and explain psychology in a different way. One theory, the sociocultural perspective, is exactly what its name suggests. It’s the idea that the society and groups that an individual belongs to are what influences development, thoughts, and behavior. The sociocultural perspective was
Feeling accepted is the grounding of a happy life. When people don’t feel accepted, that is when they become depressed or unhappy. Acceptance comes in many forms; something small like being accepted on to a certain table at lunch time, to something as big as being accepted in the greater community or even feeling accepted in the world. Acceptance can define who you are. If somebody isn’t accepted it can damage their souls and can throw them off the path of finding who they really are. Being accepted by others may seem the most important thing to strive towards, but the most rewarding and most damaging trait of acceptance is accepting yourself. Being comfortable with whom you are; it’s only then that others will really accept you. Acceptance can be an extremely
This article analyzed the positive experiences of twelve individuals who had visible differences (Egan et al 2011, p. 739). This study discovered four main elements that helped people to interpret their related experiences in a positive way. Generally, it can be seen that the authors applied interpretive social science (Neuman 2006, p. 87) to produce this study to capture participants’ experiences and feelings. There are some advantages that can be yielded by utilizing this perspective. Firstly, the authors were able to understand individuals’ different social lives. The complex social factors can be extracted to interpret participants’ feelings and emotions from their personal experiences. It was
This is a formal research paper and must be eight to ten pages in length. Imagine that this paper will be used as a reference for individuals who are completely unfamiliar with social psychology principles. This paper will provide them with an overview of the field, and explain the key principles associated with its practice.
It is very hard to be criticized instead of being supported and Junto Diaz was rejected and censured by his family and at school by some of his classmates for not being the typical “Dominican alpha male”. In addition, it is common thing today to witness the cases of rejection by the society you are living in. A fine example of a safe target of rejection and its affect is Oscar, the main character of the Junto Diaz’s “The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao”. However, do we know the main causes of which a person is rejected by society and the consequences that this rejection brings with it? Many of you will agree with me that racial or cultural bias, being introvert, appearance, and level of education, economy, and different social classes are the most common reason why people reject others. Also, rejection brings with it many negative consequences such as damaging impact on mental and physical health, produces surges of anger and aggression, destroys our self-esteem and temporarily lowers our IQ.
Jia Jiang introduced the audience his motion of 100 days of rejection, a “Rejection Therapy”, which was invested by the Canadian entrepreneur, Jason Comely. The basic idea of Rejection Therapy is for 100 days, you go out and look for rejection and every day get rejected by something, you desensitize yourself from the pain by the end. What’s more, he talked a lot about the reason makes the strangers reject his asking. For example, one day, Jia Jiang went to a stranger’s house with a flower in his hand and he asking for planting the flower in the stranger’s backyard. He was rejected but that’s because the stranger has a dog and he did not want Jia Jiang’s flower dug by this dog. Therefore, it was because what he offered does not fit what the stranger
The theories I will focus on in this essay is Social Penetration Theory and Uncertainty Reduction Theory. The reason I choose both these theories focus on initial interactions with stingers and how relationships develop. The social penetration theory is an objective theory (A First Look at Communication, page 93) uses the example of peeling an onion. It shows the “multilayered structure of personality.” The theory explains that as you go from not knowing someone and over time developing a more personal relationship through stages of disclosure. The other theory I will highlight will be Uncertainty Reduction Theory which follows seven main assumptions on how we develop information about a new acquaintance in order to lower uncertainty and predict others behaviors. Overall I will outline the core beliefs of these two theories and tie them together as how they both help us develop relationships with new people. And explain how we interact in new social settings. Both these objective theories show similar links but in some ways are different.
“No relationship is ever a waste of your time. If it didn’t bring you what you want, it taught you what you don’t want”. Primarily, the individuals in our life shape and mould our personality to construct who we are known as in the most challenging situations of our existence. These situations symbolise moments of sincerity and in some instances, demonstrate hatred and regret. This essay will highlight why relationships mould who we are, though, on the other hand, this essay will also highlight how individuality outlines social experience. Furthermore, it will also express the similarities between these two stances to illustrate ‘who we are’.
Mark Knapp developed a theoretical model to which identifies the stages of interpersonal relationships which explains how relationships begin and grow, as well as how they deteriorate and end. This model defines ten separate stages of relational development under three different interrelating categories; Coming Together, Relational Maintenance, and Coming Apart. An analysis of a personal relationship through the use of Knapp’s stages of relational development leads to a better understanding of that relationship and our role within it. In this essay I will be analyzing a personal relationship of my own using Knapp’s stages as a guide. However, these stages are subjective to each individual’s unique situation. Therefore, I will only be examining my relationship in the “coming together” stages. Furthermore, it is possible to pass over or amalgamate stages, as these stages are closer to a guide rather than set rules. For this analysis I will be breaking the “coming together” stages into initiating, experimentation and intensifying, integration, and bonding.
Cronin et al. (2007) explained a literature review as being a summary of research that has been carried out on the proposed research topic. The aim of the literature review is to provide a rationale for a new research topic to be undertaken. A good literature review will have a selection of information from varied sources. In this article the literature review is under the heading of background this may be a cause of confusion for some readers and could perhaps be more suited to its own heading. However, the literature review in this article clearly summarises the research that has been conducted into the topic of interest. The fact that the need to belong and accepted is a fundamental need is highlighted. Furthermore the effects of being depraved of this need are also brought to the forefront. In addition to this further studies have been conducted into the depravation of social relationships and its link with higher levels of somatic and psychosomatic illness.
There are several theories used by Psychologists to explain how relationships are formed. This paper will be looking at 3 of them: Needs Satisfaction Theory, Matching Hypothesis and Sociobiological Theory.
The desire for positive social relationships is one of the most fundamental and universal human needs. This need has a deep root in evolutionary history in relation to mating and natural selection and this can exert a powerful impact on contemporary human psychological processes (Baumeister & Leary 1995). Failure to satisfy these needs can bear devastating consequences on the psychological well being of an individual. These needs might not be satisfied as rejection, isolation, and ostracism occurs on a daily basis to people. Although being ignored and excluded is a pervasive circumstance present throughout history across species, and humans of all ages and cultures i.e the use of Ostracism (the feeling of isolation and exclusion) has been
There are many explanations for the origins of modern social psychology. It is therefore important to consider that social psychology cannot be traced back to one single source of origin (Burr, 2003). Hence, this is the reason why there are debates of what social psychology is. Allport (1985) described social psychology as the study an individual’s thoughts, feelings, and behaviours which are influenced by the actual, imagines, or implied presence of others. As seen from this definition there is a direct link between social science and the individual psychology (Sewell, 1989). Social psychology cannot be seen as a linear phenomenon. This is because social psychology has been derived from a combination of influences. The development of
The need for acceptance always comes with the fear of rejection. The need for acceptance is a powerful motivator, but the fear of rejection can be even scarier. We can all think of a time where we were rejected, and when thinking on that memory, and I bet you can still feel the sting. “Fear of