preview

Sonnet 130 Figurative Language

Decent Essays

Inner beauty is a concept that is thought to have been identified in modern times because of racial,ethnic, and religious segregation in the past centuries. However, very few in the undeveloped world came to realization that inner beauty is just as valuable as external attraction/beauty. In sonnet 130, William Shakespeare displays the true meaning of attraction for ones lover through imagery and figurative language. Shakespeare begins the sonnet with a simile “My mistress’ eyes are nothing like the sun;”(130.1). However he seems to insinuate a harsh way of comparing his lovers eyes to the Sun. Shakespeare implies that there is no blazing fire in his mistress and how they are rather dull. One can interpret this as a comparison between an …show more content…

One can infer that the preferable color in a woman’s cheeks are red and white. This is because of the use of the word “Dmask’d” (130.5) Shakespeare’s use of “dmask’d” means a pattern of red and white on a rose meaning an exemplary flower for him. Also, it represents a beautiful color of cheeks. “But no such roses see I in her cheeks;” (130.6) is a metaphorical statement because “roses in cheeks” is physically impossible but very effortless to visualize because it means the color of one's cheeks(Metaphorically). Subsequent to this, Shakespeare seems to impose self conflict in himself which is exhibited by ”I love to hear her speak, yet well I know, That music hath a far more pleasing sound;” (130.9-10) He expresses his attraction for the first time in the sonnet by saying that he loves to hear her speak. Admittedly, he is talking about his mistress. However, another side of him (The Conflict) implies “That music hath a far more pleasing sound;” This completely contradicts the statement of him loving his mistress’s voice. He fails to include an Onomatopoeia in his sonnet because of the formal tone of

Get Access