Social Theory On The Social System

Talcott Parsons’s sex role theory was based and structured according to a more traditional family structure in that the man was the work-oriented contributor (breadwinners) and the women was the domestically oriented partner (housewives) of the man ensuring the home, children and day to day household functions were tended to. In retrospect this structure was seen to produce future laborers who became contributing members of society which is all part of a capitalist system (Conley, 2013).

He said that competition forces people to establish ties with one another in a web of affiliation, and in groups, conflict increases the degree of social solidarity within each group and at the same time, decreases the level of tolerance for deviance.

I have enrolled in SUNY Empire State College to earn an Associate in Arts degree with a concentration in Studies in Social Justice. For me, earning an AA in Social Theory, Social Structure and Change represents a foundation onto which I may structure additional learning in pursuit of a Bachelor of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies, perhaps with a concentration in Alternative Dispute Resolution, and ultimately leading toward advancement to graduate school, opportunity permitting.

The Social Process Theory states that criminal behavior is a function of a socialization process. Including of course the socio-psychological interaction by the offender with institutions and social organizations. This theory suggests that offenders turn to crime as a result of peer pressure, family problems, poor school performance, legal entanglements and other situations that eventually steers them towards criminal behaviors. Social Process theory also says that anyone can become a criminal, regardless of their background. The main support and research of this theory comes from the effect of the family on adolescents who engaged in delinquency or violent behaviors.

The social process theory suggests that criminals are raised in an environment that forms them to make unlawful decisions. People are influenced by what they are taught and their surroundings such as where they were raised, their guardians, and people they associated with. Individuals actions and thought process is going to be based off of what their first instinct is and their first instinct is going to be what they know best. For example, if a boy is raised in a home where their family shows their anger by reacting physically, then that child will be more likely the one that is getting in fights at school than the child who grew up in a home where fighting was never present. No one is born with the mind be

Social structure theories focus on the economic and social conditions in which lower-class youth live. The relationship between socioeconomic structure and crime is a relationship that scholars concluded that effected urban areas in which it promoted criminal behavior. While studies have shown a direct link between lower-class citizens and crime it is mistake to predispose all of them to a life of crime. Social structure theories examine why lower-class youth are more likely to commit crime than middle and upper-class youth. Social structure theories focus on two major factors that influence delinquency: socioeconomic conditions and cultural values. These conditions and values, in turn, are based on social and economic inequality in the

There are several theoretical perspectives that could be applicable to describe the presenting issues (a) Social Systems and Ecological Theory, (b) Behavioral theory, (c) Social Learned Theory, and (d) Attachment Theory. In addition, Eric Erikson’s stages of development describe the possible developmental process of the family. Fortunately, each theory provides and describes a framework for comprehending developmental trajectories, human behavior, and thought process.

In order to comprehend the significance of social theory in public health needs to know its co-relation with other things for the analytical approaches of the system for remedial solutions.

Daily social interactions are saturated by gender perceptions and expectations. At a very young age, children are capable of observing social behaviors. As they age, children are able to cognitively process and draw conclusions on how they should behave according to these observations (Bussey and Bandura, 1999). There are many theories that attempt to explain why gender stereotypes may hold true or at the very least impact our social interactions within Western culture. Sociological theories maintain that gender is entirely a social construct. Biological theories discuss the evolutionary benefits of sex and its importance as an adaptation. Social cognitive theory focuses on the influence of evolutionary factors in congruence with social and technological innovations creating selection pressures as to desired traits within the sexes (Bussey and Bandura, 1999). There are other social psychological theories that attempt to explain the reasons for gender differentiation including implicit personality theory. Implicit personality theory as applied to gender focuses on people expanding their perception of a person based of a central trait such as male or female (Ashmore and Del Boca, 1979). However, the commonality seen in the social psychological theory is that they focus on gender as a concept that is partially learned in addition to the influence these preconceptions have on our interpersonal relationships, specifically romantic partnerships. Socially conditioned

Howe (2009 cited in Jowett and Spray 2012) discusses how attachment can be a feature in the ambivalent stage as children can display challenging behaviours. This was evident on my home visits as I observed the older child displaying aggressive behaviours. I also observed boundaries or routines were not a feature in the home, this caused me concern as one the children would be approaching school age and I questioned how N would cope. This may have relevance to Erikson’s trust versus mistrust stage (1959 cited in McLeod (2013). This theory implies if the care received is harsh or inconsistent the child may not develop confidence in their future abilities. Fonagy et al (1991) concludes parent’s attitudes to attachment can affect their behaviour

The social structure theory deliberates delinquency as a gathering of the person’s dealings with numerous groups, organizations, and process in the society. Any person irrespective of their prominence in life is likely to become delinquents if they continue with negative social affiliations. Every aspect of the society, social and economic must be viewed using the social structure theories to find the cause of crime and deviance. The social structure theories consist of four types which include social disorganization theory, anomie theory, differential association theory, and labeling theory. Several theories offer different answers to this delinquent of influential the key features of a social group.

Education has been the key and structure of everyone’s life and future. Without education, where does one start to learn experience and evolve into a future of brilliance and success? Education, for the most part, is free and only requires the willingness to learn; however, once you get to the age and stage where you want to advance in a certain career or profession, money will be needed to further go on. Many of which can be viewed and analyzed in various theoretical perspectives, such as: a functionalist’s view, a conflict view, and an interactionist’s view.

To reinforce the concept of difference in a social movement Baum suggests that what makes an effective social theory, including feminist theory is it understands the social and political arrangements of the people situated in the argument. So that understanding then helps shape the processes the theory must then go through (Baum 1087), because feminism is fighting for something so big, gender equality, it affects at least half of the population, and not one person 's situation will be completely the same. For feminism because there is such a large base of people, it is difficult to situate everybody with their own individual arguments into the movement, because it is such a broad spectrum of people. This may be where some of the issues arise from feminism being such separated backgrounds of movements all fighting for the same issue.

8). The traditional views of gender roles are indeed quite different from the modern views. The men in society are the bread-winners where as the women take care of the children and home. There are basic and common work roles, however in terms of behaviour and involvement there are gender role distinctions. The sex roles generally play out in modern society as well, some sex roles and stereotypes for girls are that they are “nonaggressive, nonathletic, emotionally expressive, tender, domestic, and nurturing. Boys on the other hand are “aggressive, value achievement, attain goals through conflict, and work towards monetary success” (Whicker and Kronenfeld, 1986; pp. 8). The males in the society are “emotionally anesthetised, aggressive, physically tough and daring, unwilling or unable to give nurturance to a child” (Lewis and Sussman, 1986; pp. 1). These traits are carried out by this particular gender mostly outside the society to demonstrate their strength. Those individuals who ignore to carry out these personality traits are seen as weak and unmanly. The women on the other hand are given the responsibility of looking after the family and are supposed to have the opposite personality traits. For instance a woman can show emotions but not outside of the family because of the shame that would bring to the

Social theory looks for an explanation for social problems with the notion that social problems are reparable.(Lecture 01/28) Human behavior is socially manufactured. In this paper we will be examining human nature as it pertains to the social theories of Marx, Hochschild, and Goffman.