The two theories I chose are The Social Disorganization Theory and The Strain Theory. Social Disorganization theory was created by Clifford R. Shaw and Henry D. McKay. They wanted to know why certain areas in certain communities were continuously high in crime year after year. They found that the change or high turnover disrupted the community and caused the communities to be unstable. Social Disorganization Theory has two main sections, the three causes of neighborhood deterioration and the zones model. There is also a modern theory that adds to Social Disorganization by Robert Sampson. He says that social ties play a major role in the theory. Formal and informal ties to the community can help determine if they care or are invested in the …show more content…
The first zone being the central business zone in the center of the city, this is where businesses are set up. The second zone is the zone immediately outside the business zone and is called the transition zone. The tradition zone is where high crime takes place and where high turnover happens. The third zone is the multiple family zone/working class and it is right outside the transition zone. Then you have the single-family zone right outside the multiple family/working class zone. The last zone which is outside the city is the commuter zone and is suburb areas. This model can be applied to any major city. Crime rates will follow the same pattern in any city when using the zone model. The Zone model was an important part of understanding why crime continued to stay the same even through the years and the residents that were continuously changing. Another part of Social Disorganization Theory is the three Causes of neighborhood deterioration and they are: the diversity of the residents in the neighborhood, Residential Turnover: residents moving in and out of the community frequently, and Socio-Economic Status (SES), which is a combination of income; education; and occupation. All of these things are found in the transition zone of the zone model discussed above. The transition zone has the highest crime rates because of the instability of the community. Several …show more content…
One similarity is how both Social Disorganization Theory and Strain Theory can be specific to the situation. Social Disorganization Theory is specific to the inner most part of cities and Strain Theory is specific to an individual situation. Another similarity would be how both theories explain why crime occurs in the situations they occur in. One difference between the two theories is, while they can be specific to the situation, the situations that they occur in are very different. The Social Disorganization theory is specific to communities and Strain Theory is specific to an
This week reading discuss social disorganization and collective efficacy. Higgins (2010) stated that the social disorganization theory where a person live is important in deciding if their is weakness to commit crime. In both text, it stated that social disorganization theory came from the Chicago School's social ecology movement. The theory stated that many factors such as "geography, population movement, and physical environment" and the combination of these factors can cause criminal behavior (Higgins, 2010, p. 30). In explain social disorganization theory, it is broken into zones. The concentric zones explain crime because these are the zones where individuals worked and lived. By having this view it can tell that crime is probably
Frank Schmalleger explains the theory of social disorganization as one that depicts both social change as well as conflict, and lack of any agreement as the origin of its cause for both criminal behavior as well as nonconformity to society and closed associated with the ecological school of criminology (Schmalleger, 2012, p. 152). The philosophy behind the organization and structure of a society and how that contributes to criminal behavior within society is by stressing poverty, economic conditions, lack of education, lack of skills, are not sought-after in the work place, and divergent cultural values. Criminal behavior is the result of the person’s assignment of location within the structure of society.
Each of these three contemporary sociological theories of crime are similar in that they focus mainly on crime in poor or disadvantaged areas. This focus is obvious with social conflict theory and social disorganization theory but not as much with rational choice theory although it is there. With rational choice theory the concept of what is to be gained
Social disorganization theory was established by Shaw and Mckay (1942) in their famous work “Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas”. The main argument of the social disorganization theory is that, the place where people live will influence the individual’s behavior, and this may lead them to crimes. More precisely, certain characteristics of the neighborhood/community will strengthen or weaken the informal social control within the community, and this has mediating effect on crimes.
But the highest crime rates were taking place inside the city of Chicago. What they also noticed is that the building structures were significantly different in the higher crime rated areas than the lower crime rated areas. Because the city was going through a change, crime was more prominent to happen in their neighborhoods. So, because of the change, it caused the areas to be socially disorganized. Juvenile delinquency crime in the neighborhood of Chicago caused plenty of disrupting and anger amongst the community.
Social disorganization theory explains the ecological difference in levels of crime, simply based on cultural and structural factors that influence the social order in a given community. Social disorganization is triggered by poverty, social stability, ethnic heterogeneity, and a few key elements. Although Clifford Shaw and Henry D. McKay (1942), were known for social disorganization theory, in 1947 Edwin Sutherland introduced the notion of a ecological differences in crime that is the result of differential social organization. Despite similar arguments on social organization, Shaw and Mckay argued that the cultural integration explained the ecological variation in crime rates as a result of the negative impact on the community. Also elaborating on structural socioeconomic factors shaping informal control like poverty, heterogeneity, and residential mobility. Later Robert Sampson and Byron Groves (1989), refined the work of Shaw and Mckay by highlighting on the importance of social ties and new measures of social disorganization.
The social disorganization theory is directed towards social conditions. This theory argues that crime is due to social conflicts, change, and lack of consensus in the group.
Strain theory is only one of many theories that is associated with crime and deviant behavior. Another sociological theory, rational choice theory, also mirrors many principles found in classical
The basic structure is that the social disorganization theory is based on the Durkheim’s argument, social changes led to the collapse of maintaining the social orders which then lead to crime growth. This theory is formed by three factors. First, environmental factors, the living environment factors determine the wishes of people’s living. Second, population factors, the population flow rate in the community determine the formation of cultural values in the community. That is, lower flow rate means higher stability, the community cultural values are easy to form; on
The second theory I would like to discuss is the Strain theory. The strain theory basically states that crime breeds in the gap, imbalance, or disjunction between culturally induced aspirations for economic success and structurally distributed possibilities of achievement. The theory assumes fairly uniform economic success aspirations across social class and the theory attempts to explain why crime is concentrated among the lower classes that have the least legitimate opportunities for achievement. It is the combination of the cultural emphasis and the social structure which produces intense pressure for
This theory relates to where a person grows up. Social disorganization theory believes that place matters, meaning if you grew up in wealthy residential location with good school systems you are less likely to commit a homicide. Growing
The main assumption of Social Disorganization Theory is the ability to explain why crime committed by lower class communities is more prominent than neighborhoods from communities in better economic areas. This theory is the relationship of the destabilization of urban communities and neighborhoods through Shaw and McKay’s study (Quoted in Siegal, 2010) that used the analysis of Ernest Burgess’s Concentric Zones Model. This model generates ideas that the closer to “zone 2”, individuals in a community have more stress factors
Social Disorganization theory connects crime rates to neighborhood ecological characteristics. Based on the research and according to Osgood and Chambers, social disorganization theory specifies three important variables; residential instability, ethnic Heterogeneity, female-headed households. These three variables are considered to be the most criminogenic.
The Social Disorganization theory is an intriguing theory that can be seen in our society today. This theory states that “disorganized communities cause crime because informal social controls break down and criminal cultures emerge” (Cullen 6). The city of Chicago was the predominate focus upon the construction of this theory. The reasoning for this was because Chicago was the fastest growing population in the 19th century, a population starting at 5,000 in 1800 and growing to 2 million in 1900, nearly doubling every decade. At this point in time, the city was composed of citizens who did not speak a common language nor shared the same cultural values. Due to this social divide, these community members were unable to organize themselves in
Social disorganization theory is part of the positivist paradigm of criminology, a scientific approach to crime causes, and part of the Chicago School of crime. While trait theories under the positivist approach assume that crime is cause by internal factors, social disorganization theory relies on the assumption that crime is caused by environmental